Literature DB >> 30729722

Physical Therapy-Based Exercise Protocol for Cancer Patients: Evaluating Outcomes for Cardiopulmonary Performance and Cancer-Related Fatigue.

Nancy A Hutchison1, Nikita Deval1, Stacey Rabusch1, Holly Rich1, Tom Kelley1, Nancy Flinn1, Nilanjana Banerji1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that rehabilitation and fitness throughout cancer treatment interventions have been linked to improved outcomes for morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. This study serves to detail the efficacy of the Cancer Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Fitness and Debility (Ca PT) Program in cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical population of cancer patients referred to the Ca PT Program and evaluate the efficacy of the program's therapy protocol in improving cardiopulmonary performance and cancer-related fatigue and pain.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: One hundred two adults who had been referred from a variety of referral sources and supervised individualized exercise programs.
METHODS: Participation in the Ca PT Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was a change in baseline-to-discharge scores in the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), a cardiopulmonary performance measure. The secondary measures were changes in baseline-to-discharge scores of cancer-related fatigue and general pain, measured by patient self-report using a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: 6MWT values were significantly higher at discharge (mean 523 yards) than at baseline (mean 436), (P < .001, r = 0.57). Ninety-two percent of cases showed improvement and 58% of cases had a change on the 6MWT that met threshold for minimal important difference. Quality of life factors, fatigue (P < .001) and pain (P < .001) also significantly improved.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the Ca PT Program yields significant improvement in cardiovascular fitness, fatigue, and pain in people with cancer history. Personalized physical therapy fitness programs for individuals recovering from cancer treatment should be a standard component of cancer intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2019 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30729722     DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  4 in total

1.  Spine Pain and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Defining the Contribution of Nonmalignant Etiologies.

Authors:  Lisa Marie Ruppert; Erica Dayan Cohn; Niamh M Keegan; Abigail Bacharach; Sungmin Woo; Theresa Gillis; Howard I Scher
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Role of physical medicine for cancer rehabilitation and return to work under the premise of the "Wiedereingliederungsteilzeitgesetz".

Authors:  Fadime Cenik; Bruno Mähr; Stefano Palma; Mohammad Keilani; Thomas Nowotny; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  A Secure Occupational Therapy Framework for Monitoring Cancer Patients' Quality of Life.

Authors:  Md Abdur Rahman; Md Mamunur Rashid; Julien Le Kernec; Bruno Philippe; Stuart J Barnes; Francesco Fioranelli; Shufan Yang; Olivier Romain; Qammer H Abbasi; George Loukas; Muhammad Imran
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  The Role of Physical Activity in Cancer Recovery: An Exercise Practitioner's Perspective.

Authors:  Clare M P Roscoe; Andy Pringle; Charlotte Chandler; Mark A Faghy; Ben Barratt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.