Linlin Xu1,2, Danye Liu1,2, Dong Chen1,3, Hui Liu1,3, Jun Yang1,2,3,4. 1. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China. 3. Center for Mesoscience, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. 4. Zhongke Langfang Institute of Process Engineering, Fenghua Road No 1, Langfang Economic & Technical Development Zone, Hebei Province 065001, China.
Abstract
Controlling of the size and/or shape of noble metal nanoparticles (NMNPs) is crucial to make use of their unique properties and to optimize their performance for a given application. Within the past decades, the development of wet-chemistry methods enables fine tailoring of the size and morphology of NMNPs. We herein devote this review to introduce the wet-chemistry-based methods for the size and shape-controlled synthesis of rhodium (Rh) NPs. We start with a summarization of the wet-chemistry-based approaches developed for producing Rh NPs and then focus on recent fascinating advances in their size- and shape-control in the aspects of kinetic and thermodynamic regimes depending on the synthetic conditions. Then, we use several typical examples to showcase the applications of Rh NPs with tunable sizes and shapes. Finally, we make some perspectives for the further research trends and development of Rh NPs. We hope through this reviewing effort, one can easily understand the technical bases for effectively designing and producing Rh NPs with desired properties.
Controlling of the size and/or shape of noble metal nanoparticles (NMNPs) is crucial to make use of their unique properties and to optimize their performance for a given application. Within the past decades, the development of wet-chemistry methods enables fine tailoring of the size and morphology of NMNPs. We herein devote this review to introduce the wet-chemistry-based methods for the size and shape-controlled synthesis of rhodium (Rh) NPs. We start with a summarization of the wet-chemistry-based approaches developed for producing Rh NPs and then focus on recent fascinating advances in their size- and shape-control in the aspects of kinetic and thermodynamic regimes depending on the synthetic conditions. Then, we use several typical examples to showcase the applications of Rh NPs with tunable sizes and shapes. Finally, we make some perspectives for the further research trends and development of Rh NPs. We hope through this reviewing effort, one can easily understand the technical bases for effectively designing and producing Rh NPs with desired properties.
Noble metal nanoparticles (NMNPs) with controlled sizes and shapes have increased scientific interest and technological significance owing to their unique physical/chemical properties and wide applications in catalysis, photonics, sensing, energy conversion/storage, and bio-medicine [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Typically, the tunable sizes and shapes of NMNPs would determine their catalytic behavior in terms of activity, selectivity, and durability, through the adjustment of the number and geometric structure of the active sites [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. In general, the high activity is associated with the large surface-to-volume ratio induced by small particle sizes. However, in some cases, the nanoparticles with appropriate bigger sizes may show better performance than that of the smaller ones. For example, Somorjai et al. demonstrated that the CO oxidation activity increases with the increase of the nanoparticle sizes, and 6-nm Ru NPs shows 8-fold higher activity than that of the 2 nm particles [14]. In addition, the intrinsic properties of most nanomaterials are also strongly dependent on their shapes [15, 16, 17, 18]. The catalytic performance is often attributed to the presence or absence of certain crystallographic planes associated with a particular shape, including exposed facets, as well as their associated atomic steps, corners, and defects [19, 20, 21]. Therefore, Engineering the size and shape of NMNPs is the keys to achieve their optimal performance for given technological applications.Recently, significant progresses have been made for the size- and shape-control of NMNPs by tuning the crystal growth kinetics in numerous wet-chemistry approaches. Among various NMNPs, rhodium (Rh) is particularly known for its critical role in diverse catalytic reactions, such as CO oxidation [22, 23, 24, 25], NO reduction [26, 27, 28], hydrogenation [29, 30, 31, 32, 33], hydroformylation [34, 35, 36], and electro-oxidation [37, 38, 39, 40]. Moreover, Rh-based catalysts are especially stable for use under harsh reaction conditions because of its strong resistance to the etching of acid/base and heat. In order to maximize its catalytic performance, size- and shape-controlled synthesis of Rh NPs have obtained a wide range of researches in recent years [41, 42]. However, compared to other noble metals such as Au, Ag, Pt, and Pd, there are far fewer strategies reported on size- and shape-control of Rh NPs due to their extraordinarily high surface free energy [42]. Comprehensive review studies that summarize the synthetic methods of Rh NPs with size and shape control have also rarely been reported. Therefore, we intend to provide an overview to present the recent progresses in size- and shape-controlled synthesis of Rh NPs and their associated catalytic applications, with the majority of cited references from 2010 and afterwards.In this review, we begin with an introduction of the wet-chemistry-based approaches developed for producing Rh NPs with tunable sizes and shapes, followed by their applications in various catalytic reactions. Finally, we make some perspectives for the further research trends and development of Rh NPs so as to provide the readers a systematic and coherent picture of this promising field.
Main text
Preparation methods for Rh NPs
The wet-chemistry methods are versatile towards the synthesis of different kinds of NMNPs, and both size and shape of NMNPs can be well controlled by manipulating the reaction kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. In recent years, the size and/or shape control of Rh NPs have been paid much attention by tuning the crystal growth kinetics in various wet-chemistry approaches, including modified polyol methods [15, 43], seeded growth methods [44, 45], organometallic approaches [46], electrochemical square-wave-potential routes [47], and template-directed methods [48, 49]. In this section, we emphasize a number of mainstream synthetic methods, and specific strategies for size/shape tailoring will be depicted in the next sections.
Synthesis of Rh NPs by polyol reduction
In recent years, a lot of research has been done on the formation of NMNPs using the polyol process, which is one of the most commonly used solution-based approaches to colloidal NMNPs for plasmonic and catalytic applications [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]. To produce a metal colloid, an organic metal compound or salt precursor is heated, usually in the presence of stabilizers, in high boiling polyols as solvents as well as reducing agents. Toshima and coworkers firstly reported their observation of a colloidal dispersion of branched Rh NPs in the late 1970s [57]. Rh NPs of 40 Å in diameter, which are effective for hydrogenation of cyclohexene, were prepared by refluxing the mixture of poly(vinyl alcohol) and RhCl3 in methanol-water. Afterwards, liquid polyols have been proven to be suitable agents to reduce metal salts for the synthesis of monodispersed Rh particles with sizes in the nanometer scope.As shown in Fig. 1, Xia et al. demonstrated the preparation of Rh multipods in large quantities by polyol reduction [15]. They also explored the influence of precursor concentration, reaction time, and temperature on the stability and morphology of Rh NPs. In a typical synthesis, ethylene glycol (EG) was placed in a three-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic stirrer bar and heated in air (or Ar) at a designated temperature for 1.5 h. In separate vials, Na3RhCl6 and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) were each dissolved in EG at room temperature. The molar ratio of Na3RhCl6 to the repeating unit of PVP was controlled at 1:5. These two solutions in EG were injected simultaneously into the heated EG using a syringe pump at a rate of 0.2 mL min−1 for the formation of Rh NPs.
Fig. 1
TEM images showing the effects of temperature and the concentration of the precursor on the formation of branched Rh NPs: (a) 25 mM Na3RhCl6 at 110 °C, (b) 25 mM Na3RhCl6 at 180 °C, (c) 5 mM Na3RhCl6 at 140 °C, (d) 50 mM Na3RhCl6 at 140 °C (Adapted with permission from [15]. Copyright 2006, Wiley-VCH).
TEM images showing the effects of temperature and the concentration of the precursor on the formation of branched Rh NPs: (a) 25 mM Na3RhCl6 at 110 °C, (b) 25 mM Na3RhCl6 at 180 °C, (c) 5 mM Na3RhCl6 at 140 °C, (d) 50 mM Na3RhCl6 at 140 °C (Adapted with permission from [15]. Copyright 2006, Wiley-VCH).Recently, Schaak et al. modified the polyol synthesis and achieved the synthesis of nanometer sized Rh cubes, icosahedra, and triangular plates using bromide, trifluoroacetate, and chloride ligands, respectively [58], as shown in Fig. 2. Taking the heat-up synthesis of Rh icosahedra from molecular precursors as an example, the Rh precursors and PVP stabilizer were dissolved in polyol solvent using a 65 °C water bath, and NaCOOCF3 [8:1 ratio with Rh2(COOCF3)4] was also added. The mixed solution was stirred vigorously in a three-necked flask containing a condenser and septum, and the temperature was maintained using a digital controller. The solution was heated to a temperature for 15 min at which particle nucleation begins, as evidenced by a darkening of the color. Then the solution was heated to a focusing temperature for 75 min, causing the solution color to darken further, indicating the formation of Rh NPs with desired morphologies.
Fig. 2
TEM images showing aliquots taken during the heat-up synthesis of Rh cubes from RhBr3 in DEG (a–d), icosahedra from Rh2(COOCF3)4 in EG (e–h), and triangular plates from RhCl3 in TREG (i–l). Aliquots were collected at (a, e, i) the temperature corresponding to the visible onset of particle nucleation, (b, f, j) after 15 min maintaining that temperature, (c, g, k) upon increasing the temperature 30–40 °C, and (d, h, l) after 75 min of focusing at that temperature (Adapted with permission from [58]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society).
TEM images showing aliquots taken during the heat-up synthesis of Rh cubes from RhBr3 in DEG (a–d), icosahedra from Rh2(COOCF3)4 in EG (e–h), and triangular plates from RhCl3 in TREG (i–l). Aliquots were collected at (a, e, i) the temperature corresponding to the visible onset of particle nucleation, (b, f, j) after 15 min maintaining that temperature, (c, g, k) upon increasing the temperature 30–40 °C, and (d, h, l) after 75 min of focusing at that temperature (Adapted with permission from [58]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society).Combining microwave irradiation with polyol reduction can form a typical strategy for the synthesis of Rh NPs. Compared with conventional heating ways, microwave-assisted heating results in more uniform nucleation and shorter crystallization time, which is conducive to the formation of uniform metal colloids. Humphrey et al. conducted a comparative study to show the effects of microwave versus conventional heating on the nucleation and growth of near-monodispersed polymer-capped Rh NPs [59]. Extensive studies on formation of Rh NPs reveal fundamental differences during the nucleation phase that is directly dependent on the heating method; microwave irradiation was found to provide more uniform seeds for the subsequent growth of larger nanostructures of desired size and surface structure. Nanoparticle growth kinetics is also markedly different under microwave heating. While conventional heating generally yields particles with mixed morphologies, microwave synthesis consistently provides a majority of tetrahedral particles at intermediate sizes (5–7 nm) or larger cubes (≥8 nm) upon further growth. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) indicates that Rh seeds and larger nanoparticles obtained from microwave-assisted synthesis are more highly crystalline and faceted versus their conventionally prepared counterparts. Microwave-prepared Rh NPs also show approximately twice the catalytic activity of similar-sized conventionally prepared particles, as demonstrated in the vapor-phase hydrogenation of cyclohexene.
Synthesis of Rh NPs by seed-mediated growth
Seed growth method is a promising two-step process that separates thermally disfavored nucleation processes from subsequent spontaneous growth steps by adding monomers to existing nanoparticles [60, 61]. It has been employed for the growth of large metallic nanoparticles on seeds of the same metal and proved to be able to synthesize a variety of metal nanoparticles. In the presence of stabilizers, seed particles may be generated due to the rapid reduction of metal precursors at elevated temperatures or metal precursors after the reduction may deposit on the seed surface.Tilley et al. reported the radial anisotropic growth of Rh multipods that results from a homogeneous seeded growth mechanism [44]. Small Rh seeds were synthesized by reducing RhCl3 in ethylene glycol in the presence of PVP. Then the Rh seeds were used to form larger Rh NPs without isolation. Subsequently, they reported the size-tunable synthesis of Rh cuboctahedra and multipod nanoparticles with mean diameters ranging between 3 and 7 nm by seeded growth from isotropic PVP-capped Rh seed clusters of 2.9 nm under specific and controlled reaction conditions [45]. The particle formed via control of the monomer addition rate was demonstrated in Fig. 3, and the intrinsic solvent viscosity was demonstrated to be a highly influential factor on particle shape.
Fig. 3
Rh NPs prepared by addition of RhCl3 to Rh-PVP seeds in 1,2-propanediol at (a) 10 mg h−1, (b) 40 mg h−1, (c) 160 mg h−1, (d) jigsaw piece-shaped particles obtained for all monomer addition rates in 1,2-butanediol (Adapted with permission from [45]. Copyright 2007, American Chemical Society).
Rh NPs prepared by addition of RhCl3 to Rh-PVP seeds in 1,2-propanediol at (a) 10 mg h−1, (b) 40 mg h−1, (c) 160 mg h−1, (d) jigsaw piece-shaped particles obtained for all monomer addition rates in 1,2-butanediol (Adapted with permission from [45]. Copyright 2007, American Chemical Society).
Synthesis of Rh NPs by decomposing organometallic precursors
The organometallic derivatives, e.g. Rh(acac)3, are widely used as precursors for the synthesis of monodispersed Rh NPs [22, 62, 63]. One typical synthetic procedure using organometallic precursors for preparing Rh NPs is reported by Son and coworkers [46]. They successfully synthesized near-monodispersed Rh NPs with different morphologies by this approach and the key of the strategy was use of relatively unstable compounds 1–3 (Fig. 4) as precursors for the formation of nanoparticles at low temperature. In a typical synthesis, a suitable compound was added to well-dried oleylamine and the temperature rises gradually to a target temperature (170 °C for tetrahedral, 190 °C for spherical and 220 °C for irregular, respectively) with vigorous stir. Then this reaction temperature was maintained for 1 h. In the process, the mixed solution changes from red to black. After the reaction, methanol was poured to form black precipitates, which were purified to obtain Rh NPs (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4
Three different organometallic derivatives (compounds 1–3) used in the reaction for the synthesis of Rh NPs with different morphologies (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).
Fig. 5
Selected HRTEM images (a–c) of the particles in (d), (d) TEM image of the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh NPs formed at 190 °C from precursor 1, (e) TEM image of the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh NPs formed at 190 °C from precursor 2, (f) TEM image of rectangular rhodium nanoparticles formed at 220 °C by injection of precursor 3 into the hot solution (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).
Three different organometallic derivatives (compounds 1–3) used in the reaction for the synthesis of Rh NPs with different morphologies (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).Selected HRTEM images (a–c) of the particles in (d), (d) TEM image of the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh NPs formed at 190 °C from precursor 1, (e) TEM image of the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh NPs formed at 190 °C from precursor 2, (f) TEM image of rectangular rhodium nanoparticles formed at 220 °C by injection of precursor 3 into the hot solution (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).
Size control of Rh NPs
The size of NMNPs has a great influence on their catalytic performance [29, 64, 65]. In general, the most obvious dimension-related feature is that as the diameter decreases, the percentage of the surface atoms increases, and thus the catalytic performance is enhanced. However, the ratio of surface atoms is not the only factor determining the relationship between Rh particle size and catalytic performance. In fact, distinct surface activities are often observed for the particles with comparable sizes. The size effect of the nanoparticles can be attributed to several factors, such as changes in geometric structures, size dependent chemical properties and surface states [29].Liu et al. recently reported the size-tunable Rh nanostructures for wavelength-tunable ultraviolet plasmonics [66]. The uniform monodispersed Rh NPs with edge lengths of 15–59 nm have been successfully and controllably synthesized with the use of slow-injection polyol methods (Fig. 6). The size of Rh NPs is mainly determined by the ratio of Rh seeds to injected Rh precursors. In their study, they synthesized unprecedented large Rh nanocubes with slight concave faces. In order to prepare the large size Rh NPs, they controlled the concentration of the generated Rh atoms in the low saturation state, and added enough Rh precursors to minimize the formation of the seeds, so that the seeds would grow into larger seeds. And polydispersed size-controlled Rh NPs they synthesized show a good prospect for ultraviolet (UV) plasmonics with tuning surface plasmon resonances.
Fig. 6
TEM images of monodispersed Rh NPs in ethanol from slow-injection methods, with corresponding average edge lengths of 15 nm (a), 21 (b), 27 nm (c), 39 nm (d), 47 nm (e), and 59 nm (f), respectively (Adapted with permission from [66]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry).
TEM images of monodispersed Rh NPs in ethanol from slow-injection methods, with corresponding average edge lengths of 15 nm (a), 21 (b), 27 nm (c), 39 nm (d), 47 nm (e), and 59 nm (f), respectively (Adapted with permission from [66]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry).In addition to the influence of the precursors, polymer stabilizers can also control the size, shape, and/or composition of the Rh NPs [67, 68]. Somorjai et al. reported the preparation of small polymer-stabilized Rh NPs with a narrow size distribution [22]. The size dependence was studied by in situ ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS). Fig. 7 shows some characterization results of Rh NPs. TEM images of particles with different sizes and their size distribution histograms can be seen in Fig. 7a–e. Fig. 7f illustrates X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) data for the Rh 3d peak of the as-synthesized particles without pretreatment after Langmuir-Blodgett deposition onto a silicon wafer, and the ratio of oxidized Rh to reduced Rh clearly increases as the particle size decreases. They also employed a reactive oxide overlayer on Rh NPs with different sizes for CO oxidation to determine the effects of sizes on the catalytic performance.
Fig. 7
TEM images with insets of particle size distribution histograms of 100 particles for (a) 2 nm, (b) 2.5 nm, (c) 3.5 nm, (d) 7 nm, and (e) 11 nm Rh NPs, (f) Rh 3d XPS spectra of these Rh NPs (Adapted with permission from [22]. Copyright 2008, Wiley-VCH).
TEM images with insets of particle size distribution histograms of 100 particles for (a) 2 nm, (b) 2.5 nm, (c) 3.5 nm, (d) 7 nm, and (e) 11 nm Rh NPs, (f) Rh 3d XPS spectra of these Rh NPs (Adapted with permission from [22]. Copyright 2008, Wiley-VCH).Controlling the stabilizers during synthetic reaction process is another effective approach to tune the size of Rh NPs. Claver et al. reported the design and synthesis of 1,3-diphosphite ligands derived from carbohydrates and then used them as chiral nanoparticle stabilizers [69]. They were inspired by the studies demonstrating that these ligands were selected owing to their successful enantioselective discrimination in several catalytic processes [70]. The TEM images were shown in Fig. 8, which display small mean sizes and narrow size distributions. Furthermore, they applied the Rh NPs with distinct sizes as catalysts for the asymmetric hydrogenation of the prochiral monocyclic arenesm-methylanisole and o-methylanisole. These Rh NPs are shown to be active, and the systems yield high cis-selectivity.
Fig. 8
TEM images and size distribution histograms for different Rh nanoparticles (Adapted with permission from [69]. Copyright 2009, Wiley-VCH).
TEM images and size distribution histograms for different Rh nanoparticles (Adapted with permission from [69]. Copyright 2009, Wiley-VCH).In order to achieve better practical application, researchers have made great efforts to regulate the size of Rh NPs. From the participating perspective in the synthesis of Rh NPs, the effective regulation of nanoparticle size can be realized through tailoring the stabilizers, precursors, ligands and other aspects involved in the reaction.
Shape control of Rh NPs
To establish a correlation between the shape and catalytic performance of nanoparticles, a variety of different morphologies have been obtained for Rh NPs including cubes [43, 71, 72], decahedra [73], octahedral [21, 74], tetrahedral [46], sphere [75], multipods [15, 76, 77], and hexagonal polyhedral [25].
Synthetic approaches for spherical Rh NPs
NMNPs with spherical morphology are the most common products formed using solution-based methods. It is believed that spherical nanoparticles are thermodynamically stable, and therefore even harsher conditions could be used.Schaak et al. presented the first example of Rh nanostructures formed by self-aggregation of small Rh particles [75]. They established the synthesis of PVP-stabilized Rh NPs, which spontaneously aggregate into dense spherical nanostructures in solution, and they studied the influence of polymer-surfactant mixtures on the morphology. Though reducing aqueous RhCl3 solution with NaBH4 in the presence of PVP, the spherical aggregates are yielded within the size range of 10–100 nm, which are built from smaller 1–3 nm Rh particles and form without the need for seed-mediated or electrochemical growth. The dense nanostructures are thermally stable, and they have a tendency to form ordered superstructures upon drying, as shown in Fig. 9. This system supports spontaneous hierarchical organization over three length scales, which suggests that more complex nanostructures may be accessible by optimizing the synthesis and purification processes to achieve higher monodispersity. These well-defined nanoparticle aggregates could be important systems for studying the influence of catalytic activity and cooperative magnetic properties on interparticle separation and nanostructure, since aggregated structures have proven to exhibit enhanced properties relative to those of their discrete nanoparticles and bulk powders.
Fig. 9
TEM micrographs of spherical Rh nanoparticle aggregates synthesized using 920 mg of PVP (MW = 40 000) are shown in (a) and (b). Panel (c) shows a hexagonal superlattice, and panel (d) shows a superlattice formed after drying a suspension that was size-focused by centrifugation at 1 000 rpm. The arrows in (d) point to small spheres that sit in interstitial sites formed by larger spheres. A submonolayer of spherical aggregates deposited on a TEM grid and heated to 100 °C is shown in (e) and (f) (Adapted with permission from [75]. Copyright 2005, American Chemical Society).
TEM micrographs of spherical Rh nanoparticle aggregates synthesized using 920 mg of PVP (MW = 40 000) are shown in (a) and (b). Panel (c) shows a hexagonal superlattice, and panel (d) shows a superlattice formed after drying a suspension that was size-focused by centrifugation at 1 000 rpm. The arrows in (d) point to small spheres that sit in interstitial sites formed by larger spheres. A submonolayer of spherical aggregates deposited on a TEM grid and heated to 100 °C is shown in (e) and (f) (Adapted with permission from [75]. Copyright 2005, American Chemical Society).To compare the shape-dependent catalytic activity of different types of nanoparticles, Son et al. also prepared spherical Rh NPs by hot injection method [46], as shown in Fig. 10 for their TEM images. Specifically, a solution of precursor (0.050 g, 0.12 mmol or 0.24 mmol) in oleylamine (4 mL) was rapidly injected into 6 mL hot oleylamine at 250 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 250 °C, and then cooled down to room temperature and washed by methanol twice. The obtained precipitates were dried under vacuum for two hours and dispersed in 10 mL of hexane.
Fig. 10
Spherical Rh nanoparticles with average sizes of 4.8 ± 0.4 nm (a) and 7.1 ± 0.7 nm (b) prepared with the precursor concentration of 0.12 mmol and 0.24 mmol, respectively (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).
Spherical Rh nanoparticles with average sizes of 4.8 ± 0.4 nm (a) and 7.1 ± 0.7 nm (b) prepared with the precursor concentration of 0.12 mmol and 0.24 mmol, respectively (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).
Synthetic approaches for polyhedral Rh NPs
For Rh NPs, the form of polyhedron is very common in the process of morphology control, such as cube, octahedron, tetrahedron, hexagon, decanedron and tetrahexahedron.In 2008, Somorjai et al. reported the synthesis of monodispersed sub-10 nm Rh nanocubes with high selectivity by a seedless polyol method [43]. In this approach, chemically adsorbed Br− ions from tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (TTAB) could effectively stabilize the {100} faces of the Rh NPs and induce the evolution of nanocubes, as schematically shown in Fig. 11a. The TEM and HRTEM images in Fig. 11b reveal the formation of Rh nanocubes with high selectivity (>85%) and the Rh nanocubes are single crystalline.
Fig. 11
(a) Schematic illustration showing the seedless polyol synthesis of Rh nanocubes, (b) TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of as-obtained Rh nanocubes (Adapted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2008, American Chemical Society).
(a) Schematic illustration showing the seedless polyol synthesis of Rh nanocubes, (b) TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of as-obtained Rh nanocubes (Adapted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2008, American Chemical Society).Recently, Tanaka et al. studied the mechanism of formation of Rh nanocubes in the presence of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (TTAB)and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in ethylene glycol by using in situ X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) technique in conjunction with other ex situ techniques [71]. As schematically shown in Fig. 12, they summarized four distinct stages for the formation of Rh NPs, including (i) exchange of the ligand for Rh3+ between Cl− and Br−, (ii) Rh4 clusters act as the plausible nanoparticle nuclei, (iii) evolution of nuclei into Rh NPs, and (iv) transformation of irregularly shaped Rh NPs into cubic shape.
Fig. 12
Summary of the four-stage formation process of Rh NCs from RhCl3: the Rh species shown in the five boxes represent the predominant but not the exclusive Rh species present, and the chemical transformations illustrated under each arrow represent the major characteristic, but not necessarily the only process involved during each stage (Adapted with permission from [71]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society).
Summary of the four-stage formation process of Rh NCs from RhCl3: the Rh species shown in the five boxes represent the predominant but not the exclusive Rh species present, and the chemical transformations illustrated under each arrow represent the major characteristic, but not necessarily the only process involved during each stage (Adapted with permission from [71]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society).Schaak et al. demonstrated that proper selection of the polyol solvent can be used to manipulate the metal nanoparticle morphology [21]. Each polyol has a different oxidation potential which, along with the metal reagent, defines the temperature at which particle formation takes place. For a given system, particle growth will vary between a kinetic and thermodynamic regime depending on the thermal conditions, which can be modulated through selection of the appropriate solvent. Their strategy, which is demonstrated for the catalytically relevant Rh system, facilitates the high-yield synthesis of monodisperse Rh NPs with shapes that include icosahedra, cubes, triangular plates, and octahedra. Fig. 13 and Table 1 summarize the different results (size and shape) with diverse reaction conditions.
Fig. 13
Representative TEM images of Rh nanoparticles synthesized using ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and tetraethylene glycol solvents with the reagents (a–d) Rh2(TFA)4, (e–h) RhBr3, and (i–l) RhCl3 (TFA = trifluoroacetate). Outlined images indicate the set of reaction conditions which results in the most monodisperse yield of Rh icosahedra (red), cubes (green), and triangular plates (blue). Scale bars are 20 nm (Adapted with permission from [21]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society).
Table 1
Summary of reaction conditions and results (Adapted with permission from [21]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society).
Image number in Fig. 13
Precursor
Polyol solvent
Approx nucleation temp (°C)
Set focusing temp (°C)
Predominant (>25%) morphologies
a
Rh2(TFA)4
EGa
105–110
160
Icosahedron
b
Rh2(TFA)4
DEGb
120–130
170
Icosahedron
c
Rh2(TFA)4
TREGc
130–140
180
Icosahedron, 3-fold branched
d
Rh2(TFA)4
TEGd
135–145
185
Icosahedron, mixed anisotropic
e
RhBr3
EG
80–90
120
Truncated cube
f
RhBr3
DEG
105–110
140
Cube
g
RhBr3
TREG
110–120
145
Cube, bar
h
RhBr3
TEG
115–125
150
Concave cube, mixed concave, branched
i
RhBr3
EG
70–80
115
3-fold branched, triangular plate
j
RhBr3
DEG
85–95
130
Triangular plate, spherical polyhedron
k
RhBr3
TREG
95–105
140
Triangular plate
l
RhBr3
TEG
100–110
145
Triangular plate, octhedron
EG = ethylene glycol.
DEG = diethylene glycol.
TREG = triethylene glycol.
TEG = tetraethylene glycol.
Representative TEM images of Rh nanoparticles synthesized using ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and tetraethylene glycol solvents with the reagents (a–d) Rh2(TFA)4, (e–h) RhBr3, and (i–l) RhCl3 (TFA = trifluoroacetate). Outlined images indicate the set of reaction conditions which results in the most monodisperse yield of Rh icosahedra (red), cubes (green), and triangular plates (blue). Scale bars are 20 nm (Adapted with permission from [21]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society).Summary of reaction conditions and results (Adapted with permission from [21]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society).EG = ethylene glycol.DEG = diethylene glycol.TREG = triethylene glycol.TEG = tetraethylene glycol.Nogami et al. reported the preparation of PVP-protected Rh NPs using RhCl3 by a modified polyol method in ethylene glycol [74]. Through adjusting the concentration of AgNO3, the morphologies of Rh NPs are changed. At a low AgNO3 concentration, well-controlled cubic and octahedral Rh NPs with sizes of 7–14 nm could be easily obtained. The appearance of good control of morphology for Rh NPs is owing to their controlled growth of {100} and {111} selective surfaces, and the competitive growth between the two directions would lead to the formation of the morphology between cubic and octahedral shape (Fig. 14).
Fig. 14
(a–c) Rh NPs of various sizes and shapes, including cubic, octahedral, and porous Rh NPs (with the addition of 0.002 M AgNO3 synthesized by a polyol method in EG at 160 °C, the reduction time for RhCl3 of ∼20 min), (d–f) individual particles with different morphologies, (g, h) models of multiply twinned icosahedron and decahedron (Adapted with permission from [74]. Copyright 2011, Elsevier B. V.).
(a–c) Rh NPs of various sizes and shapes, including cubic, octahedral, and porous Rh NPs (with the addition of 0.002 M AgNO3 synthesized by a polyol method in EG at 160 °C, the reduction time for RhCl3 of ∼20 min), (d–f) individual particles with different morphologies, (g, h) models of multiply twinned icosahedron and decahedron (Adapted with permission from [74]. Copyright 2011, Elsevier B. V.).Son et al. found that Rh NPs with tetrahedral morphology show a 5.8- and 109-fold increase in activity for the hydrogenation of anthracene than spherical Rh NPs and commercial Rh/C catalyst, respectively [46]. The near-monodispersed tetrahedral Rh NPs preferentially exposing (111) planes were prepared by an organometallic approach, which used thermal decomposition of Rh complexes in oleylamine, followed by supporting on charcoal. These supported 4.9 ± 0.4 nm Rh nanotetrahedra and the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh NPs obtained by changing conditions were showed in Fig. 15.
Fig. 15
(a) Low-magnification TEM and HRTEM images (insets) of 4.9 ± 0.4 nm tetrahedral, (b) TEM images of the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh nanoparticles (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).
(a) Low-magnification TEM and HRTEM images (insets) of 4.9 ± 0.4 nm tetrahedral, (b) TEM images of the mixture of tetrahedral and spherical Rh nanoparticles (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).The Rh precursor in polyol method has a large influence on the shape and monodispersity of Rh NPs. Somorjai et al. synthesized monodispersed Rh NPs in the range of 5–15 nm by a seedless polyol reduction in ethylene glycol, with PVP as a capping ligand [25]. They could regulate the proportion of various morphologies by changing the Rh precursor. In Fig. 16, the TEM measurements show that the Rh polygons are dominated by 40% hexagons, 14% pentagons ((111)-twinned decahedra), 25% triangles, 8% squares, and 12% irregular particles (9.8 ± 1.6 nm), which were synthesized at temperature at 185 °C for 2 h, and using 2.5 mM [Rh(Ac)2]2 as Rh precursors.
Fig. 16
Low-magnification TEM images of as-obtained Rh NPs synthesized in 20 mL of ethylene glycol under an Ar atmosphere (2.5 mM [Rh(Ac)2]2, 100 mM PVP, 185 °C, 2 h, 9.8 ± 1.6 nm) (Adapted with permission from [25]. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society).
Low-magnification TEM images of as-obtained Rh NPs synthesized in 20 mL of ethylene glycol under an Ar atmosphere (2.5 mM [Rh(Ac)2]2, 100 mM PVP, 185 °C, 2 h, 9.8 ± 1.6 nm) (Adapted with permission from [25]. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society).Decahedral nanoparticles have received great attention owing to their unique symmetry and strain-energy distribution. However, it is more difficult to synthesize decahedral Rh NPs compared with other noble metals. Not long ago, Xia et al. [73] reported the facile synthesis of Rh decahedral NPs in high purity, with sub-20 nm sizes using a robust, one-pot method based on polyol reduction [73], as shown in Fig. 17 for the TEM and HRTEM images. They have further studied that the relationship between the yield of Rh decahedral NPs and reduction conditions, including the concentration of Rh(acac)3, the molecular weight and amount of PVP, and chain length of the polyol.
Fig. 17
(a) TEM image of Rh decahedra prepared using the standard procedure, (b) TEM images and schematic models of a decahedron in two different orientations (axial and side view), (c) HAADF-STEM image of the Rh decahedra, (d) High-resolution TEM image taken from an individual particle in sample (a) where the twin defects are marked with orange lines (Adapted with permission from [73]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH).
(a) TEM image of Rh decahedra prepared using the standard procedure, (b) TEM images and schematic models of a decahedron in two different orientations (axial and side view), (c) HAADF-STEM image of the Rh decahedra, (d) High-resolution TEM image taken from an individual particle in sample (a) where the twin defects are marked with orange lines (Adapted with permission from [73]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH).Through varying the denticity of the ligand coordinating to Rh in the precursors and varying the molecular weight of PVP, Xia et al. demonstrated a facile protocol for the synthesis of Rh icosahedra with average sizes up to 12.0 ± 0.8 nm by using Rh(acac)3 as a precursor and PVP as a reducing agent and a colloidal stabilizer in benzyl alcohol [41]. With this method, the reduction kinetics can be manipulated to promote the formation of twin defects in the Rh NPs (Fig. 18). When Rh(acac)3 is replaced by other precursors containing mono-dentate ligands, single-crystal Rh NPs are obtained due to the acceleration of reduction rate. By increasing the molecular weight of PVP from 10 000 to 1 300 000, the resulting Rh NPs are transformed from single-crystal octahedra to multiply twinned icosahedra and stacking-fault-lined plates. These results suggest that the successful preparation of Rh icosahedra could be facilitated by varying the binding strength of a ligand to Rh in the precursor and/or the molecular weight of PVP to optimize the reduction kinetics.
Fig. 18
(a,b) TEM images of Rh icosahedra with an average diameter of 12.0 ± 0.8 nm, which were synthesized by reducing Rh(acac)3 in benzyl alcohol containing PVP as a stabilizer and a reducing agent (In a, Rh plates and octahedra are indicated by P and O, respectively), (c) HRTEM images of an individual icosahedron, (d) atomic resolution TEM image taken from the edge marked by a box in c, revealing the twin boundary on the icosahedron (Adapted with permission from [41]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH).
(a,b) TEM images of Rh icosahedra with an average diameter of 12.0 ± 0.8 nm, which were synthesized by reducing Rh(acac)3 in benzyl alcohol containing PVP as a stabilizer and a reducing agent (In a, Rh plates and octahedra are indicated by P and O, respectively), (c) HRTEM images of an individual icosahedron, (d) atomic resolution TEM image taken from the edge marked by a box in c, revealing the twin boundary on the icosahedron (Adapted with permission from [41]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH).To overcome the extremely high specific surface free energy of Rh NPs, Sun et al. have developed an electrochemical square-wave-potential (SWP) approach to the generation of convex NMNPs with high-index facets, and they extended this method to the successful synthesis of tetrahexahedral (THH) Rh NPs enclosed by {830} high-index facets attributed to the dynamic oxygen adsorption/desorption process [47]. Fig. 19 shows the morphological and structural characterizations of the Rh THH nanocrystals obtained by SWP method. The average value of angle on the projection of the THHRh NC was measured in Fig. 19c, and it was quite close to the theoretical values on a THH NC enclosed by {830} facets, which are periodically composed of two {310} subfacets followed by a {210} subfacet, as illustrated in Fig. 19e.
Fig. 19
(a) Low- and (b) high-magnification SEM images of THH Rh NPs obtained at EU of 0.70 V and EL of −0.07 V, (c) TEM image and (d) SAED pattern of a THH Rh nanoparticle along the [001] direction, (e) atomic arranged model of {830} plane (Adapted with permission from [47]. Copyright 2014, Wiley-VCH).
(a) Low- and (b) high-magnification SEM images of THHRh NPs obtained at EU of 0.70 V and EL of −0.07 V, (c) TEM image and (d) SAED pattern of a THHRh nanoparticle along the [001] direction, (e) atomic arranged model of {830} plane (Adapted with permission from [47]. Copyright 2014, Wiley-VCH).
Synthetic approaches for Rh nanoplates or nanosheets
Due to their face-centered cubic (fcc) phase, the shape-controlled synthesis of Rh NPs has focused on the isotropic structure. However, anisotropic Rh NPs such as 2D nanoplates or nanosheets enclosed mainly by {111} facets have also been synthesized with the assistance of a capping agent. Schaak et al. found that Rh nanoplates could be prepared in the as-obtained particles by changing the experimental conditions [21]. As shown in Fig. 13i–l and Table 1, triangular Rh nanoplates have been made using RhCl3 in the polyol solvents (EG, DEG, TREG, TEG) at different temperature intervals. It is obviously that RhCl3 tend to produce branched particles in EG, but with larger polyols, the products are predominantly triangular plates.Son et al. reported the successful synthesis of unprecedented ultrathin Rh nanoplates through kinetically controlled growth at low temperature by using oleylamine as a coordinating and capping agent [78]. Fig. 20 shows the two view of plates varied from triangle to qudrangle (trapezoid, rhombus). The triangular nanoplates are observed as major shape and the prepared Rh nanoplates are ultrathin with an average thickness of only 1.3 ± 0.2 nm. They suggested a plausible mechanism formation for the growth of Rh nanoplates under the assistance of oleylamine on the basis of the chains via van der Waals interaction between alkyl groups to form lamellar structure (Fig. 20c).
Fig. 20
(a) TEM image and shape distribution diagram by investigating 750 plates, (b) TEM and HRTEM images of the cross-sectional view and their thickness distribution diagram of the obtained rhodium nanoplates, (c) suggested growth mechanism of Rh nanoplates (Adapted with permission from [78]. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society).
(a) TEM image and shape distribution diagram by investigating 750 plates, (b) TEM and HRTEM images of the cross-sectional view and their thickness distribution diagram of the obtained rhodium nanoplates, (c) suggested growth mechanism of Rh nanoplates (Adapted with permission from [78]. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society).In 2014, Li et al. reported the fabrication of PVP-supported Rh ultrathin nanosheets using a facile solvothermal method with a thickness of only one layer and the yield of 100 % [79], as shown by Fig. 21 for their microscopic characterizations. Various characteristic means have proved that the Rh nanosheets are composed of planar single-atom-layered sheets and the thickness of a Rh nanosheet is <4 Å. Furthermore, they carried out density functional theory (DFT) studies to illustrate that the single-layered Rh nanosheet involves a δ-bonding framework, which stabilizes the single-layered structure together with the PVP ligands.
Fig. 21
(a) Low-magnification TEM image of the PVP-capped Rh nanosheets, (b) High-magnification TEM image of the PVP-capped Rh nanosheet, (c) Aberration-corrected microscopy image of a PVP-capped Rh nanosheet (inset, the corresponding filtered image using the crystallographic average method to improve signal-to-noise ratio), (d) AFM image and the corresponding height profiles of a bare Rh nanosheet (Adapted with permission from [79]. Copyright 2014, Nature Publishing Group).
(a) Low-magnification TEM image of the PVP-capped Rh nanosheets, (b) High-magnification TEM image of the PVP-capped Rh nanosheet, (c) Aberration-corrected microscopy image of a PVP-capped Rh nanosheet (inset, the corresponding filtered image using the crystallographic average method to improve signal-to-noise ratio), (d) AFM image and the corresponding height profiles of a bare Rh nanosheet (Adapted with permission from [79]. Copyright 2014, Nature Publishing Group).
Synthetic approaches for branched or dendritic Rh NPs
In addition to the more commonly spherical and cubic morphologies, Rh NPs can also be made into branched or dendritic shapes. Wang et al. studied the shape-dependent electrochemical properties of Rh nanostructures prepared by tunable aqueous phase synthesis [76]. The highly selective one-pot synthetic method for Rh NPs they used have been achieved different morphologies such as horned particles, cubes, dendrites, and networks through the synergetic effect of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and halogen anions (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−). The dendritic structure of Rh NPs was first synthesized, and their morphology was shown in Fig. 22.
Fig. 22
Representative TEM and HRTEM (a, b, d) images of Rh nanodendrites synthesized at 220 °C for 6 h, the high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM image (c), and XRD profile of as-synthesized products (a, inset) (Adapted with permission from [76]. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society).
Representative TEM and HRTEM (a, b, d) images of Rh nanodendrites synthesized at 220 °C for 6 h, the high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM image (c), and XRD profile of as-synthesized products (a, inset) (Adapted with permission from [76]. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society).The zerovalent species, including atoms, clusters, and nanocrystallites, can all be oxidized back to their ionic form, and thus can alter the crystallinity, size, shape, morphology, and growth kinetics of products. To capitalize on that, oxidative etching is used for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles. For example, when coupling the O2 from air with a coordination ligand, especially a halide such as Cl−, Br−, or I−, they can serve as an effective etchant in a solution-phase synthesis [80]. The etching prefers to selectively start from the defect sites rather than a region with perfect crystallinity, thus the synthesis of Rh NPs in use of a salt precursor containing Cl− tends to form a single-crystal structure [42, 43, 44]. As a result, to obtain Rh twinned nanocrystals, any salt precursor that contains halide should not be used to completely eliminate the etching process. Xia et al. demonstrated a facile polyol approach to the synthesis of starfish-like Rh NPs with the use of a halide-free precursor [Rh(CF3COO)2]2 by replacing the conventional precursor containing Cl−
[77]. Successfully, they prepared the starfish-like Rh NPs with a five-fold twinned structure of high yield (Fig. 23). Under thermodynamically controlled conditions, the starfish-like Rh NPs are evolved from initial decahedral Rh particles; the process is driven by Ostwald ripening through producing arms from the five corners of the decahedral nanoparticles gradually.
Fig. 23
(a, b) TEM images, (c) HRTEM image, and (d) XRD pattern of a typical sample of starfish-like Rh NPs prepared using polyol reduction at 180 °C for 6 h (Adapted with permission from [77]. Copyright 2010, Wiley-VCH).
(a, b) TEM images, (c) HRTEM image, and (d) XRD pattern of a typical sample of starfish-like Rh NPs prepared using polyol reduction at 180 °C for 6 h (Adapted with permission from [77]. Copyright 2010, Wiley-VCH).Recently, Yang et al. reported the synthesis of dendritic Rh NPs with an overall size of 24.4 nm (Fig. 24a and b) by directly reducing Rh(acac)3 in oleylamine at elevated temperature [81]. In a typical synthesis, 0.5 mmol of Rh(acac)3 was added to 20 mL of oleylamine in a three-necked flask equipped with a condenser and a stir bar. The solution was brought to and kept at 160 °C for 2 h under flowing N2 for the reduction of Rh precursor by oleylamine. After reaction, the dendritic Rh NPs were purified by precipitation with methanol, centrifugation, washing with methanol, and re-dispersed in 20 mL of toluene. Oleylamine is a common reducing agent for the synthesis of NMNPs [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]. Through FI-IR and 1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) analyses, Liu et al. elucidated the mechanism for the NMNPs formed by oleylamine reduction [87]. In brief, amine ligands are firstly oxidized to amides during the reduction of metal precursors, and then form a protecting layer of hydrogen bond network on the surface of NMNPs. Therefore, the mechanism for producing Rh nanodendrites in oleylamine could be depicted by the scheme in Fig. 24c [81]. At initial stage, the Rh(acac)3 are reduced into Rh atoms by oleylamine, which grow into Rh particles, while oleylamides are simultaneously formed from oleylamine as the capping agent to stabilize the Rh particles. Then the particle aggregation would compete with the oleylamide passivation, resulting in the formation of a large number of Rh particle aggregates in the solution (step (i) in Fig. 24c). Finally, the Rh particle aggregates continuously grow with the expense of small particles in solution via a ripening process to form larger and more stable dendritic Rh NPs (step (ii) and (iii) in Fig. 24c).
Fig. 24
(a) TEM image and (b) HRTEM image of the dendritic Rh NPs synthesized in oleylamine at temperature of 160 °C; (c) Schematic illustration showing the mechanism for forming dendritic Rh NPs via the reduction of Rh(acac)3 in oleylamine at elevated temperature: (i) competition between particle aggregation and oleylamide passivation results in the formation of particle aggregates; (ii, iii) particle aggregates grow into nanodendrites via a ripening process (Adapted with permission from [81]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry).
(a) TEM image and (b) HRTEM image of the dendritic Rh NPs synthesized in oleylamine at temperature of 160 °C; (c) Schematic illustration showing the mechanism for forming dendritic Rh NPs via the reduction of Rh(acac)3 in oleylamine at elevated temperature: (i) competition between particle aggregation and oleylamide passivation results in the formation of particle aggregates; (ii, iii) particle aggregates grow into nanodendrites via a ripening process (Adapted with permission from [81]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry).
Synthetic approaches for Rh NPs with concave or frame structures
Maneuvering the shape to control their facets and curvature of NMNPs has been considered as a powerful means for tailoring their properties and enhancing their performance. In recent years, many studies have found that NMNPs under kinetically controlled conditions could break the thermodynamic confinement to form particles with concave surfaces [88, 89]. Take advantage of this strategy, Rh NPs with concave or frame structures can be specifically synthesized in the presence of a capping agent and at an appropriate reduction rate.Xia et al. demonstrated a simple and versatile polyol process for the synthesis of Rh concave nanocubes by manipulating the reaction kinetics [72]. By injecting the precursor at a slow rate of 4 mL h−1 into a growth solution using a syringe pump, Rh concave nanocubes of 15 nm in edge length with a cubic symmetry were deterministically obtained in a high yield approaching 100%. Fig. 25 shows the morphological and structural characterizations of Rh concave nanocubes, indicating the concave surfaces on the six side faces of each Rh nanoparticle and the surfaces are bounded by a mix of both {100} and {110} facets, where the presence of a high fraction of {110} facets on the surface is attractive for applications in catalysis. This strategy has also been extended to the syntheses of Rh-based bimetallic nanoparticles with concave surfaces.
Fig. 25
Morphological and structural characterizations of a typical sample of Rh concave nanocubes prepared at 140 °C with an injection rate of 4 mL h−1, (a, b) TEM images of the as-prepared sample, (c–e) HRTEM images of individual concave nanocubes recorded along the [100, 110,111] zone axes; the insets in a and b show a typical SEM image of the concave nanocubes and the 3D model, respectively (Adapted with permission from [72]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society).
Morphological and structural characterizations of a typical sample of Rh concave nanocubes prepared at 140 °C with an injection rate of 4 mL h−1, (a, b) TEM images of the as-prepared sample, (c–e) HRTEM images of individual concave nanocubes recorded along the [100, 110,111] zone axes; the insets in a and b show a typical SEM image of the concave nanocubes and the 3D model, respectively (Adapted with permission from [72]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society).In 2012, Xia et al. used this strategy to complete the synthesis of Pd-Rh bimetallic core–frame concave nanocubes and Rh cubic nanoframes by confined overgrowth of Rh atoms at the corners and edges of Pd cubic seeds [48]. Fig. 26 shows the morphology and a summary of all the major steps. The three steps involve (ⅰ) selective nucleation of Rh at the corners and edges of the Pd nanocubes, (ⅱ) the formation of Pd-Rh bimetallic concave nanocubes and their subsequent conversion into Rh cubic nanoframes, and (ⅲ) the formation of Rh cubic nanoframes by selectively etching away the Pd cores (Fig. 26e).
Fig. 26
(a) TEM images of Rh cubic nanoframes obtained by selectively etching away the Pd cores from the Pd-Rh core–frame nanocubes; (b, c) TEM images of Rh cubic nanoframes projected along <100> and <110> zone axes, respectively; (d) drawings that present a 3D model of the Rh cubic nanoframe and its projections along <100>, <110>, and <111> zone axes, (e) the three major steps involved in the synthesis of Pd-Rh core–frame nanocubes with concave faces and Rh cubic nanoframes (Adapted with permission from [48]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH).
(a) TEM images of Rh cubic nanoframes obtained by selectively etching away the Pd cores from the Pd-Rh core–frame nanocubes; (b, c) TEM images of Rh cubic nanoframes projected along <100> and <110> zone axes, respectively; (d) drawings that present a 3D model of the Rh cubic nanoframe and its projections along <100>, <110>, and <111> zone axes, (e) the three major steps involved in the synthesis of Pd-Rh core–frame nanocubes with concave faces and Rh cubic nanoframes (Adapted with permission from [48]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH).Further, Xia et al. reported a facile formation of Rh tetrahedrons with concave surfaces by interplaying reaction kinetics, facet-selective capping, and surface diffusion of atoms [90]. The uniform Rh concave tetrahedrons were demonstrated to be encased by a mix of {111} and {110} facets, and they could only be formed under a moderate reduction rate for the Rh3+ precursors to make sure of the coordination with a proper polyol. Rhtetrapods were generated by Rh atoms, which were spontaneously nucleated and subsequently selectively deposited onto the corner sites.Guo et al. reported a simple and effective site-selective etching strategy to control the concavity of Rh nanocubes enclosed by high-index facets by using hydrochloric acid as an etchant [91]. In Fig. 27, the thorough structural characterization of Rh concave nanocubes was carried out along three typical zone axes [100, 110,111] of face-centered cubic (fcc) nanocubes. Three different zone axes of the nanoparticles could explicitly identify the structure of the concave nanocubes. Though manipulating the degrees of concavity or Miller indices of high-index facets is significant for metal nanoparticles to further tailor their properties, generating a concave surface with negative curvature is still in the early development stage and tuning the degree of concavity remains a challenge.
Fig. 27
(a) Large-area STEM image of Rh concave nanocubes. (b, f, j) SAED patterns, (c, g, k) STEM images, (d, h, l) TEM images and (e, i, m) schematic geometric models of individual concave nanocubes oriented along the [100] (b–e), [110] (f–i), and [111] (j–m) zone axes (Adapted with permission from [91]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry).
(a) Large-area STEM image of Rh concave nanocubes. (b, f, j) SAED patterns, (c, g, k) STEM images, (d, h, l) TEM images and (e, i, m) schematic geometric models of individual concave nanocubes oriented along the [100] (b–e), [110] (f–i), and [111] (j–m) zone axes (Adapted with permission from [91]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry).
Synthetic approaches for Rh NPs with other morphologies
Apart from the shapes mentioned above, there are also a number of Rh NCs with other morphologies, e.g. wires, chains, and tubes.Lu et al. successfully synthesized hollow Rh nanotubes with uniform structures through the galvanic replacement reaction between Ag nanowires and aqueous RhCl3 in saturated NaI solutions at room temperature [92]. The approach was effective because I− anions could reduce the redox potential of Ag species and dissolve the formed AgI precipitates.Schaak et al. prepared magnetically separable hydrogenation nanowire catalysts decorated by Rh NPs [49]. Fig. 28 shows the TEM image of Rh nanowires templated by wild-type (WT) M13 bacteriophage, on which the Rh NPs are each ∼5 nm in diameter. The nanowires could only form under conditions where a cationic metal reagent is used. The formation of nanowires might be the result of cationic metal complexes adsorbing nonspecifically along the anionic surface and remaining stable even after reduction and nucleation of the nanoparticles.
Fig. 28
TEM images of WT phage coated with Rh nanoparticles using RhCl3 as the metal salt reagent and SAED pattern confirming the presence of fcc Rh (Adapted with permission from [49]. Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society).
TEM images of WT phage coated with Rh nanoparticles using RhCl3 as the metal salt reagent and SAED pattern confirming the presence of fcc Rh (Adapted with permission from [49]. Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society).For most catalytic reactions, the shape of the catalysts is closely related to the activity and selectivity. Different morphologies may have different catalytic performances in various reactions. From the perspective of preparation conditions, morphological control can be achieved in many ways, including those based on the use of surface capping agents, manipulation of reduction kinetics, control of surface diffusion rate, management of oxidation etching, and electrochemical alteration [42].
Applications of Rh NPs with different sizes/morphologies
Similar to other noble metals, Rh NPs have excellent catalytic properties for many catalytic reactions, including CO oxidation, hydrogenation, hydroformylation, and various electrochemical oxidation reactions [93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103]. However, the relationship between the catalytic properties of Rh NPs and their size/shape has only been studied in recent years. Herein, several typical examples will be exhibited to highlight the catalytic activity/selectivity enhanced by size- and shape-controlled synthesis for facilitating the use of Rh NPs in catalytic applications.
Catalytic applications of size-controlled Rh NPs
As depicted in previous sections, the size control of Rh NPs is significant for many catalytic reactions. Table 2 summarizes the size effect of Rh-based catalysts on the catalytic reactions that have been reported in literatures.
Table 2
Typical Examples showing the effect of Rh nanoparticle size on various catalytic reactions.
Size range (nm)
Stabilizer/support
Precursor
Reaction type
Ref.
2.3–7.8
MWNTsa
RhCl3
Hydrogenation
[104]
0.96–1.65
Quinine/Al2O3
Rh(acac)3
Hydrogenation
[63]
2–8
PVP/γ-Al2O3
RhCl3·xH2O
Sonogashira coupling
[105]
2–11
PVP
Rh(acac)3
CO oxidation
[22]
1.6–8
CeZrO2, ZrO2,SiO2
Rh(NO3)3·nH2O
CO oxidation
[106]
1–9
ZrO2, CeO2,SiO2, CeZrO2
Rh(NO3)3·nH2O
steam methane reforming
[107]
<1.5–6
SiO2
RhCl3, [Rh(COD)Cl]2
Hydroformylation
[108]
0.7–6
ZrO2
RhCl3·xH2O
Ethane hydrogenolysis
[109]
2–60.5–3.5
HEA16BF4HEA16HCO3
RhCl3RhCl3
Hydrogenation
[110]
5–10
[BMIm][PF6]
Rh(OAc)3, Rh(acac)3
Hydrogenation
[62]
1.6–4
−
Rh(η3-C3H5)3
Hydrogenation
[69]
MWNTs = multiwalled carbon nanotubes.
Typical Examples showing the effect of Rh nanoparticle size on various catalytic reactions.MWNTs = multiwalled carbon nanotubes.In recent years, there have been many studies on the size-regulated Rh NPs used to enhance catalytic performance of hydrogenation [62, 63, 104, 110, 111, 112]. Somorjai et al. synthesized size-tunable monodispersed Rh NPs in a range of 5–15 nm by a one-step polyol reduction and studied their unique properties for a heterogeneous catalytic reaction (hydrogenation) [113]. Using Rh(acac)3 as the metal precursors, they demonstrated the well-controlled polyol reduction kinetics for tuning the size of the Rh NPs by changing the Rh(acac)3 concentration in a proper range. Monolayer films were produced for the differently sized Rh NPs on silicon wafers by Langmuir-Blodgett method. Through catalytic tests, they revealed that the Rh particle monolayers as model heterogeneous catalysts are active for ethylene hydrogenation.A size-dependent effect was also observed for CO oxidation using supported Rh NPs [22, 106, 114]. Hensen et al. reported the preparation of Rh NPs on several oxide supports (CeZrO2, ZrO2,SiO2) by incipient wetness impregnation [106]. The particle size (dRh) of the reduced catalysts is within the range 1.6 nm–8 nm. In applications, Rh NPs stabilized by reducible supports with very small size are completely oxidized under CO oxidation conditions, whereas particles larger than 4 nm maintain their metallic state. This can represent that smaller Rh NPs are more catalytically active. Their study came up with the result that the supports could affect not only stability but also the oxidation behavior of the Rh NPs and therefore the catalytic activity. More remarkably, they found the Rh NPs supported on ceria exhibit size-dependent activity even after treatment at 450 °C, but the size-dependency disappears after calcination of PVP-stabilized Rh NPs.Hydroformylation is also often used as a reaction system to explore dimensional regulation [108, 115, 116, 117]. Goodman et al. studied the structure-activity behavior of the C2H4/CO/H2 reaction over Rh/SiO2 catalysts with different Rh particle sizes [34]. C2H4 hydroformylation reactivity data was shown in Fig. 29. The particle size effect is easily observed, and maximal propionaldehyde TOF occurs near an average Rh particle diameter of about 2.5 nm. Their work also summarized two factors relevant to particle size dependence for the reaction: (i) an increase in propionaldehyde formation on undercoordinated Rh sites and (ii) creation of carbonyl hydride species (Rh(CO)H)) on smaller Rh particles.
Fig. 29
Propionaldehyde TOF vs. average Rh particle size (nm). Reaction conditions: 50 Torr CO: 50 Torr C2H4: 400 Torr H2 at T = 500 K for 1 h. ±σy error bars represent error of repeated reactivity measurements, ±σx error bars represent the sigma of the Rh particle size distribution as determined from STM measurements (Adapted with permission from [34]. Copyright 2011, the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America).
Propionaldehyde TOF vs. average Rh particle size (nm). Reaction conditions: 50 Torr CO: 50 Torr C2H4: 400 Torr H2 at T = 500 K for 1 h. ±σy error bars represent error of repeated reactivity measurements, ±σx error bars represent the sigma of the Rh particle size distribution as determined from STM measurements (Adapted with permission from [34]. Copyright 2011, the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America).
Catalytic applications of shape-controlled Rh NPs
Most of the reactions catalyzed by Rh NPs are indeed structure-sensitive. Shape-controlled synthesis of Rh NPs has played an important role in enabling such studies by selectively exposing a specific type of facet on the surface, so that Rh NPs of different shapes can be used for different catalytic reactions [42].Son et al. reported the different performances of two morphological (tetrahedral and spherical) Rh NPs in hydrogenation reaction [46]. For the hydrogenation of anthracene, three main products are formed in the hydrogenation reaction, including those produced by hydrogenation of the central ring (B), the two side rings (D), or only one side ring (C). As shown in Table 3, Rh nanotetrahedra on charcoal show obviously better catalytic effect than that of spherical particles and commercial Rh/C, and with 5.8- (Table 3, entry 2 vs. entry 3) and 109-times (Table 3, entry 2 vs. entry 5) higher in activity for the hydrogenation of anthracene than spherical Rh NPs and commercial Rh/C catalyst, respectively.
Table 3
Comparison of catalytic activity and selectivity for Rh NPs supported on charcoal in the hydrogenation of anthracene (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).a
Entry
Catalyst
Pressure (atm)
Time (h)
Conv. (%)
Selectivity
B
C
D
1
Tetrahedral Rh/C
10
0.5
100
0.7
0.0
99.3
2
Tetrahedral Rh/C
1
2
100
2.0
0.0
98.0
3
Spherical Rh/C
1
2
99.5
6.7
76.3
17.0
4
Commercial Rh/C
10
0.5
57.3
6.4
81.0
12.6
5
Commercial Rh/C
1
2
4.8
35.4
45.8
18.8
Reaction conditions: 1.00 mmol of anthracene and 1 mol% of Rh/C (based on ICP analysis) in methanol at room temperature.
Comparison of catalytic activity and selectivity for Rh NPs supported on charcoal in the hydrogenation of anthracene (Adapted with permission from [46]. Copyright 2007, Wiley-VCH).aReaction conditions: 1.00 mmol of anthracene and 1 mol% of Rh/C (based on ICP analysis) in methanol at room temperature.Electrochemical measurements can also be used to investigate the dependence of catalytic activity on the shape of Rh NPs. Sun et al. successfully synthesized tetrahexahedral (THH) Rh NPs which exhibited greatly enhanced catalytic activity over commercial Rh black catalyst for the electrooxidation of ethanol and CO [47]. Fig. 30 illustrates different electrochemical performances for Rh NPs synthesized by the electrochemical square-wave-potential (SWP) route, as well as irregular nanoparticles and commercial Rh black catalyst. This is evident in Fig. 30a that THHRh NPs can promote the oxygen adsorption in the low potential region and larger electrochemically active surface area (ECSA). Fig. 30b shows a characteristic peak of CO oxidation on these catalysts. It can be clearly seen that the onset potential and peak potential of CO oxidation of THHRh NPs are the lowest, which could be further explained that the THHRh NPs with high-index facets are beneficial to CO oxidation. Fig. 30c about the linear sweep voltammograms (LSV) of ethanol oxidation demonstrates that the THHRh NPs yield the highest electrocatalytic activity of 2.69 mA cm−2, 6.9 times that of commercial Rh black catalyst. Long-term chronoampermetric (CA) measurements in Fig. 30d evaluate the catalytic activity of ethanol oxidation under continuous operating conditions. It turns out that the THHRh NPs has higher catalytic activity than commercial Rh black catalyst over the whole time range measured by CA. Sun et al. also demonstrated the chemical stability of THHRh NPs, further certifying their catalytic value.
Fig. 30
Electrochemical characterization of as-synthesized Rh NPs, irregular nanoparticles and commercial Rh black catalyst: (a) cyclic voltammograms (CVs) in 0.1 M H2SO4 solution, (b) linear sweep voltammograms (LSV) of CO oxidation in 0.1 M H2SO4 solution, (c) LSVs of ethanol oxidation in 1.0 M ethanol + 1.0 M NaOH solution (scan rate: 50 mV s−1), (d) current–time curves for ethanol oxidation at −0.45 V (Adapted with permission from [47]. Copyright 2014, Wiley-VCH).
Electrochemical characterization of as-synthesized Rh NPs, irregular nanoparticles and commercial Rh black catalyst: (a) cyclic voltammograms (CVs) in 0.1 M H2SO4 solution, (b) linear sweep voltammograms (LSV) of CO oxidation in 0.1 M H2SO4 solution, (c) LSVs of ethanol oxidation in 1.0 M ethanol + 1.0 M NaOH solution (scan rate: 50 mV s−1), (d) current–time curves for ethanol oxidation at −0.45 V (Adapted with permission from [47]. Copyright 2014, Wiley-VCH).
Conclusions
Rh NPs have great influence on the production life and scientific research nowadays. Mastering the shape and size of Rh NPs can control their properties and enhance their usefulness for a given reaction. In this study, we aim at highlighting the wet chemistry-based methods in synthesizing Rh NPs, including the synthetic approaches and the specific controls for shape and size. Based on the accurate classification of various aspects of Rh, the key synthetic steps and control methods are expatiated. The influence of different shapes and sizes on various catalytic reactions provides a design basis for further industrial applications.Even with these recent advancements in size- and shape-controlled Rh NPs, there are still many challenges in this important research field. Future research challenges in highly efficient Rh NPs may include: (i) to develop facile fabrication methods to precisely control the size and shape of Rh NPs and other NMNPs. Although the controlled preparation of Rh NPs has been studied a lot, its regulation and application are still restricted by the size and shape control compared with other platinum group metals such as Au, Ag, Pd, and Pt. Thus new synthetic approaches combined with existing control strategies for more Rh NPs with good control in sizes and shapes are sorely essential; (ii) to explore detailed characterization and mechanism. The further enhancement of theoretical simulation and in-situ characterization can reveal the mechanism behind synthesis and the interaction between compounds. This is conducive to guide the efficient synthesis of excellent metal nanomaterials; (iii) to reduce the amount of noble metals such as Rh. On the one hand, alternative catalysts can be found to replace noble metals; on the other hand, noble metals can be loaded on the substrates to improve their catalytic performance of unit precious metals.These discoveries and proposals for Rh NPs are also applicable to other noble metal nanoparticles, and the ultimate goal of these studies is to apply more efficient catalysts for practical applications.
Declarations
Author contribution statement
All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article.
Funding statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 21506225, 21573240 and 21706265), and Center for Mesoscience, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No.: COM2015A001 and MPCS-2017-A-02).
Competing interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
Authors: Nobuyuki Zettsu; Joseph M McLellan; Benjamin Wiley; Yadong Yin; Zhi-Yuan Li; Younan Xia Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2006-02-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Simon M Humphrey; Michael E Grass; Susan E Habas; Krisztian Niesz; Gabor A Somorjai; T Don Tilley Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2007-02-09 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Raffaele Cheula; Mariano D Susman; David H West; Sivadinarayana Chinta; Jeffrey D Rimer; Matteo Maestri Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 16.823