Literature DB >> 30732719

Network Tomography for Understanding Phenotypic Presentations in Aortic Stenosis.

Grace Casaclang-Verzosa1, Sirish Shrestha1, Muhammad Jahanzeb Khalil1, Jung Sun Cho1, Márton Tokodi1, Sudarshan Balla1, Mohamad Alkhouli1, Vinay Badhwar2, Jagat Narula3, Jordan D Miller4, Partho P Sengupta5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to build a patient-patient similarity network using multiple features of left ventricular (LV) structure and function in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The study further validated the observations in an experimental murine model of AS.
BACKGROUND: The LV response in AS is variable and results in heterogeneous phenotypic presentations.
METHODS: The patient similarity network was developed using topological data analysis (TDA) from cross-sectional echocardiographic data collected from 246 patients with AS. Multivariate features of AS were represented on the map, and the network topology was compared with that of a murine AS model by imaging 155 animals at 3, 6, 9, or 12 months of age.
RESULTS: The topological map formed a loop in which patients with mild and severe AS were aggregated on the right and left sides, respectively (p < 0.001). These 2 regions were linked through moderate AS; with upper arm of the loop showing patients with predominantly reduced ejection fractions (EFs), and the lower arm showing patients with preserved EFs (p < 0.001). The region of severe AS showed >3 times the increased risk of balloon valvuloplasty, and transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (hazard ratio: 3.88; p < 0.001) compared with the remaining patients in the map. Following aortic valve replacement, patients recovered and moved toward the zone of mild and moderate AS. Topological data analysis in mice showed a similar distribution, with 1 side of the loop corresponding to higher peak aortic velocities than the opposite side (p < 0.0001). The validity of the cross-sectional data that revealed a path of AS progression was confirmed by comparing the locations occupied by 2 groups of mice that were serially imaged. LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction were frequently identified even during moderate AS in both humans and mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Multifeature assessments of patient similarity by machine-learning processes may allow precise phenotypic recognition of the pattern of LV responses during the progression of AS.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; left ventricular function; patient similarity; topological data analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30732719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  11 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; James K Min
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Aortic Stenosis: New Insights in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Saki Ito; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.101

3.  Electrocardiogram-Based Machine Learning Emulator Model for Predicting Novel Echocardiography-Derived Phenogroups for Cardiac Risk-Stratification: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Heenaben B Patel; Naveena Yanamala; Brijesh Patel; Sameer Raina; Peter D Farjo; Srinidhi Sunkara; Márton Tokodi; Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 4.  Machine learning for predicting cardiac events: what does the future hold?

Authors:  Brijesh Patel; Partho Sengupta
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-02-23

5.  A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity.

Authors:  Partho P Sengupta; Sirish Shrestha; Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Yasmin Hamirani; Hemant Kulkarni; Naveena Yanamala; Rong Bing; Calvin W L Chin; Tania A Pawade; David Messika-Zeitoun; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; David E Newby; Marie-Annick Clavel; Phillippe Pibarot; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence: Practical Primer for Clinical Research in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Sirish Shrestha; Peter D Farjo; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Risk prediction of clinical adverse outcomes with machine learning in a cohort of critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lorenzo Falsetti; Matteo Rucco; Marco Proietti; Giovanna Viticchi; Vincenzo Zaccone; Mattia Scarponi; Laura Giovenali; Gianluca Moroncini; Cinzia Nitti; Aldo Salvi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Applications of Machine Learning in Cardiology.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; Sudarshan Balla; Christopher Bianco; Jim Cheung; Roman Pachulski; Deepak Asti; Nikil Nalluri; Astha Tejpal; Parvez Mir; Jilan Shah; Premila Bhat; Tanveer Mir; Yasmin Hamirani
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2022-07-12

9.  A low-cost texture-based pipeline for predicting myocardial tissue remodeling and fibrosis using cardiac ultrasound.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Sirish Shrestha; Jung Sun Cho; Muhammad Khalil; Yashbir Singh; Abhiram Challa; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 10.  Patient Management in Aortic Stenosis: Towards Precision Medicine Through Protein Analysis, Imaging and Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Laura Mourino-Alvarez; Tatiana Martin-Rojas; Cecilia Corros-Vicente; Nerea Corbacho-Alonso; Luis R Padial; Jorge Solis; María G Barderas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.