Background: Despite the role of one's hands in human function and quality of life, financial disincentives to perform common hand procedures in patients with government-sponsored insurance plans may lead to longer wait times and decreased access to care. Here, we identify the variations in reimbursement for 4 common hand procedures as a step toward understanding these financial implications to develop safeguards to minimize effects on access to care. Methods: Billing data were collected over a 10-year period for patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (open, Current Procedural Terminology 64721; endoscopic, 29848), cubital tunnel release (64718), ganglion cyst excision (25111), and interposition arthroplasty (25447). Patients were placed into cohorts according to insurance type-private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or worker's compensation-and these were directly compared. Results: A total of 3489 procedures between 2005 and 2015 were identified in this study (carpal tunnel 65.8%, cubital tunnel 28.7%, ganglion cyst excision 4.1%, and interposition arthroplasty 13.8%). In all, 54.7% of patients had private insurance; 26.3%, Medicare; 10.5%, worker's compensation; and 8.5%, Medicaid. Reimbursement, as a percentage of charge, differed significantly by payor type for all cases and by procedure. On average, worker's compensation plans reimbursed 65.5% of submitted charges; private insurance, 50.6%; Medicare, 25.1%; and Medicaid, 24.6%. Conclusions: We found that wide variations in reimbursement for common hand procedures exist and may preclude some surgeons from offering certain procedures to a subset of patients. Understanding these discrepancies is a key first step in minimizing a potential care delivery disparity for this patient population.
Background: Despite the role of one's hands in human function and quality of life, financial disincentives to perform common hand procedures in patients with government-sponsored insurance plans may lead to longer wait times and decreased access to care. Here, we identify the variations in reimbursement for 4 common hand procedures as a step toward understanding these financial implications to develop safeguards to minimize effects on access to care. Methods: Billing data were collected over a 10-year period for patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (open, Current Procedural Terminology 64721; endoscopic, 29848), cubital tunnel release (64718), ganglion cyst excision (25111), and interposition arthroplasty (25447). Patients were placed into cohorts according to insurance type-private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or worker's compensation-and these were directly compared. Results: A total of 3489 procedures between 2005 and 2015 were identified in this study (carpal tunnel 65.8%, cubital tunnel 28.7%, ganglion cyst excision 4.1%, and interposition arthroplasty 13.8%). In all, 54.7% of patients had private insurance; 26.3%, Medicare; 10.5%, worker's compensation; and 8.5%, Medicaid. Reimbursement, as a percentage of charge, differed significantly by payor type for all cases and by procedure. On average, worker's compensation plans reimbursed 65.5% of submitted charges; private insurance, 50.6%; Medicare, 25.1%; and Medicaid, 24.6%. Conclusions: We found that wide variations in reimbursement for common hand procedures exist and may preclude some surgeons from offering certain procedures to a subset of patients. Understanding these discrepancies is a key first step in minimizing a potential care delivery disparity for this patient population.
Entities:
Keywords:
carpal tunnel; cubital tunnel; disparity; ganglion cyst; hand surgery; health care reform; insurance; payor mix; reimbursement
Authors: Chang-Yeon Kim; Daniel H Wiznia; Yuexin Wang; Ameya V Save; Nidharshan S Anandasivam; Carrie R Swigart; Richard R Pelker Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2016-02-20 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Karin V Rhodes; Genevieve M Kenney; Ari B Friedman; Brendan Saloner; Charlotte C Lawson; David Chearo; Douglas Wissoker; Daniel Polsky Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Nidharshan S Anandasivam; Daniel H Wiznia; Chang-Yeon Kim; Ameya V Save; Jonathan N Grauer; Richard R Pelker Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jeffrey B Friedrich; Louis H Poppler; Christopher D Mack; Frederick P Rivara; L Scott Levin; Matthew B Klein Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Ryan P Calfee; Chirag M Shah; Colin D Canham; Ambrose H W Wong; Richard H Gelberman; Charles A Goldfarb Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: William Baker; Michael Rivlin; Samir Sodha; Michael Nakashian; Brian Katt; Daniel Fletcher; Kevin Lutsky; Pedro Beredjiklian Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2020-10-27
Authors: Peter G Brodeur; Devan D Patel; Aron H Licht; David H Loftus; Aristides I Cruz; Joseph A Gil Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-11-24