| Literature DB >> 30731208 |
Elin S Gray1, Tom Witkowski2, Michelle Pereira3, Leslie Calapre3, Karl Herron4, Darryl Irwin4, Brett Chapman4, Muhammad A Khattak5, Jeanette Raleigh6, Athena Hatzimihalis6, Jonathan Cebon2, Shahneen Sandhu6, Grant A McArthur6, Michael Millward7, Melanie Ziman8, Alexander Dobrovic9, Stephen Q Wong10.
Abstract
The analysis of circulating tumor DNA provides a minimally invasive molecular interrogation that has the potential to guide treatment selection and disease monitoring. Here, the authors evaluated a custom UltraSEEK melanoma panel for the MassARRAY system, probing for 61 mutations over 13 genes. The analytical sensitivity and clinical accuracy of the UltraSEEK melanoma panel was compared with droplet digital PCR. The blinded analysis of 68 mutations detected in 48 plasma samples from stage IV melanoma patients revealed a concordance of 88% between the two platforms. Further comparison of both methods for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in 77 plasma samples demonstrated a Cohen's κ of 0.826 (bias-corrected and accelerated 95% CI, 0.669-0.946). These results indicate that the UltraSEEK melanoma panel is as sensitive as droplet digital PCR for the detection of circulating tumor DNA in this cohort of patients but highlight the need for detected variants to be confirmed orthogonally to mitigate any false-positive results. The MassARRAY system enables rapid and sensitive genotyping for the detection of multiple melanoma-associated mutations in plasma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30731208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.12.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Diagn ISSN: 1525-1578 Impact factor: 5.568