Literature DB >> 30732469

Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85.

Laurens J C van Zandvoort1, Kaneshka Masdjedi1, Karen Witberg1, Jurgen Ligthart1, Maria Natalia Tovar Forero1, Roberto Diletti1, Miguel E Lemmert1, Jeroen Wilschut1, Peter P T de Jaegere1, Eric Boersma1, Felix Zijlstra1, Nicolas M Van Mieghem1, Joost Daemen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention is a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. However, the rationale for low post procedural FFR values remains often elusive based on angiographic findings alone. METHODS AND
RESULTS: FFR SEARCH (Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) is a prospective single-center registry in which post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR was assessed in 1000 consecutive all-comer patients. FFR measurements were performed with a microcatheter ±20 mm distal to the most distal stent edge. In 100 vessels with a post procedural FFR ≤0.85, and 20 vessels >0.85 high definition intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed. In 100 vessels with a post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR ≤0.85, mean post procedural FFR was 0.79±0.05. Minimal lumen area was 2.19 (1.81-3.19) mm2, mean lumen area was 5.95 (5.01-7.03) mm2, and minimal stent area was 4.01 (3.09-5.21) mm2. Significant residual focal proximal lesions were found in 29% of the assessed vessels whereas, focal distal lesions were found in 30% of the vessels. Stent underexpansion and malapposition were found in 74% and 22% of vessels, respectively. Clear focal signs of luminal narrowing were found in 54% of the vessels analyzed. Although incidences of focal lesions, underexpansion, and malapposition were similar between both cohorts, minimal stent area was significantly smaller in vessels with a post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR ≤0.85 as compared with those with an FFR >0.85.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a post procedural FFR ≤0.85, intravascular ultrasound revealed focal signs of luminal narrowing in a significant number of cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenosine; fractional flow reserve; hyperemia; intravascular ultrasound; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; stents

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30732469     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  8 in total

1.  Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Jiani Tang; Jiapeng Chu; Hanjing Hou; Yan Lai; Shengxian Tu; Fei Chen; Yian Yao; Zi Ye; Yanhua Gao; Yu Mao; Shaowei Zhuang; Xuebo Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Angio-Based Fractional Flow Reserve, Functional Pattern of Coronary Artery Disease, and Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Result: a Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Simone Biscaglia; Barry F Uretsky; Matteo Tebaldi; Andrea Erriquez; Salvatore Brugaletta; Enrico Cerrato; Giorgio Quadri; Giosafat Spitaleri; Iginio Colaiori; Domenico Di Girolamo; Alessandra Scoccia; Ottavio Zucchetti; Emanuele D'Aniello; Marco Manfrini; Rita Pavasini; Emanuele Barbato; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.947

3.  Prospective Evaluation of the Strategy of Functionally Optimized Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Barry F Uretsky; Shiv K Agarwal; Srikanth Vallurupalli; Malek Al-Hawwas; Rimsha Hasan; Kristin Miller; Abdul Hakeem
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Joost Daemen; Laurens J C van Zandvoort; Tara Neleman; Jeroen Wilschut; Wijnand K Den Dekker; Rutger J van Bommel; Miguel Lemmert; Isabella Kardys; Paul Cummins; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.546

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting.

Authors:  Mariusz Tomaniak; Tara Neleman; Anniek Ziedses des Plantes; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Laurens J C van Zandvoort; Janusz Kochman; Wijnand K den Dekker; Jeroen M Wilschut; Roberto Diletti; Isabella Kardys; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Joost Daemen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Immediately After Stenting.

Authors:  Zuoyi Zhou; Baozhen Zhu; Fangfang Fan; Fan Yang; Shu Fang; Zhi Wang; Lin Qiu; Yanjun Gong; Yong Huo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 7.  Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: State of the Art.

Authors:  Alessandra Scoccia; Mariusz Tomaniak; Tara Neleman; Frederik T W Groenland; Annemieke C Ziedses des Plantes; Joost Daemen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.955

8.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jinlong Zhang; Jiesuck Park; Seokhun Yang; Minsang Kim; Jun Pil Yun; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Shao-Liang Chen; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils P Johnson; Nico H J Pijls; Abdul Hakeem; Barry F Uretsky; Yohei Hokama; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hong-Seok Lim; Tsuyoshi Ito; Akiko Matsuo; Lorenzo Azzalini; Massoud A Leesar; Tara Neleman; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti; Joost Daemen; Damien Collison; Carlos Collet; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.