Yuli Y Kim1,2, Leah A Goldberg2, Katherine Awh2, Tanmay Bhamare1,2, David Drajpuch2, Adi Hirshberg3, Sara L Partington1,2, Rachel Rogers4, Emily Ruckdeschel1,2, Lynda Tobin1, Morgan Venuti2, Lisa D Levine3. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Maternal and Child Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Biostatistics and Data Management Core, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess performance of risk stratification schemes in predicting adverse cardiac outcomes in pregnant women with congenital heart disease (CHD) and to compare these schemes to clinical factors alone. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: Women ≥18 years with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes indicating CHD who delivered between 1998 and 2014. CARPREG I and ZAHARA risk scores and modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were applied to each woman. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was defined by ≥1 of the following: arrhythmia, heart failure/pulmonary edema, transient ischemic attack, stroke, dissection, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, death during gestation and up to 6 months postpartum. RESULTS: Of 178 women, the most common CHD lesions were congenital aortic stenosis (15.2%), ventricular septal defect (13.5%), atrial septal defect (12.9%), and tetralogy of Fallot (12.9%). Thirty-five women (19.7%) sustained 39 cardiac events. Observed vs expected event rates were 9.9% vs 5% (P = .02) for CARPREG I score 0 and 26.1% vs 7.5% (P < .001) for ZAHARA scores 0.51-1.5. ZAHARA outperformed CARPREG I at predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes (AUC 0.80 vs 0.72, P = .03) but was not significantly better than modified WHO. Clinical predictors of adverse cardiac event were symptoms (P = .002), systemic ventricular dysfunction (P < .001), and subpulmonary ventricular dysfunction (P = .03) with an AUC 0.83 comparable to ZAHARA (P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: CARPREG I and ZAHARA scores underestimate cardiac risk for lower risk pregnancies in these women. Of the three risk schemes, CARPREG I performed least well in predictive capacity. Clinical factors specific to the population studied are comparable to stratification schemes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess performance of risk stratification schemes in predicting adverse cardiac outcomes in pregnant women with congenital heart disease (CHD) and to compare these schemes to clinical factors alone. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: Women ≥18 years with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes indicating CHD who delivered between 1998 and 2014. CARPREG I and ZAHARA risk scores and modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were applied to each woman. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was defined by ≥1 of the following: arrhythmia, heart failure/pulmonary edema, transient ischemic attack, stroke, dissection, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, death during gestation and up to 6 months postpartum. RESULTS: Of 178 women, the most common CHD lesions were congenital aortic stenosis (15.2%), ventricular septal defect (13.5%), atrial septal defect (12.9%), and tetralogy of Fallot (12.9%). Thirty-five women (19.7%) sustained 39 cardiac events. Observed vs expected event rates were 9.9% vs 5% (P = .02) for CARPREG I score 0 and 26.1% vs 7.5% (P < .001) for ZAHARA scores 0.51-1.5. ZAHARA outperformed CARPREG I at predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes (AUC 0.80 vs 0.72, P = .03) but was not significantly better than modified WHO. Clinical predictors of adverse cardiac event were symptoms (P = .002), systemic ventricular dysfunction (P < .001), and subpulmonary ventricular dysfunction (P = .03) with an AUC 0.83 comparable to ZAHARA (P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: CARPREG I and ZAHARA scores underestimate cardiac risk for lower risk pregnancies in these women. Of the three risk schemes, CARPREG I performed least well in predictive capacity. Clinical factors specific to the population studied are comparable to stratification schemes.
Authors: S C Siu; M Sermer; J M Colman; A N Alvarez; L A Mercier; B C Morton; C M Kells; M L Bergin; M C Kiess; F Marcotte; D A Taylor; E P Gordon; J C Spears; J W Tam; K S Amankwah; J F Smallhorn; D Farine; S Sorensen Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-07-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Willem Drenthen; Eric Boersma; Ali Balci; Philip Moons; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Barbara J M Mulder; Hubert W Vliegen; Arie P J van Dijk; Adriaan A Voors; Sing C Yap; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Petronella G Pieper Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Nicole Jastrow; Philippe Meyer; Paul Khairy; Lise-Andrée Mercier; Annie Dore; François Marcotte; Line Leduc Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist; Claudio Borghi; Renata Cifkova; Rafael Ferreira; Jean-Michel Foidart; J Simon R Gibbs; Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf; Bulent Gorenek; Bernard Iung; Mike Kirby; Angela H E M Maas; Joao Morais; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Petronella G Pieper; Patrizia Presbitero; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Maria Schaufelberger; Ute Seeland; Lucia Torracca Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Paul Khairy; David W Ouyang; Susan M Fernandes; Aviva Lee-Parritz; Katherine E Economy; Michael J Landzberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carole A Warnes; Roberta G Williams; Thomas M Bashore; John S Child; Heidi M Connolly; Joseph A Dearani; Pedro del Nido; James W Fasules; Thomas P Graham; Ziyad M Hijazi; Sharon A Hunt; Mary Etta King; Michael J Landzberg; Pamela D Miner; Martha J Radford; Edward P Walsh; Gary D Webb Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephanie L Curtis; Joanna Marsden-Williams; Charlotte Sullivan; Susan M Sellers; Johanna Trinder; Mark Scrutton; A Graham Stuart Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 4.164