Literature DB >> 30729961

A convenient method for the generation of {Rh(PNP)}+ and {Rh(PONOP)}+ fragments: reversible formation of vinylidene derivatives.

Matthew R Gyton1, Thomas M Hood, Adrian B Chaplin.   

Abstract

The substitution reactions of [Rh(COD)2][BArF4] with PNP and PONOP pincer ligands 2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinomethyl)pyridine and 2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinito)pyridine in the weakly coordinating solvent 1,2-F2C6H4 are shown to be an operationally simple method for the generation of reactive formally 14 VE rhodium(i) adducts in solution. Application of this methodology enables synthesis of known adducts of CO, N2, H2, previously unknown water complexes, and novel vinylidene derivatives [Rh(pincer)(CCHR)][BArF4] (R = tBu, 3,5-tBu2C6H3), through reversible reactions with terminal alkynes.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30729961      PMCID: PMC6394201          DOI: 10.1039/c8dt05049j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dalton Trans        ISSN: 1477-9226            Impact factor:   4.390


Introduction

Phosphine-based pincers are a prominent ligand class in contemporary organometallic chemistry and catalysis, conferring thermal stability whilst permitting a wide range of metal-based reactivity.1,2 From a fundamental perspective, their capacity to support the generation of reactive low-coordinate metal fragments provides an attractive framework for gaining insights into the mechanism of small molecule activation reactions. The synthesis and characterisation of a rhodium(i) σ-methane complex in solution is a particularly outstanding example, with direct mechanistic relevance to C(sp3)–H bond activation and alkane dehydrogenation processes mediated at iridium homologues.2,3 Other group 9 highlights include the C(sp2)–H bond oxidative addition of aryl halides4,5 and the selective C(sp3)–F bond activation of fluorocarbons.6 In the context of supporting such endeavours and building on preceding work (Scheme 1),4,7–9 we herein report a convenient method for accessing reactive formally 14 VE rhodium(i) adducts of the widely studied PNP (2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinomethyl)pyridine) and PONOP (2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinito)pyridine) ligands, exploiting metastable coordination of 1,5-cyclooctadiene (COD) in the weakly coordinating 1,2-difluorobenzene solvent (DFB).10 We showcase this methodology for the preparation of previously unknown water complexes and the reversible formation of vinylidene derivatives.
Scheme 1

Latent sources of the {Rh(PNP)}+ and {Rh(PONOP)}+ fragments (X = O, CH2). COE = cyclooctene; COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene.

Results and discussion

As an operationally simple entry point into the organometallic chemistry of cationic rhodium(i) pincer complexes, we targeted substitution reactions of the readily accessible (and commercially available) rhodium precursor [Rh(COD)2][BArF4] (ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3); postulating that alongside chelation of the pincer, steric buttressing from the phosphine substituents would promote efficient liberation of the comparatively bulky COD ligand and access to reactive {Rh(pincer)}+ fragments in solution.11 To this end, stoichiometric reactions between PNP/PONOP and [Rh(COD)2][BArF4] in DFB under an argon atmosphere were first studied in situ, resulting in quantitative coordination of the pincer and establishment of dynamic equilibrium mixtures containing monomeric 1a (PNP, δ 63.4, 52.6, 2JPP ∼320 Hz; PONOP, δ 202.5, 1JRhP = 134 Hz) as the major components and dimeric 1b as the minor components, alongside liberated COD (Scheme 2). The former were formed exclusively when the reactions were repeated in the presence of 10 equivalents of COD, while the latter dications were isolated in high yield by crystallisation from DFB/hexane (PNP, 90%; PONOP, 96%), structurally characterised in the solid state using X-ray diffraction and the bulk purity established by microanalysis (see Fig. 1 for 1b-O).† The synthetic utility of this methodology was then assessed by reacting mixtures of 1a/b, generated as described above in DFB, with CO, H2, and N2 (1 atm) and analysis in situ using 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopy. Introduction of strongly coordinating CO resulted in rapid (t < 5 min) and quantitative formation of the known carbonyl complexes 2a, with only free COD as the by-product.7,8 Reactions of H2 and N2 with 1a/b likewise afforded the corresponding (known) adducts 2b (with concomitant hydrogenation of COD) and 2c,7,8,12 respectively, but under disparately longer timeframes for the PONOP (t ∼ 2 days) compared to PNP complexes (t < 3 h). These reactions all proceeded to completion with the exception of 2c-O (ca. 95%), which instead required use of isolated 1b-O to presumably counter recoordination of COD (t ∼ 2 days).
Scheme 2

Synthesis and reactivity of 1 (X = O, CH2). [BArF4]– counter anions omitted for clarity.

Fig. 1

Solid-state structures of 1b-O and 2d-O. Thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability; anions and most hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity. The starred atoms are generated using the symmetry operation –x, 1 – y, 1 – z. Selected bond lengths (Å): 1b-O: Rh1–Cnt(C4,C5), 2.083(2); cf.1b-CH, Rh1–Cnt(C4,C5), 2.058(2); 2d-O: Rh1–O4, 2.154(2); cf.2d-CH, 2.152(7).

Application of our methodology allows access to novel rhodium(i) pincer adducts of water 2d. PNP variant 2d-CH (δ 63.1, 1JRhP = 144 Hz) was formed quantitatively on addition of excess degassed water (40 equiv.) to an equilibrium mixture of 1a/b-CH generated from stoichiometric reaction between [Rh(COD)2][BArF4] and PNP in DFB (t ∼ 3 h). Consistent with the aforementioned reactivity trends PONOP variant 2d-O (δ 199.1, 1JRhP = 150 Hz) was, however, only formed with 88% conversion after 3 days under these conditions. Analytically pure samples of the 2d-CH (71% yield) and 2d-O (49% yield) were obtained using 1a/b-CH or 1b-O, respectively, and excess water (500 equiv./Rh). The structural formulation of both new aqua complexes was confirmed using a combination of NMR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (see Fig. 1 for 2d-O) and satisfactory microanalysis. The solid-state structures of 2d are notable for and R[combining low line]h[combining low line]–O[combining low line]H2 bond lengths of ca. 2.15 Å and the presence of an additional hydrogen bonded water molecule in the lattice (RhO[combining low line]H2···O[combining low line]H2 = 2.7–2.8 Å).13 As a means of showcasing our new methodology and as part of our work exploring C(sp)–H activation reactions mediated by cationic rhodium(i) pincers,14 we set about studying the reactivity of the associated {Rh(pincer)}+ fragments with two bulky terminal alkynes (Scheme 3). Using isolated 1b-CH as the precursor, reaction with both HCCtBu and HCCAr′ (Ar′ = 3,5-tBu2C6H3) in DFB under an argon atmosphere resulted in rapid (t < 5 min) and quantitative formation of vinylidene derivatives 3a/b-CH, the formation of which was readily apparent due to their striking deep green colours. Both complexes were subsequently isolated from solution and fully characterised in solution and the solid state.† The NMR spectra of 3a/b-CH are notable for the presence of vinylidene 13C resonances at δ 317.5/326.9 (located by HMBC experiments), time-averaged C2v symmetry – reconcilled by free rotation about the RhCC vector – and single phosphorus resonances with large coupling to 103Rh (δ 65.6/65.9, 1JRhP = 139/137 Hz). The solid-state structures affirm the structural assignments and, in addition to the RhC bond lengths of 1.81–1.84 Å that are fully inline with related rhodium precedents,15 notable for the adoption of both C2 (3a-CH, Z′ = 2) and Cs (3a-CH, Z′ = 2; 3b-CH) symmetric pincer ligand conformations; demonstrating the flexibility of lutidene-based pincer backbones.16 In a similar manner, deep blue vinylidene complex 3a-O was obtained from HCCtBu and 1b-O, but over a more protracted time frame than the PNP analogue (ca. 18 h; δ 206.5, 1JRhP = 144 Hz, δ(RhC) 330.0, C2v solution symmetry; Fig. 2). Consistent with the aformetioned trends, the reaction between {Rh(PONOP)}+ and HCCAr′ only resulted in the formation of the green vinylidene derivative 3b-O (δ 208.4, 1JRhP = 143 Hz, δ(RhC) 339.5) as the minor component (30%) of a mixture with the balance made up by the corresponding π-complex [Rh(PONOP)(HCCAr′)][BArF4] (2e-O; δ 194.6. 1JRhP = 129 Hz).17 This ratio was found even in use of excess alkyne and the co-crystallisation of these two compounds (with the ratio reflected in the corresponding crystallographic occupancies) precluded separation in this manner.† 18
Scheme 3

Preparation of vinylidene complexes 3 (X = O, CH2). [BArF4]– counter anions omitted for clarity;  3b-O formed as mixture with the corresponding π-complex 2e-O.

Fig. 2

Solid-state structure of 3a-O. Thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability; anion, most hydrogen atoms and disordered component (vinylidene) omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å): 3a-O: Rh1–C4, 1.865(5); Rh1–C4A, 1.846(4); cf.3a-CH, Rh–C, 1.826(5)–1.840(3); 3b-CH, 1.812(2).18

Curiously, we note reaction of isolated 3 (in the case of 3b-O, as a mixture with 2e-O) with CO (1 atm) resulted in complete conversion to 2a in all cases with concomitant liberation of the corresponding terminal alkynes (t < 90 min). Such reversible vinylidene formation is well documented in ruthenium complexes,19 and in line with related observations we have made when studying C(sp)–H bond activation reactions of cationic rhodium complexes of NHC-based pincer ligands.14

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that reaction between the readily accessible (and commercially available) rhodium precursor [Rh(COD)2][BArF4] and two phosphine-based pincer ligands (2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinomethyl)pyridine and 2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinito)pyridine) in 1,2-F2C6H4 provides a operationally simple method for generating the corresponding {Rh(pincer)}+ fragments, and subsequent synthesis of adducts of CO, H2, N2 and H2O (2). This methodology is underpinned by reversible binding of COD, that leads to dynamic equilibrium mixtures of monomeric [Rh(pincer)(η2-COD)][BArF4] 1a and dimeric [{Rh(pincer)}2(μ–η2:η2-COD)][BArF4]21b, the latter of which were readily isolated by recrystallisation. This methodology was used to study the reaction between {Rh(pincer)}+ and bulky terminal alkynes, which resulted in the (reversible) formation of novel vinylidene derivatives [Rh(pincer)(CCHR)][BArF4] (R = tBu, 3a; 3,5-tBu2C6H3, 3b).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  14 in total

1.  Cyclometalated phosphine-based pincer complexes: mechanistic insight in catalysis, coordination, and bond activation.

Authors:  Milko E van der Boom; David Milstein
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Labile Complexes of the [RuTp(pn)](+) (Tp = Tripyrazolylborate, pn = Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)NMe(2)) Fragment Including the Dinitrogen Ligand(1).

Authors:  Gregor Trimmel; Christian Slugovc; Petra Wiede; Kurt Mereiter; Valentin N. Sapunov; Roland Schmid; Karl Kirchner
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  1997-03-12       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Platinum Group Organometallics Based on "Pincer" Complexes: Sensors, Switches, and Catalysts In memory of Prof. Dr. Luigi M. Venanzi and his pioneering work in organometallic chemistry, particularly in PCP pincer chemistry.

Authors:  Martin Albrecht; Gerard van Koten
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Dehydrogenation of Alkanes and Aliphatic Groups by Pincer-Ligated Metal Complexes.

Authors:  Akshai Kumar; Tariq M Bhatti; Alan S Goldman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Net oxidative addition of C(sp3)-F bonds to iridium via initial C-H bond activation.

Authors:  Jongwook Choi; David Y Wang; Sabuj Kundu; Yuriy Choliy; Thomas J Emge; Karsten Krogh-Jespersen; Alan S Goldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Halobenzenes and Ir(I): kinetic C-H oxidative addition and thermodynamic C-Hal oxidative addition.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Sean Parkin; Oleg V Ozerov
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  A CH2Cl2 complex of a [Rh(pincer)](+) cation.

Authors:  Gemma M Adams; F Mark Chadwick; Sebastian D Pike; Andrew S Weller
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.390

8.  Characterization of a rhodium(I) sigma-methane complex in solution.

Authors:  Wesley H Bernskoetter; Cynthia K Schauer; Karen I Goldberg; Maurice Brookhart
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Selective ortho C-h activation of haloarenes by an Ir(I) system.

Authors:  Eyal Ben-Ari; Mark Gandelman; Haim Rozenberg; Linda J W Shimon; David Milstein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Mononuclear Rh(II) PNP-type complexes. Structure and reactivity.

Authors:  Moran Feller; Eyal Ben-Ari; Tarkeshwar Gupta; Linda J W Shimon; Gregory Leitus; Yael Diskin-Posner; Lev Weiner; David Milstein
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.165

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rhodium(I) Pincer Complexes of Nitrous Oxide.

Authors:  Matthew R Gyton; Baptiste Leforestier; Adrian B Chaplin
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  DFT calculations bring insight to internal alkyne-to-vinylidene transformations at rhodium PNP- and PONOP-pincer complexes.

Authors:  Nasir A Rajabi; Claire L McMullin
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Terminal Alkyne Coupling Reactions Through a Ring: Effect of Ring Size on Rate and Regioselectivity.

Authors:  Caroline M Storey; Matthew R Gyton; Rhiann E Andrew; Adrian B Chaplin
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.236

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.