Literature DB >> 30725536

Leveraging marginal structural modeling with Cox regression to assess the survival benefit of accepting vs declining kidney allograft offers.

Jordana B Cohen1,2, Vishnu Potluri1, Paige M Porrett3, Ruohui Chen2, Marielle Roselli2, Justine Shults2, Deirdre L Sawinski1, Peter P Reese1,2.   

Abstract

Existing studies evaluating the survival benefit of kidney transplantation were unable to incorporate time-updated information on decisions related to each organ offer. We used national registry data, including organ turndown data, to evaluate the survival benefit of accepting vs turning down kidney offers in candidates waitlisted from 2007-2013. Among candidates who declined their first offer, only 43% ultimately received organ transplantations. Recipients who later underwent organ transplantation after declining their first offer had markedly longer wait times than recipients who accepted their first offer, and 56% received kidney transplants that were of similar or lower quality compared to their initial offer. In marginal structural modeling analyses accounting for time-updated offer characteristics (including Kidney Donor Profile Index, Public Health System risk status, and pumping), after 3 months posttransplant, there was a significant survival benefit of accepting an offer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.89) that was similar among diabetics, candidates aged >65 years, and candidates living in donor service areas with the longest waitlist times. After carefully accounting for the effect of donor quality, we confirm that the survival benefit of accepting an organ offer is clinically meaningful and persistent beyond 3 months post-kidney transplantation, including high-risk subgroups of organ transplantation candidates.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; donors and donation: deceased; epidemiology; kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ acceptance; organ procurement and allocation; patient survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30725536      PMCID: PMC6591028          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  23 in total

1.  Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.

Authors:  J M Robins; M A Hernán; B Brumback
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.

Authors:  Babette A Brumback; Miguel A Hernán; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; James M Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Do OSCAR winners live longer than less successful peers? A reanalysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Sylvestre; Ella Huszti; James A Hanley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  An easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimation.

Authors:  Jan Beyersmann; Petra Gastmeier; Martin Wolkewitz; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Survivor treatment bias, treatment selection bias, and propensity scores in observational research.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Robert W Platt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Merion; Valarie B Ashby; Robert A Wolfe; Dale A Distant; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Robert A Metzger; Akinlolu O Ojo; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  4 in total

1.  Personalizing Donor Kidney Selection: Choosing the Right Donor for the Right Recipient.

Authors:  David P Foley; Deirdre Sawinski
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Personalizing the Kidney Transplant Decision: Who Doesn't Benefit from a Kidney Transplant?

Authors:  Deirdre Sawinski; David P Foley
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Mortality and Hepatic Decompensation in Patients With Cirrhosis and Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Marina Serper; Ethan M Weinberg; Jordana B Cohen; Peter P Reese; Tamar H Taddei; David E Kaplan
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Assessment of the Utility of Kidney Histology as a Basis for Discarding Organs in the United States: A Comparison of International Transplant Practices and Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Olivier Aubert; Maarten Naesens; Edmund Huang; Vishnu Potluri; Dirk Kuypers; Antoine Bouquegneau; Gillian Divard; Marc Raynaud; Yassine Bouatou; Ashley Vo; Denis Glotz; Christophe Legendre; Carmen Lefaucheur; Stanley Jordan; Jean-Philippe Empana; Xavier Jouven; Alexandre Loupy
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 10.121

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.