| Literature DB >> 30728805 |
Magdalena Stasiak1, Bogusław Tymoniuk2, Zbigniew Adamczewski1,3, Bartłomiej Stasiak4, Andrzej Lewiński1,3.
Abstract
Background: Since 1977 the susceptibility to SAT has been known to be HLA-B*35-related in ~70% of patients. Recently it has been demonstrated that SAT is associated with the presence of HLA-B*18:01 and DRB1*01, as well as with HLA-C*04:01. The association between the type of genetic SAT background and sonographic pattern of the disease has never been analyzed. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential correlation between the presence of individual HLA haplotypes and the sonographic SAT pattern, and to provide the US characteristics of the analyzed SAT cases.Entities:
Keywords: HLA-B*18:01; HLA-B*35; HLA-C*04:01; HLA-DRB1*01; subacute thyroiditis; ultrasound
Year: 2019 PMID: 30728805 PMCID: PMC6351437 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Sonographic characteristics of the SAT lesions in each group and comparison with all the other subjects.
| Echogenicity | 0.788 | 0.294 | 0.408 | 0.359 | ||||
| Moderately hypoechoic | 88% | 80% | 100% | 100% | ||||
| Markedly hypoechoic | 12% | 20% | 0% | 0% | ||||
| Strongly heterogeneous | 84% | 0.303 | 80% | 0.880 | 40% | 83.3% | 0.747 | |
| Microcalcifications | 4% | 0.353 | 0% | 0.594 | 0% | 0.724 | 0% | 0.695 |
| Shape | 0.909 | 0.785 | 0.656 | |||||
| Oval | 73.3% | 66.7% | 100% | 0% | ||||
| Patchy | 20% | 33.3% | 0% | 50% | ||||
| Round | 6.7% | 0% | 0% | 50% | ||||
| Margin | 0.937 | 0.572 | 0.602 | 0.062 | ||||
| Blurred | 80% | 100% | 66.7% | 50% | ||||
| Lobulated | 13.3% | 0% | 33.3% | 0% | ||||
| Smooth | 6.7% | 0% | 0% | 50% | ||||
| Bilateral | 84% | 0.170 | 70% | 0.610 | 20% | 100% | 0.141 | |
| Whole lobe affected | 48% | 0.141 | 70% | 0.606 | 80% | 66.7% | 0.777 | |
| Nodule-like pattern | 8% | 0.855 | 10% | 0.869 | 0% | 0.465 | 16.7% | 0.457 |
| Blurred areas | 28% | 0.747 | 40% | 0.257 | 0% | 0.159 | 16.7% | 0.573 |
| Separated areas | 36% | 0.592 | 30% | 0.842 | 60% | 0.166 | 0% | 0.068 |
| No. of areas | 0.506 | |||||||
| Single area | 16% | 10% | 0.389 | 80% | 0% | 0.195 | ||
| Multiple areas | 84% | 90% | 20% | 100% | ||||
| Vascularity | ||||||||
| Decreased | 84% | 0.786 | 90% | 0.486 | 60% | 0.431 | 83.3% | 0.960 |
| Normal or increased | 12% | 0.385 | 0% | 0.270 | 0% | 0.915 | 16.7% | 0.457 |
| Absent | 4% | 0.217 | 10% | 0.869 | 40% | 0.073 | 0.0% | 0.418 |
As compared to all other groups.
p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Group 1. HLA-B*35 and/or HLA-C*04, but without any other of the analyzed antigens;
Group 2. HLA-DRB1*01, regardless of the co-presence of HLA-B*35 or C*04:01, but without B*18:01;
Group 3. HLA-B*18:01 only, without any other analyzed antigen;
Group 4. HLA-B.
Comparison of sonographic features of the SAT lesions in pairs of the analyzed groups.
| Echogenicity | 0.541 | 0.414 | 0.372 | 0.283 | 0.242 | 1.000 |
| Strongly heterogenous | 0.777 | 0.968 | 0.121 | 0.869 | 0.137 | |
| Microcalcifications | 0.521 | 0.649 | 0.618 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Shape | 0.688 | 0.598 | 0.084 | 0.257 | 0.108 | 0.082 |
| Margin | 0.497 | 0.651 | 0.193 | 0.134 | 0.064 | 0.329 |
| Bilateral | 0.350 | 0.294 | 0.067 | 0.137 | ||
| Whole lobe affected | 0.490 | 0.714 | 0.060 | 0.982 | 0.079 | |
| Nodule-like pattern | 0.849 | 0.513 | 0.519 | 0.464 | 0.696 | 0.338 |
| Blurred areas | 0.490 | 0.177 | 0.569 | 0.099 | 0.330 | 0.338 |
| Separated areas | 0.735 | 0.317 | 0.081 | 0.264 | 0.137 | |
| Single/multiple areas | 0.647 | 0.294 | 0.424 | |||
| Vascularity | ||||||
| Decreased | 0.647 | 0.221 | 0.968 | 0.171 | 0.696 | 0.387 |
| Normal | 0.252 | 0.414 | 0.759 | 1.000 | 0.182 | 0.338 |
| Absent | 0.490 | 0.618 | 0.171 | 0.424 | 0.087 | |
p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Group 1. HLA-B*35 and/or HLA-C*04, but without any other of the analyzed antigens;
Group 2. HLA-DRB1*01, regardless of the co-presence of HLA-B*35 or C*04:01, but without B*18:01;
Group 3. HLA-B*18:01 only, without any other analyzed antigen;
Group 4. HLA-B*35 plus B*18, regardless of the presence of any other analyzed antigens.
Figure 1Typical sonographic patterns of SAT in patients with HLA-B*35, C*04:01, and DRB1*01, without HLA-B*18:01. (A) Hypoechoic, strongly heterogeneous, areas with poorly defined margins; (B) hypoechoic blurred areas with decreased or absent vascularization.
Figure 2Different sonographic pattern observed in patient with HLA-B*18:01 only. (A) Homogeneously hypoechoic single area filling the whole right lobe; (B) moderately hypoechoic single SAT area filling the whole thyroid lobe, mimicking a nodule affecting the whole lobe.
Size of the SAT lesions in the analyzed group of patients.
| Group 1 | 38.13 | 16.94 | 9.0 | 70.0 | 0.934 |
| Group 2 | 34.10 | 15.99 | 13.0 | 62.0 | 0.361 |
| Group 3 | 42.40 | 15.66 | 25.0 | 66.0 | 0.564 |
| Group 4 | 42.67 | 14.84 | 19.0 | 63.0 | 0.471 |
*As compared to all other groups.
p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Group 1. HLA-B*35 and/or of HLA-C*04, but without any other of the analyzed antigens;
Group 2. HLA-DRB1*01, regardless of the co-presence of HLA-B*35 or C*04:01, but without B*18:01;
Group 3. HLA-B*18:01 only, without any other analyzed antigen;
Group 4. HLA-B*35 plus B*18, regardless of the presence of any other analyzed antigens.
max, maximum size; min, minimum size; SD, standard deviation.