| Literature DB >> 30731688 |
W Pang1, W T Crow1, J E Luc1, R McSorley1, R M Giblin-Davis1, K E Kenworthy2, J K Kruse3.
Abstract
Water-displacement and WinRHIZO root-scanning methods were compared for efficacy of root damage assessment. Results from both methods were similar and a highly significant relationship was found between the two methods in trial one (r2 = 0.9968, P < 0.0001) and trial two (r2 = 0.9988, P < 0.0001). Both protocols provide consistent root volume measurements; however, water displacement is preferred as an economical method if a quick evaluation of a large amount of roots is essential. For a more detailed root morphological and architectural analysis, WinRHIZO root scanning provides additional information about several root parameters that cannot be measured by simple water displacement.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 30731688 DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Dis ISSN: 0191-2917 Impact factor: 4.438