Literature DB >> 30725192

Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Martin Hufeland1, Sabrina Wicke2, Pablo E Verde3, Rüdiger Krauspe2, Thilo Patzer2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Currently there exists no clear evidence concerning the surgical treatment of LHB lesions with either tenotomy or tenodesis. The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate elbow flexion and forearm supination force as well as the biceps muscle distalization according to both techniques in isolated LHB lesions.
METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 40-70 years with shoulder arthroscopies for isolated SLAP or biceps pulley lesions were prospectively randomized to arthroscopic suprapectoral intraosseous LHB tenodesis or tenotomy. Pre-, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the SST, ASES, Constant-Murley and LHB scores were recorded. The elbow flexion force was measured in 10°/90° flexion, the supination force in neutral/pronation position. In addition, the maximum upper-arm circumference and its position relative to the radial epicondyle of the humerus were evaluated preoperatively and in follow-up.
RESULTS: 20/22 patients (mean age 52.0 ± 8.5; range 36-63 years, 11 male) completed the follow-up. 9/20 were treated with LHB tenodesis (mean age 51.5 ± 9.5; range 37-63 years, 7 male) and 11/20 with tenotomy (mean age 52.8 ± 8.0; range 36-62 years, 4 male). The force measurements and scores showed no significant difference after 12 months. Tenodesis achieved a significant increase in force 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. One tenodesis patient and three tenotomy patients showed a postoperative popeye-sign deformity.
CONCLUSION: This prospective randomized study comparing LHB tenodesis and tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions has shown no significant difference in elbow flexion and forearm supination force and clinical scores after 12 months. After LHB tenotomy, there was a non-significant trend for a higher rate of popeye-sign deformities of the upper arm and biceps muscle cramps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biceps; Biceps pulley lesion; SLAP lesion; Tenodesis; Tenotomy; Thrower shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30725192     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03136-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  18 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Elise Loock; Aude Michelet; Amaury D'Utruy; Pierre Molinazzi; Gerjon Hannink; Simon Bertiaux; Olivier Courage
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Comparison of the effectiveness of the long head of the biceps tendon with or without proximal amputation after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff].

Authors:  Xing Feng; Changjian Chen; Liang Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Outcomes of Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of Patients From a Large Multicenter Database.

Authors:  Ramesh C Srinivasan; Kevin A Hao; Thomas W Wright; Kevin W Farmer; Jonathan O Wright; Ryan P Roach; Michael W Moser; Michael C Freidl; Marissa Pazik; Joseph J King
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Long head of biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Abdulaziz F Ahmed; Ammar Toubasi; Shady Mahmoud; Ghalib O Ahmed; Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari; Bashir A Zikria
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-22

Review 5.  [Injuries of the biceps-labrum complex : Principles, pathologies and treatment concepts].

Authors:  N Hawi; P Habermeyer; R Meller; S Razaeian; C von Falck; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Tenodesis yields better functional results than tenotomy in long head of the biceps tendon operations-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  László Bucsi; Károly Schandl; Mátyás Vajda; Lajos Szakó; Péter Hegyi; Bálint Erőss; Anikó Görbe; Zsolt Molnár; Kincső Kozma; Gergő Józsa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.479

7.  Increased Risk of Humeral Fracture With Open Versus Arthroscopic Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii.

Authors:  Robert L Parisien; David P Trofa; H P Kang; Hasani W Swindell; Nicholas Trasolini; Xinning Li; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-16

8.  All-Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Using the Anterolateral Anchor During Concomitant Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Mitchell Meghpara; William Schulz; Elan Golan; Dharmesh Vyas
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-12-18

9.  Does Biceps Tenotomy or Tenodesis Have Better Results After Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julia Pozzetti Daou; Dan Yuta Nagaya; Fabio Teruo Matsunaga; Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Combined With Modified Superior Capsule Reconstruction as Reinforcement by the Long Head of the Biceps.

Authors:  Chen Hao Chiang; Leo Shaw; Wei Hsing Chih; Ming Long Yeh; Wei Ren Su
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.