Literature DB >> 30729612

International haemovigilance: what have we learned and what do we need to do next?

E M Wood1,2, A L Ang3,4, A Bisht5, P H Bolton-Maggs6,7, A G Bokhorst8, O Flesland9, K Land10,11, J C Wiersum-Osselton8, M R Schipperus8,12, P Tiberghien13,14, B I Whitaker15.   

Abstract

The International Haemovigilance Network (IHN) defines haemovigilance as 'a set of surveillance procedures covering the whole transfusion chain (from the collection of blood and its components to the follow-up of recipients), intended to collect and assess information on unexpected or undesirable effects resulting from the therapeutic use of labile blood products, and to prevent their occurrence or recurrence'. IHN, the International Society of Blood Transfusion and World Health Organization work together to support both developing and established haemovigilance systems. Haemovigilance systems provide valuable data on a range of adverse events related to blood donation and clinical transfusion, from donor syncopal events to transfusion-transmitted infections, immunological complications and the impact of human errors. Harmonised definitions for most adverse reactions have been developed and validated internationally. Definitions of pulmonary complications are again under review. Haemovigilance data have resulted in changes in policy, products and practice, and can complement and inform clinical audit and research, leading to improved blood donor safety, optimised product use and better clinical outcomes after transfusion. However, more work is needed. Not all countries have haemovigilance systems in place. More robust data and careful analysis are required to improve the understanding of the causes, occurrence and clinical outcomes of these events. Wider dissemination of results will facilitate health policy development internationally, and implementation of haemovigilance recommendations will support further important progress in blood safety.
© 2019 British Blood Transfusion Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse reaction; biovigilance; blood transfusion; haemovigilance; human factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30729612     DOI: 10.1111/tme.12582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  5 in total

1.  Vasovagal reactions in whole blood and apheresis donors: a cross-sectional study on donor haemovigilance data from 2016 to 2019 in Italy.

Authors:  Vanessa Piccinini; Giuseppe Marano; Liviana Catalano; Ilaria Pati; Eva Veropalumbo; Chiara de Waure; Simonetta Pupella; Vincenzo De Angelis
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.752

2.  Extracellular vesicle therapeutics from plasma and adipose tissue.

Authors:  Dalila Iannotta; Man Yang; Christian Celia; Luisa Di Marzio; Joy Wolfram
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 18.962

3.  Transfusion medicine: Overtime paradigm changes and emerging paradoxes.

Authors:  O Garraud; T Vuk; M Lozano; J-D Tissot
Journal:  Transfus Clin Biol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 1.406

4.  Nurses' hemovigilance knowledge and performance after teach-back, concept map, and lecture: A quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Daryadokht Masror Roudsari; Shahoo Feizi; Mahtab Maghsudlu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Why Does the Precautionary Principle Suffice for Blood Regulation?

Authors:  Alexandra Seifner; Anthony W Fox
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2021-09-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.