| Literature DB >> 30728078 |
Xiangjun Kong1, Dongmei Liu2, Jie Zheng1, Aziz Khan1, Bin Li1, Yong Diao1, Ruiyang Zhou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pollen development is an energy-consuming process that particularly occurs during meiosis. Low levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) may cause cell death, resulting in CMS (cytoplasmic male sterility). DNA sequence differences in ATP synthase genes have been revealed between the N- and S-cytoplasms in the cotton CMS system. However, very few data are available at the RNA level. In this study, we compared five ATP synthase genes in the H276A, H276B and fertile F1 (H276A/H268) lines using RNA editing, RNA blotting and quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR) to explore their contribution to CMS. A molecular marker for identifying male sterile cytoplasm (MSC) was also developed.Entities:
Keywords: ATP synthase gene; Cotton; Cytoplasmic male sterility; Molecular marker; RNA editing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30728078 PMCID: PMC6364438 DOI: 10.1186/s40659-019-0212-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Res ISSN: 0716-9760 Impact factor: 5.612
Fig. 1RNA blot of ATP synthase genes. a atp1; b atp4; c atp6; d atp8; e atp9; Lane 1: CMS line H276A; Lane 2: Maintainer line H276B; Lane 3: fertile F1 (H276A/H268)
Comparison of the editing sites detected in five mtDNA genes cotton materials
| Gene | Position | Code | aa change | Editing efficiency (%) | Codon position | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H276A | H276B | F1(H276A/H268) | |||||
|
| 1039 | Ccc | P > S | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
| 1064 | tCg | S > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 1216 | cCt | L > F | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 1292 | cCg | P > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 1415 | cCa | P > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 1484 | cCa | P > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
|
| 115 | Cgt | R > C | 100 | 90.0 | 100 | 1 |
| 212 | tCg | S > L | 83.3 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 221 | ttC | F > F | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | |
| 224 | cCc | P > L | 83.3 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 225 | ccC | P > L | 58.3 | 90.9 | 0 | 3 | |
| 245 | cCt | P > L | 100 | 100 | 91.7 | 2 | |
| 247 | Ccg | P > L | 50 | 27.2 | 100 | 1 | |
| 248 | cCg | P > L | 91.7 | 100 | 91.7 | 2 | |
| 392 | tCa | S > L | 83.3 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 404 | cCa | P > L | 83.3 | 100 | 91.7 | 2 | |
| 413 | aCt | T > I | 83.3 | 100 | 91.7 | 2 | |
| 489 | ccC | P > P | 83.3 | 90.9 | 91.7 | 3 | |
|
| 106 | Cca | P > S | 63.6 | 63.6 | 90.9 | 1 |
| 242 | cCg | P > L | 54.5 | 45.5 | 63.6 | 2 | |
| 294 | ttC | F > F | 0 | 18.2 | 45.5 | 3 | |
| 305 | tCg | S > L | 45.5 | 54.5 | 72.7 | 2 | |
| 323 | tCg | S > L | 45.5 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 2 | |
| 331 | Cgt | R > C | 63.6 | 54.5 | 54.5 | 1 | |
| 338 | cCc | P > L | 36.4 | 54.5 | 63.6 | 2 | |
| 339 | ccC | P > L | 18.2 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 3 | |
| 733 | Cat | H > Y | 72.7 | 72.7 | 81.8 | 1 | |
| 740 | tCt | S > F | 45.5 | 63.6 | 72.7 | 2 | |
| 787 | tCt | Q > * | 63.6 | 45.5 | 81.8 | 1 | |
|
| 58 | Ctc | L > F | 100 | 84.6 | 100 | 1 |
| 76 | Cca | P > L | 100 | 100 | 93.3 | 1 | |
| 77 | cCa | P > L | 100 | 100 | 93.3 | 2 | |
| 443 | cCa | P > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
|
| 20 | tCa | S > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| 50 | tCa | S > L | 85.7 | 93.3 | 100 | 2 | |
| 182 | tCg | S > L | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 191 | cCa | P > L | 92.6 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 205 | Ctg | L > L | 85.7 | 86.7 | 92.9 | 1 | |
| 215 | tCc | S > F | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 | |
| 223 | Cga | R > * | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
| 243 | ttC | F > F | 35.7 | 66.7 | 50 | 3 | |
Position, respect to ATG. Code, capital word represents RNA editing site in code. All the editing forms are C-U conversion
Fig. 2Amino acid conversions resulting from RNA editing events; n = 41
The frequency of hydrophilic/hydrophobic amino acid changed as a result of RNA editing
| Amino acid changed | Number | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrophobic to hydrophobic | 23 | 62.16 |
| Hydrophilic to hydrophobic | 12 | 32.43 |
| Hydrophobic to hydrophilic | 2 | 5.41 |
| Hydrophilic to hydrophilic | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 100 |
Statistic didn’t contain Q > *, R > * and two R > C
Fig. 3Expression analysis of five genes in cotton anthers by qRT-PCR. The housekeeping gene 18S was used as an internal control; H276A, CMS line; H276B, maintainer line; and H276A/H268, F1 plants from the descendant of restorer H268 hybridized with H276A. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). Double asterisk represents significance at 1% probability
Fig. 4Identification accuracy of the molecular marker. M:10 bp DNA ladder; Lane 1–15: NL11-3A, NL11-3B, NL11-3A/H268, NL11-4A, NL11-4B, NL11-4A/H268, NL11-5A, NL11-5B, NL11-5A/H268, NL11-8A, NL11-8B, NL11-8A/H268, NL11-9A, NL11-9B, and NL11-9A/H268; Lane 16–30: NL11-21A, NL11-21B, NL11-21A/H268, J-1A, J-1B, J-1A/H268, J-4A, J-4B, J-4/H268, NL11-26A, NL11-26B, NL11-26A/H268, H276A, H276B, and H276A/H268