Literature DB >> 30731249

On DNA transfer: The lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better.

Annica Gosch1, Cornelius Courts2.   

Abstract

Since DNA from touched items and surfaces ("touch DNA") can successfully and reliably be analyzed, the question as to how a particular DNA containing sample came to be from where it was recovered is of increasing forensic interest and expert witnesses in court are increasingly challenged to assess for instance whether an incriminatory DNA sample matching to a suspect could have been transferred to the crime scene in an innocent manner and to guess at the probability of such an occurrence. The latter however will frequently entail expressing a subjective probability i.e. simply making a best guess from experience. There is, to the present date, an extensive and complex body of literature on primary, secondary, tertiary and even higher order DNA transfer, its possibility, plausibility, dependency on an array of variables and factors and vast numbers of permutations thereof. However, from our point of view there is a lack of systematic data on DNA transfer with existing research widely varying in quality and relevance. Our aim was, starting from a comprehensive survey of the status quo and appreciating its increasing importance, to in the first part of our review raise consciousness towards the underestimated and insufficiently accounted for complexity of DNA transfer and thus appendant research of forensic scientists serving as expert witnesses in court but also acting in the role of a journal referee to point them to areas of criticism when reviewing a manuscript on DNA transfer. In the second part, we present propositions how to systematize and integrate future research efforts concerning DNA transfer. Also, we present a searchable database providing an extensive overview of the current state of knowledge on DNA transfer, intended to facilitate the identification of relevant studies adding knowledge to a specific question and thus help forensic experts to base their opinion on a broader, more complete and more reproducible selection of studies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA transfer; Forensic genetics; Touch DNA; Trace DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30731249     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  7 in total

1.  Cleaning a crime scene 2.0-what to do with the bloody knife after the crime?

Authors:  Janine Helmus; Jeremy Poetsch; Manuel Pfeifer; Thomas Bajanowski; Micaela Poetsch
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  The diversity of shedder tests and a novel factor that affects DNA transfer.

Authors:  Max Schwender; Malte Bamberg; Lisa Dierig; Sebastian N Kunz; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Human DNA contamination of postmortem examination facilities: Impact of COVID-19 cleaning procedure.

Authors:  Carla Bini; Arianna Giorgetti; Elena Giovannini; Guido Pelletti; Paolo Fais; Susi Pelotti
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.717

6.  Interpretation of DNA data within the context of UK forensic science - evaluation.

Authors:  Roberto Puch-Solis; Susan Pope
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-09-24

7.  Efficient DNA Sampling in Burglary Investigations.

Authors:  Colin Charles Tièche; Markus Dubach; Martin Zieger
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.