| Literature DB >> 30728067 |
Abdul-Razak Abizari1, Zakari Ali2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of single nutrients or foods does not normally reflect the diet of population groups. Dietary pattern analyses are useful in understanding the overall diet and its relationship with disease conditions. The objective of the present study was to determine the dietary patterns and associated factors among schooling adolescents in Northern Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Anthropometric status; Dietary pattern; Ghana; School children
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30728067 PMCID: PMC6364425 DOI: 10.1186/s41043-019-0162-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Background characteristics of participating pupils (n = 366)
| Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 182 | 49.7 |
| Female | 184 | 50.3 |
| Age (years) | ||
| ≤ 15 | 175 | 47.8 |
| > 15 | 191 | 52.2 |
| Class of pupil | ||
| JHS 1 | 188 | 51.4 |
| JHS 2 | 178 | 48.6 |
| Anthropometric status (BMI-for-age) | ||
| Underweight | 23 | 6.3 |
| Normal | 321 | 87.7 |
| Overweight/obese | 22 | 6.0 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Dagomba | 319 | 87.2 |
| Gonja | 26 | 7.1 |
| Others | 21 | 5.7 |
| Live with parents? | ||
| Yes | 287 | 78.4 |
| Family type | ||
| Nuclear | 152 | 41.5 |
| Extended | 214 | 58.5 |
| Go to school with pocket money | ||
| Yes | 339 | 92.6 |
| Father’s education | ||
| None | 195 | 53.3 |
| Primary/junior high school | 98 | 26.8 |
| Senior high school/tertiary | 73 | 19.9 |
| Father’s occupation | ||
| Farmer | 120 | 32.8 |
| Trader | 74 | 20.2 |
| Civil servant | 33 | 9.0 |
| Others | 139 | 38.0 |
| Mother’s education | ||
| None | 256 | 69.9 |
| Primary/junior high school | 83 | 22.7 |
| Senior high school/tertiary | 27 | 7.4 |
| Mother’s occupation | ||
| Farmer | 35 | 9.6 |
| Trader | 261 | 71.3 |
| Civil servant | 6 | 1.6 |
| Others | 64 | 17.5 |
| Household wealth quintile | ||
| Poorest | 74 | 20.2 |
| Poor | 76 | 20.8 |
| Medium | 70 | 19.1 |
| Wealthy | 73 | 19.9 |
| Wealthiest | 73 | 19.9 |
Dietary patterns of participating pupils
| Food items | Dietary patterns with factor loadings | Communalities | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweet tooth | Traditional | ||
| Milk and milk products |
| .087 | .648 |
| Fruits and fruit juice |
| .251 | .635 |
| Meat, poultry, and eggs |
| .153 | .584 |
| Energy and soft drinks |
| .206 | .510 |
| Tubers and plantain |
| .243 | .464 |
| Sugared snacks |
| .293 | .478 |
| Sweets |
| .307 | .460 |
| Fats, oils, and fat-based foods |
| .377 | .486 |
| Tea and coffee |
| .056 | .332 |
| Fish and seafood | − .077 |
| .564 |
| Nuts, seeds, and legumes | .287 |
| .630 |
| Local sugared beverages |
|
| .467 |
| Vegetables | .203 |
| .316 |
| Cereals and grains |
|
| .378 |
|
| 32.516 | 17.156 | |
|
| 49.672 | ||
Extraction method, principal component analysis. Rotation method, varimax with Kaiser normalization. Italic factor loadings are items contributing significantly to each PCA component
Bivariate analysis of the predictors of dietary patterns of participating pupils
| Predictor | Dietary pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweet tooth | Traditional | |||||
| Low (183) | High (183) | Low (183) | High (183) | |||
| Sex | 0.210 | 0.676 | ||||
| Male | 85 (46.7) | 97 (53.3) | 89 (48.9) | 93 (51.1) | ||
| Female | 98 (53.3) | 86 (46.7) | 94 (51.1) | 90 (48.9) | ||
| Age (years) | 0.917 | 0.464 | ||||
| ≤ 15 | 88 (50.3) | 87 (49.7) | 91 (52.0) | 84 (48.0) | ||
| > 15 | 95 (49.7) | 96 (50.3) | 92 (48.2) | 99 (51.8) | ||
| Live with parents |
| 0.899 | ||||
| Yes | 134 (46.7) | 153 (53.3) | 144 (50.2) | 143 (49.8) | ||
| No | 49 (62.0) | 30 (38.0) | 39 (49.4) | 40 (50.6) | ||
| Pocket money to school |
| 0.842 | ||||
| Yes | 160 (47.2) | 179 (52.8) | 170 (50.1) | 169 (49.9) | ||
| No | 23 (85.2) | 4 (14.8) | 13 (48.1) | 14 (51.9) | ||
| Dietary diversity (food groups) | 0.074 |
| ||||
| < 5 | 27 (62.8) | 16 (37.2) | 28 (65.1) | 15 (34.9) | ||
| ≥ 5 | 156 (48.3) | 167 (51.7) | 155 (48.0) | 168 (52.0) | ||
| Nutritional status | 0.320 | 0.358 | ||||
| Underweight | 10 (43.5) | 13 (56.5) | 10 (43.5) | 13 (56.5) | ||
| Normal | 165 (51.4) | 156 (48.6) | 159 (49.5) | 162 (50.5) | ||
| Overweight/obese | 8 (36.4) | 14 (63.6) | 14 (63.6) | 8 (36.4) | ||
| Father’s educational level |
| 0.858 | ||||
| None | 107 (54.9) | 88 (45.1) | 95 (48.7) | 100 (51.3) | ||
| Primary/junior high school | 49 (50.0) | 49 (50.0) | 51 (52.0) | 47 (48.0) | ||
| Senior high/tertiary | 27 (37.0) | 46 (63.0) | 37 (50.7) | 36 (49.3) | ||
| Father’s occupation |
| 0.392 | ||||
| Agriculture/farming | 66 (55.0) | 54 (45.0) | 64 (53.3) | 56 (46.7) | ||
| Trader | 39 (52.7) | 35 (47.3) | 32 (43.2) | 42 (56.8) | ||
| Civil servant | 7 (21.2) | 26 (78.8) | 14 (42.4) | 19 (57.6) | ||
| Others | 71 (51.1) | 68 (48.9) | 73 (52.5) | 66 (47.5) | ||
| Mother’s educational level | 0.392 | 0.592 | ||||
| None | 134 (52.3) | 122 (47.7) | 127 (49.6) | 129 (50.4) | ||
| Primary/junior high school | 37 (44.6) | 46 (55.4) | 40 (59.3) | 43 (51.8) | ||
| Senior high/tertiary | 12 (44.4) | 15 (55.6) | 16 (59.3) | 11 (40.7) | ||
| Mother’s occupation | 0.170 | 0.859 | ||||
| Agriculture/farming | 23 (65.7) | 12 (34.3) | 17 (48.6) | 18 (51.4) | ||
| Trader | 124 (47.5) | 137 (52.5) | 131 (50.2) | 130 (49.8) | ||
| Civil servant | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | ||
| Others | 34 (53.1) | 30 (46.9) | 33 (51.6) | 31 (48.4) | ||
| Wealth quintile |
|
| ||||
| Poorest | 48 (64.9) | 26 (35.1) | 47 (63.5) | 27 (36.5) | ||
| Poor | 48 (63.2) | 28 (36.8) | 38 (50.0) | 38 (50.0) | ||
| Medium | 35 (50.0) | 35 (50.0) | 38 (54.3) | 32 (45.7) | ||
| Wealthy | 32 (43.8) | 41 (56.2) | 37 (50.7) | 36 (49.3) | ||
| Wealthiest | 20 (27.4) | 53 (72.6) | 23 (31.5) | 50 (68.5) | ||
Predictors with p values in italics are statistically significant
Logistic regression analysis of the determinants of high STP and TP among pupils
| AOR | 95% CI for AOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Sweet tooth pattern (STP) | ||||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1.12 | 0.644 | 0.70 | 1.80 |
| Female | 1 | |||
| Live with parents? | ||||
| Yes | 1.95 |
| 1.11 | 3.40 |
| No | 1 | |||
| Pocket money to school? | ||||
| Yes | 4.73 |
| 1.49 | 14.99 |
| No | 1 | |||
| Dietary diversity (food groups) | ||||
| Less than 5 | 0.76 | 0.460 | 0.37 | 1.57 |
| Above 5 | 1 | |||
| Father’s educational level | 0.803 | |||
| None | 0.85 | 0.650 | 0.42 | 1.72 |
| Primary/junior high school | 0.78 | 0.510 | 0.37 | 1.63 |
| Senior high/tertiary | 1 | |||
| Mother’s occupation | 0.972 | |||
| Agriculture/farming | 0.84 | 0.728 | 0.32 | 2.23 |
| Trader | 0.97 | 0.925 | 0.53 | 1.77 |
| Civil servant | 0.71 | 0.733 | 0.10 | 5.19 |
| Others | 1 | |||
| Father’s occupation | 0.173 | |||
| Agriculture/farming | 1.09 | 0.768 | 0.61 | 1.96 |
| Trader | 0.83 | 0.563 | 0.45 | 1.54 |
| Civil servant | 3.04 |
| 1.03 | 8.98 |
| Others | 1 | |||
| Household wealth | 0.004 | |||
| Wealthiest | 3.40 |
| 1.55 | 7.46 |
| Wealthy | 1.59 | 0.218 | 0.76 | 3.35 |
| Medium | 1.35 | 0.430 | 0.64 | 2.86 |
| Poor | 0.86 | 0.685 | 0.42 | 1.77 |
| Poorest | 1 | |||
| Traditional pattern (TP) | ||||
| Household wealth | 0.008 | |||
| Wealthiest | 3.52 |
| 1.76 | 7.02 |
| Wealthy | 1.62 | 0.156 | 0.83 | 3.14 |
| Medium | 1.38 | 0.348 | 0.70 | 2.71 |
| Poor | 1.68 | 0.120 | 0.87 | 3.25 |
| Poorest | 1 | |||
| Dietary diversity (food groups) | ||||
| Less than 5 | 0.57 | 0.103 | 0.29 | 1.12 |
| Above 5 | 1 | |||
Predictors with p values in italics are statistically significant