| Literature DB >> 30733742 |
Kiptoo Geoffry1, Rajeshwara N Achur1.
Abstract
Among different sources of lipases, fungal lipases have continued to attract a wide range of applications. Further, halophilic lipases are highly desirable for biodiesel production due to the need to mitigate environmental pollution caused as result of extensive use of fossil fuels. However, currently, the high production cost limits the industrial application of lipases. In order to address this issue, we have attempted to optimize lipase production by Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 and using palm oil mill effluent (POME) based medium. The production was optimized using a combinatory approach of Plackett-Burman (PB) design, one factor at a time (OFAT) design and face centred central composite design (FCCCD). The variables (malt extract, (NH4)2SO4, CaCl2, MgSO4, olive oil, peptone, K2HPO4, NaNO3, Tween-80, POME and pH) were analyzed using PB design and the variables with positive contrast coefficient were found to be K2HPO4, NaNO3, Tween-80, POME and pH. The significant variables selected were further analyzed for possible optimum range by using OFAT approach and the findings revealed that K2HPO4, NaNO3, and Tween-80 as the most significant medium components, and thus were further optimized by using FCCCD. The optimum medium yielded a lipase with an activity of 7.8 U/ml, a significant 3.2-fold increase compared to un-optimized medium. The present findings revealed that POME is an alternative and suitable substrate for halophilic lipase production at low cost. Also, it is clearly evident that the combinatory approach employed here proved to be very effective in producing high activity halophilic lipases, in general.Entities:
Keywords: Combinatory approach; Fusarium solani; Halophilic lipase; Optimization of lipase production; Palm oil mill effluent
Year: 2018 PMID: 30733742 PMCID: PMC6353730 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
List of variables used in Plackett–Burman design showing low and high levels of each variable.
| Variables | −(low level) | +(high level) |
|---|---|---|
| Peptone | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| NaNO3 | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| K2HPO4 | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| MgSO4 | 0.04 | 0.12 |
| Malt extract | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Olive oil | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| CaCl2 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| POME | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| pH | 5.50 | 8.50 |
| Tween-80 | 0.05 | 0.40 |
Experimental design using FCCCD of three independent variables with their actual values and six centre points showing the experimental and predicted response.
| Run # | A %V/V | B %w/v | C %w/v | Lipase activity U/ml | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6.53 |
| 2 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 6.52 | 6.39 |
| 3 | 1.80 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 4.55 | 4.83 |
| 4 | 1.20 | 1.47 | 1.00 | 6.21 | 6.14 |
| 5 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 6.53 |
| 6 | 1.80 | 0.40 | 1.50 | 5.70 | 5.69 |
| 7 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 6.52 | 6.53 |
| 8 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 6.38 | 6.53 |
| 9 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 6.52 | 6.53 |
| 10 | 2.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 6.58 | 6.35 |
| 11 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 0.15 | 6.30 | 6.22 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 1.50 | 7.34 | 7.52 |
| 13 | 0.60 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 6.19 | 6.33 |
| 14 | 0.60 | 1.20 | 1.50 | 7.36 | 7.21 |
| 15 | 1.80 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 6.69 | 6.64 |
| 16 | 0.19 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 7.60 | 7.63 |
| 17 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 6.70 | 6.53 |
| 18 | 1.80 | 1.20 | 1.50 | 6.99 | 7.25 |
| 19 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.80 | 7.80 | 7.69 |
| 20 | 1.20 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 5.02 | 4.88 |
A: Tween-80; B: K2HPO4; C: NaNO3.
Plackett–Burman experimental design for the evaluation of 11 components with the actual values for lipase production by Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 and the design response (lipase activity). The variables as well as their concentration levels were chosen on the basis of literature reports on lipase production.
| Run # | A %w/v | B %w/v | C %w/v | D %w/v | E %w/v | F %v/v | G %w/v | H %w/v | J %w/v | K pH | L %v/v | Lipase activity (U/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 8.50 | 0.40 | 0.72 ± 0.0164 |
| 2 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 1.20 | 0.12 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 8.50 | 0.40 | 2.36 ± 0.0439 |
| 3 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 1.20 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 1.20 | 8.50 | 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.0137 |
| 4 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 1.20 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 1.20 | 5.50 | 0.40 | 1.08 ± 0.0879 |
| 5 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 1.20 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 5.50 | 0.40 | 1.62 ± 0.0302 |
| 6 | 2.00 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 3.00 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 1.20 | 5.50 | 0.40 | 1.50 ± 0.1895 |
| 7 | 2.00 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 8.50 | 0.05 | 0.55 ± 0.0082 |
| 8 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 0.50 | 3.00 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 1.20 | 8.50 | 0.40 | 1.67 ± 0.0576 |
| 9 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 1.20 | 0.12 | 0.50 | 3.00 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 5.50 | 0.05 | 0.40 ± 0.0521 |
| 10 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 1.20 | 5.50 | 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.0027 |
| 11 | 2.00 | 0.60 | 1.20 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 1.20 | 8.50 | 0.05 | 2.25 ± 0.0357 |
| 12 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 5.50 | 0.05 | 1.06 ± 0.0659 |
A, Peptone; B, NaNO3; C, K2HPO4; D, MgSO4; E, Malt extract; F, Olive oil; G, (NH4)2SO4; H, CaCl2; I, POME; J, pH; K, Tween-80.
Mean ± standard deviation.
Fig. 1Contrast coefficient of variables for lipase production by Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 as determined using Plackett–Burman experimental results (A, Peptone; B, NaNO3; C, K2HPO4; D, MgSO4; E, Malt extract; F, Olive oil; G, (NH4)2SO4; H, CaCl2; I, POME; J, pH and K, Tween-80).
Fig. 2Effect of different concentrations of NaNO3 (0.2–1.0%, w/v) on Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 lipase activity.
Fig. 3Effect of different concentrations of K2HPO4 (0.2–1.0 %w/v) on Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 lipase activity.
Fig. 4Effect of different concentrations of Tween-80 (0.25–1.25 %v/v) on Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 lipase activity.
Fig. 6The effect of pH on Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 lipase activity.
Analysis of variance of surface quadratic model for lipase production.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | p-value | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 11.150 | 9 | 1.240 | 14.05 | 0.0001 | Significant |
| A-Tween-80 | 1.970 | 1 | 1.970 | 22.38 | 0.0008 | |
| B-K2HPO4 | 1.920 | 1 | 1.920 | 21.71 | 0.0009 | |
| C-NaN03 | 2.600 | 1 | 2.600 | 29.46 | 0.0003 | |
| AB | 1.750 | 1 | 1.750 | 19.87 | 0.0012 | |
| AC | 0.037 | 1 | 0.037 | 0.420 | 0.5326 | |
| BC | 0.030 | 1 | 0.030 | 0.340 | 0.5719 | |
| A2 | 0.390 | 1 | 0.390 | 4.420 | 0.0619 | |
| B2 | 1.840 | 1 | 1.840 | 20.88 | 0.0010 | |
| C2 | 0.330 | 1 | 0.330 | 3.770 | 0.0809 | |
| Residual | 0.880 | 10 | 0.088 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 0.340 | 5 | 0.067 | 0.620 | 0.6949 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 0.55 | 5 | 0.11 | |||
| Cor Total | 12.04 | 19 |
R = 0.92, Adj R = 0.86, C.V. % = 4.57, Adeq Precision 13.603, Mean = 6.50.
Significant at probability p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Fig. 7Response surface graphs depicting the interaction between (a) Sodium nitrate and Tweeen-80 (b) di-potassium hydrogen phosphate and Tweeen-80 (c) Sodium nitrate and di-potassium hydrogen phosphate towards halophilic lipase production by Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084.
The confirmation report on the prediction and validation of the experimental response surface model.
| Two-sided | Confidence = 95% | n = 6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Name | Level | Low level | High level | Actual coding |
| A | Tween-80 | 0.90 | 0.60 | 1.80 | 0.90 |
| B | K2HPO4 | 0.72 | 0.40 | 1.20 | 0.72 |
| C | NaN03 | 1.32 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 1.32 |
Fig. 5Effect of different concentrations of POME (0.25–1.25 %, w/v) on Fusarium solani NFCCL 4084 lipase activity.