Literature DB >> 30729326

'Negative Ureteroscopy' for Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review.

Patrick Rice1, Sarah Prattley1, Bhaskar K Somani2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While ureteroscopy (URS) is a common procedure for ureteric stones, this window between diagnosis and treatment leaves the possibility for a 'negative', 'stoneless' or 'diagnostic' URS. We perform a systematic review to look at the rate of 'negative ureteroscopy' and risk factors associated with it. RECENT
FINDINGS: From a total of 3599 articles and 68 abstracts, 4 studies (1336 patients) were selected. The negative URS rate varied from 4 to 14%. Common predictors seem to be female gender, small stones, radiolucent stones and distal ureteric stones. Although infrequent, negative ureteroscopy should be avoided in patients with ureteric stones by performing a low-dose CT scan on the day of surgery. This should especially be performed for females and those with smaller, radiolucent or distal ureteric stones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic; Negative; Stone; Stoneless; Ureteric; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30729326     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-019-0878-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  28 in total

1.  Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  A Andrew Ray; Daniela Ghiculete; Kenneth T Pace; R John D'A Honey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Decreasing the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Bhaskar K Somani; A Robertson; Slawomir G Kata
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Predictors for negative ureteroscopy in the management of upper urinary tract stone disease.

Authors:  Jessica E Kreshover; Rian J Dickstein; Courtney Rowe; Richard K Babayan; David S Wang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Diet and fluid prescription in stone disease.

Authors:  E N Taylor; G C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Victoriano Romero; Haluk Akpinar; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

6.  [Cacchi and Ricci's disease. Radiology, epidemiology and biology].

Authors:  E Thomas; Y Witte; J Thomas; G Arvis
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 0.915

7.  Predictive value of current imaging modalities for the detection of urolithiasis during pregnancy: a multicenter, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Wesley M White; Elizabeth B Johnson; Nikki B Zite; John Beddies; Amy E Krambeck; Elias Hyams; Tracy Marien; Ojas Shah; Brian Matlaga; Vernon M Pais
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Current status of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy.

Authors:  Hiro Ishii; Omar M Aboumarzouk; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  This stone (may?) too shall pass.

Authors:  Jennifer Bjazevic
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: lessons learned and outcomes in a Nordic setting.

Authors:  Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy; Peder Gjengstø; Christian Beisland; Øyvind Ulvik
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-08-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.