Literature DB >> 30731335

Technological innovation and personalized surgical treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer patients: A prospective multicenter Italian experience to evaluate the novel percutaneous approach.

S Gueli Alletti1, S Cianci1, E Perrone2, F Fanfani3, C Vascone4, S Uccella1, V Gallotta1, G Vizzielli1, A Fagotti5, G Monterossi1, G Scambia5, C Rossitto6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, feasibility and oncological adequacy of the Percutaneous Surgical System - PSS in a consecutive series of low-risk endometrial cancer staging. STUDY
DESIGN: From May 2015 to April 2017, we prospectively performed 30 consecutive percutaneous staging for low/intermediate risk endometrial cancer (FIGO stage IA G1-G2, IB G1-G2, IA G3). All patients were divided in two different groups on the basis of surgical procedure received: Group A included patients submitted to radical Class A hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; Group B concerned patients that received a lymph nodal assessment also.
RESULTS: The time needed to install percutaneous instruments and suprapubic trocar was 4 min. (range 2-10). The recorded median operative time (OT) was 80 min. (range 65-120) for Gr.A and 143 min. (range 107-190) for Gr.B, in which the median time of lymph nodal assessment was 55 min. (range 20-76). The median time for hysterectomy was 60 min. (range 40-110) in all cases. Lymph nodal assessment was performed in 14 (46.6%) cases: 7 sentinel node mapping, 7 pelvic lymphadenectomy. No intraoperative complications or LPS/LPT conversions were recorded. Median discharge time was 2 days (range 1-4), 5 patients were discharged in 3rd post-op day, and only 1 patient was discharged in 4th day for fever. All patients conveyed high satisfaction with the cosmetic results. A progressive overall reduction of pain perception was observed at 24 h after surgery. Median follow-up was of 14 months (range 12-36), no recurrences have been detected.
CONCLUSIONS: PSS seems to be a feasible approach for endometrial cancer staging. Larger experiences and prospective comparative studies are important to assess our assumptions and further investigate the real benefits of percutaneous surgical system.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Gynecological oncology; Minimally invasive surgery; New technology; Percutaneous approach; Personalized surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30731335     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  9 in total

Review 1.  The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulia Armano; Andrea Rosati; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 2.  Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Gaetano Riemma; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-04-02

3.  Laparoscopic vs percutaneous hysterectomy in obese patients: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  E Perrone; F Fanfani; C Rossitto; S Cianci; A Fagotti; S Restaino; C Fedele; G Scambia; S Gueli Alletti
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-03-27

4.  A Lymph Node Count-Based AJCC Staging System Facilitates a More Accurate Prediction of the Prognosis of Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Xinlong Huo; Shufang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer staging: large retrospective single-institution study.

Authors:  Emanuele Perrone; Ilaria Capasso; Tina Pasciuto; Alessandro Gioè; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Stefano Restaino; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Sentinel Lymph Node in Aged Endometrial Cancer Patients "The SAGE Study": A Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  Stefano Cianci; Andrea Rosati; Virginia Vargiu; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulio Sozzi; Alessandro Gioè; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Alfredo Ercoli; Francesco Cosentino; Roberto Berretta; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Role of uterine manipulator during laparoscopic endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Andrea Rosati; Stefano Uccella; Gaetano Riemma; Mattia Tarascio; Marco Torella; Pasquale De Franciscis; Nicola Colacurci; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 8.  Hysteroscopy in the management of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in reproductive aged women: new developments and current perspectives.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Gaetano Riemma; Jose Carugno; Benito Chiofalo; George Angelos Vilos; Stefano Cianci; Mehmet Sukru Budak; Bernardo Portugal Lasmar; Antonio Raffone; Ilker Kahramanoglu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 9.  Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital.

Authors:  Nicolò Bizzarri; Camilla Nero; Francesca Sillano; Francesca Ciccarone; Marika D'Oria; Alfredo Cesario; Simona Maria Fragomeni; Antonia Carla Testa; Francesco Fanfani; Gabriella Ferrandina; Domenica Lorusso; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.