Literature DB >> 30730483

Two-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in 245 Knees without Prior Treatment for Infection.

Stephen M Petis1, Kevin I Perry1, Tad M Mabry1, Arlen D Hanssen1, Daniel J Berry1, Matthew P Abdel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing 2-stage exchange for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty, the long-term risk of reinfection and mechanical failure and long-term clinical outcomes are not well known. The purpose of our study was to determine the long-term clinical results of 2-stage exchange for PJI following total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: We identified 245 knees that had undergone total knee arthroplasty and were subsequently treated with 2-stage exchange due to infection during the period of 1991 to 2006; the cohort had no prior treatment for PJI. Major, or 4 of 6 minor, Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) diagnostic criteria were fulfilled by 179 (73%) of the knees. The cumulative incidence of reinfection and of aseptic revision, accounting for the competing risk of death, were calculated. Risk factors for reinfection were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Knee Society Score (KSS) values were calculated. The mean age at spacer insertion was 68 years; 50% of the patients were female. The mean follow-up was 14 years (range, 2 to 25 years) following reimplantation.
RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of reinfection was 4% at 1 year, 14% at 5 years, 16% at 10 years, and 17% at 15 years. Factors that were predictive of reinfection included a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m (hazard ratio [HR], 3.1; p < 0.01), previous revision surgery (HR, 2.8; p < 0.01), and a McPherson host grade of C (HR, 2.5; p = 0.04). The cumulative incidence of aseptic revision for loosening was 2% at 5 years, 5% at 10 years, and 7% at 15 years. Femoral (HR, 5.0; p = 0.04) and tibial (HR, 6.7; p < 0.01) bone-grafting at reimplantation were predictive of aseptic failure. The most common complications were wound-healing issues, requiring reoperation in 12 (5%) of the knees. The rate of death at 2 years following reimplantation was 11%. The mean KSS improved from 45 at PJI diagnosis to 76 at 10 years following reimplantation (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term reinfection rates following 2-stage exchange for PJI after total knee arthroplasty were similar to those of shorter-term reports and were maintained out to 15 years. Mechanical failure rates were low if bone loss was addressed at the time of reimplantation. Improvements in clinical outcomes were maintained at long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30730483     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  22 in total

1.  The Effect of Time Spent with a Dynamic Spacer on Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Two-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fatih Golgelioglu; Sinan Oguzkaya; Abdulhamit Misir; Ahmet Guney
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Predictors of failure of two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee infection: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Antonio Russo; Luca Cavagnaro; Francesco Chiarlone; Mattia Alessio-Mazzola; Lamberto Felli; Giorgio Burastero
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Comparison of dynamic and static spacers for the treatment of infections following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiasheng Tao; Zijian Yan; Bin Pu; Ming Chen; Xiaorong Hu; Hang Dong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.677

4.  Factors affecting range of motion following two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic knee infection.

Authors:  Doo-Yeol Kim; Young-Chae Seo; Chang-Wan Kim; Chang-Rack Lee; Soo-Hwan Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  CORR Insights®: Low Reinfection Rates but a High Rate of Complications in THA for Infection Sequelae in Childhood: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carl A Deirmengian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Treatment options in PJI - is two-stage still gold standard?

Authors:  Igor Lazic; Christian Scheele; Florian Pohlig; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Christian Suren
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 7.  Classifications in Brief: The McPherson Classification of Periprosthetic Infection.

Authors:  Adam Coughlan; Fraser Taylor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  What Is the Mid-term Survivorship of Infected Rotating-hinge Implants Treated with One-stage-exchange?

Authors:  Malte Ohlmeier; Fadi Alrustom; Mustafa Citak; Jochen Salber; Thorsten Gehrke; Jannik Frings
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: High Perioperative Mortality and Complications.

Authors:  Courtney E Baker; Brian P Chalmers; Michael J Taunton; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Adam W Amundson; Daniel J Berry; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 10.  Systematic review of risk prediction studies in bone and joint infection: are modifiable prognostic factors useful in predicting recurrence?

Authors:  Maria Dudareva; Andrew Hotchen; Martin A McNally; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Matthew Scarborough; Gary Collins
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.