| Literature DB >> 30733647 |
Basem M Abdallah1,2, Abdullah M Alzahrani1, Ashraf M Abdel-Moneim1,3, Nicholas Ditzel2, Moustapha Kassem2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone marrow derived stromal stem cells (BMSCs) are a clonogenic cell population that is characterized by self-renewal capacity and differentiation potential into osteoblasts, and other mesenchymal cell types. Mouse BMSCs (mBMSCs) are difficult to be cultured and propagated in vitro due to their replicative senescent phenotype, heterogeneity and high contamination with plastic adherent hematopoietic progenitors (HPCs). In this study, we described long-term culture of homogenous population of mBMSCs using simple and highly reproducible approach based on frequent subculturing (FS) at fixed split ratio in the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF).Entities:
Keywords: BMSC; Ectopic bone; Osteoblast; Stem cells; bFGF
Year: 2019 PMID: 30733647 PMCID: PMC6357407 DOI: 10.1186/s12575-019-0091-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
Fig. 1Long term culturing of primary mBMSCs using a combination of FS and bFGF. a Workflow of simple and reliable protocol used to culture and expand primary mBMSCs in long term. b Long term growth curves of primary isolated mBMSCs cultured by traditional method and three independent BMSCs-FS cell lines cultured by our new protocol in the presence of bFGF. c Phase contrast representative images (20x) of pBMSCs (p5) and three independent BMSCs-FS cell lines (at 70 PDL, p25). d FACS analysis of the expression of MSC surface markers by BMSCs-FS, p25. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments
Fig. 2Long term cultured BMSCs-FS differentiates efficiently into adipocytic cell lineage. a Adipocyte differentiation of BMSCs-FS (p25) as compared with ST2 cell line. Cells were induced with adipogenic cocktail (M&M) and accumulation of fat droplets during the time course of differentiation were measured by quantitative Oil Red O staining. Representative images of Oil Red O staining are shown at each time point during adipogenesis of BMSCs-FS and ST2 cells. b qPCR analysis of the adipogenic markers expression in BMSCs-FS and ST2 cells after 12 days of adipogenic induction. Data were represented as fold change over control non-induced. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments, (*p < 0.05, compared to ST2 cells at the same time points). Columns of the same group with different letters at each time point indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05
Fig. 3Increased osteogenic differentiation capacity in BMSCs-FS as compared with ST2 cells. a Osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs-FS (p25) as compared with ST2 cell line. Cells were induced with osteogenic cocktail and osteogenesis was measured by quantitative alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) and (b) Alizarin red staining. ALP and Alizarin red measurements were normalized to the cell number. ALP and Alizarin red staining images are shown. c qPCR analysis of the osteogenic markers mRNA expression after 12 days of induction in BMSCs-FS compared to ST2 cell line. Each target gene was normalized to reference genes and presented as fold change over control induced. Date were represented as fold change over control non-induced. d Up-regulated osteogenic genes in BMSCs-FS versus ST2 cells after 6 days of osteogenic induction. Gene expression was measured by qPCR using osteogenic RT2 profiler array as described in M&M. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments, (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, compared to ST2 cells at the same time points). Columns of the same group with different letters at each time point indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05
Upregulated osteoblastic genes by BMSCs-FS (p25) versus ST2 cells
| Gene name | Gene symbol | Fold |
|---|---|---|
| Ossification and matrix molecules | ||
| Alkaline phosphatase, liver/bone/kidney |
| 7.9 |
| Bone gamma carboxyglutamate protein |
| 2.1 |
| Collagen, type I, alpha 1 |
| 7.5 |
| Collagen, type I, alpha 2 |
| 4.2 |
| Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 |
| 4.4 |
| Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 |
| 2.3 |
| Insulin-like growth factor I receptor |
| 2.2 |
| BMP signaling pathway | ||
| Bone morphogenetic protein 2 |
| 74 |
| Bone morphogenetic protein 3 |
| 25.3 |
| Bone morphogenetic protein 5 |
| 2 |
| Bone morphogenetic protein 6 |
| 17.7 |
| Bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type 1B |
| 3.8 |
| Bone morphogenetic protein 4 |
| 2 |
| Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Molecules | ||
| Biglycan |
| 2 |
| Collagen, type II, alpha 1 |
| 7.5 |
| Collagen, type III, alpha 1 |
| 2.2 |
| Collagen, type XIV, alpha 1 |
| 2.2 |
| Collagen, type V, alpha 1 |
| 2.6 |
| Integrin alpha 2 |
| 10 |
| Integrin alpha 2b |
| 1.5 |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 2 |
| 17 |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 8 |
| 12 |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 9 |
| 23.7 |
| Osteogenic growth factors | ||
| Colony stimulating factor 1 (macrophage) |
| 3 |
| Fibroblast growth factor 1 |
| 2.5 |
| Fibroblast growth factor 2 |
| 2.7 |
| Growth differentiation factor 10 |
| 3.7 |
| Insulin-like growth factor 1 |
| 2 |
| Platelet derived growth factor, alpha |
| 3.2 |
| Osteogenic transcription factors | ||
| Runt related transcription factor 2 |
| 4.5 |
| Sp7 transcription factor 7 |
| 6.7 |
Cells were induced into osteoblast differentiation as described in the M&M. Mouse osteogenesis RT2 Profiler™ PCR array with 84 osteogenic genes was performed using the SYBR® Green quantitative PCR method. Each target gene was normalized to a group of reference genes as described by manufacture instruction’s. Up-regulated genes (≥ 2 fold) by BMSCs-FS are represented as fold change over ST2 cells
Fig. 4Increased the response of BMSCs-FS to osteogenic signaling factors. a, b Response of BMSCs-FS (p25) Vs ST2 cells to different osteogenic growth factors as measured by quantitative ALP activity. Cells were either cultured without osteogenic induction media (C, control), or induced to osteogenic lineage in the absence (I, induced) or the presence of 10 and 100 ng/mL of different osteogenic growth factors for 6 days. Representative images of ALP staining are shown. ALP measurements were normalized to cell number and represented as fold change over control non-induced cells. Data are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, compared to ST2 cells with the same condition). Columns of the same group with different letters at each growth factor indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05
Fig. 5Maintained in vivo stemness of BMSCs-FS at high PDL. In vivo ectopic bone formation by implanted BMSCs-FS (70 PDL, p25) and ST2 cells. Cells were mixed with HA/TCP powder and implanted subcutaneously in immune-deficient mice for 2 months (n = 6 implants for each cell line). Histological sections of implants were stained with H&E. Representative images of H&E sections show the in vivo capacity of 3 independent BMSCs-FS to form in vivo ectopic bone and bone marrow stroma containing adipocytes and fibroblasts. B = Bone, A = Adipocyte, HA = Hydroxyapatite. Scale bars indicate 100 μm
Fig. 6Long term culturing of primary neonatal calvarial osteoblasts (OBs) using a combination of frequent subculture and bFGF. a Long term growth curves of primary isolated OBs cultured by traditional method and two independent OBs-FS cell lines cultured by our new protocol in the presence of bFGF. b Phase contrast representative images (20x) of OBs (p5) and two independent OBs-FS cell lines (at 50 PDL, p30). c Osteoblast differentiation of OBs-FS, p30 measured by quantitative ALP activity at different time points during differentiation course of 15 days. Representative images of ALP staining are shown. d In vivo ectopic bone formation by mOBs versus 2 independent OBs-FS cell lines (at 50 PDL, p30). Cells were mixed with HA/TCP powder and implanted subcutaneously in immune-deficient mice for 2 months (n = 6 implants for each cell line). Images of H&E sections of implants show the formation of ectopic bone by implanted cells. Bone histomorphometric analysis of the percentage of total bone area per total area of the implants. Data are mean ± SD of three independent experiments, (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, compared to mBOs control). For panel c, columns with different letters at each time point indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05