| Literature DB >> 30723724 |
Yu Ueda1, Taylor L Slabaugh1, Ashley L Walker1, Eric S Ontiveros1, Paul-Michael Sosa2, Rachel Reader2, Jeffrey A Roberts2, Joshua A Stern1,2.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is frequently associated with sudden cardiac death, presumably due to the development of malignant arrhythmias. The risk of sudden cardiac death due to HCM has been reported to be predicted by assessing electrocardiographic (ECG) changes including frequencies and complexities of arrhythmias as well as heart rate variability (HRV) as an assessment of autonomic balance. Sudden cardiac death in association with naturally-occurring left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been reported in a colony of rhesus macaques and is under investigation as a potential non-human primate model of human HCM. In the present study, 10 rhesus macaques with LVH and 10 without the signs of LVH confirmed by an echocardiographic examination were recruited for assessing ECG and HRV parameters. ECG morphology on 10-s, 6-lead ECG analysis, and the frequency and complexity of arrhythmias as well as HRV on 20-h ambulatory ECG Holter analyses were assessed. On the standard 10-s 6-lead ECG analysis, P wave and QRS complex duration as well as the QRS complex amplitude were significantly increased in the LVH-affected rhesus macaques compared to control rhesus macaques. Analysis of 20-h Holter monitoring revealed no statistically significant differences in the frequency or the complexity of arrhythmias between the LVH and the control groups. Several HRV parameters were smaller in the LVH group than the control group throughout the majority of Holter recordings showing periods of reduced variability, however, no statistically significant differences were achieved across groups and/or time points. These findings indicate that ECG analysis and Holter monitoring of rhesus macaques are feasible and that ECG morphological changes in association with LVH could be used as a possible component of an antemortem screening tool. The rhesus macaques of this study did not reveal clear indications of risk for sudden cardiac death. Further studies are necessary to determine the etiology of sudden cardiac death due in LVH affected rhesus macaques and identify if any parameters of arrhythmia assessment or HRV can be used to predict the development of sudden cardiac death.Entities:
Keywords: Holter analysis; arrhythmia; autonomic balance; electrocardiography; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; sudden death
Year: 2019 PMID: 30723724 PMCID: PMC6349711 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Right parasternal short axis imaging at the level of the papillary muscle in a normal rhesus macaque (A,B) and a rhesus macaque with severe left ventricular hypertrophy consistent with HCM (C,D). The images are presented as systole (A,C) and diastole (B,D).
Figure 2The standard 6-lead ECG waves obtained from the rhesus macaques with LVH (A) and without LVH (B). The lead II strips were obtained at the paper speed of 50 mm/s and vertical ECG calibration of 20 mm/mV.
Figure 3The left picture shows the left sided attachment of electrodes and ECG leads (left arm and left leg leads). The right picture shows the right sided attachment of electrodes and ECG leads (right arm, chest, and right leg leads).
Figure 4Twenty-hour Holter monitoring illustrating the frequencies and complexities of ventricular arrhythmia labeled as V (A) and supraventricular arrhythmia labeled as S (B) with normal QRS complexes labeled as N.
The rhythm analysis was completed and the HR, RR interval, and the amplitude/duration of P waves and QRS complexes, as well as the duration of PQ and QT intervals were obtained from the standard 10 s 6-lead ECG parameters.
| HR (bpm) | 143.5 (±19.93) | 134.8 (±19.83) | 0.34 |
| PR-interval (ms) | 98 (±14.76) | 96 (±12.65) | 0.75 |
| P amplitude (mV) | 0.175 (0.1–0.3) | 0.1 (0.1–0.15) | 0.1 |
| P duration (ms) | 44 (±10.75) | 33 (±9.49) | 0.026 |
| R amplitude (mV) | 1.25 (0.79–1.69) | 0.83 (0.74–0.93) | 0.12 |
| Absolute QRS amplitude (mV) | 1.5 (1.15–2) | 0.93 (0.8–1.1) | 0.0034 |
| QRS duration (ms) | 69 (±13.7) | 51 (±9.94) | 0.0035 |
| QT (ms) | 227 (20.58) | 226 (26.33) | 0.93 |
| QTc (ms) | 302.2 (±19.29) | 294.4 (±27.53) | 0.47 |
| MEA (degree) | 60 (45–75) | 60 (60–63.75) | 0.95 |
The ECG parameters were compared between the LVH and control groups. The values were listed as mean ± a standard deviation or median with an interquartile range. HR, heart rate; QTc, corrected QT interval; MEA, mean electrical axis; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
P < 0.05.
Frequencies and complexities of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias were obtained from the 20-h Holter monitoring and compared between the LVH and control groups.
| Total ventricular arrhythmia (beats per 20 h) | 0 (0–3.5) | 2 (0–14) | 0.33 |
| Class 1 | 0 (0–3.5) | 2 (0–11.25) | 0.25 |
| Class 2 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | |
| Class 3 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | |
| Class 4 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | |
| Total supraventricular arrhythmia (beats per 20 h) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–2.5) | 0.087 |
| Class 1 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–2) | 0.087 |
| Class 2 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | |
| Class 3 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | |
| Class 4 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) |
The values were listed as a median and an interquartile range. bpm, beat per minute; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
Figure 5The means and 95% confidence intervals of (A) minimal HR, (B) mean HR, (C) maximal HR for every 1 h over 20-h Holter analysis were noted with a red solid line for the LVH group and a blue solid line for the control group.
Figure 6The means and 95% confidence intervals of (A) pNN50, (B) SDNN, (C) RMSSD for every 1 h over 20-h Holter analysis were noted with a red solid line for the LVH group and a blue solid line for the control group.
HR, HRV parameters, and QTc-intervals were obtained from 20-h Holter study and compared between LVH and control groups.
| Minimal HR | 122.5 (±17.06) | 115.2 (±21.68) |
| Mean HR | 146.8 (±16.69) | 136.8 (±23) |
| Maximal HR | 193.1 (17.84) | 191.9 (17.27) |
| pNN50 | 2.05 (1.76–4.91) | 2.4 (0.13–8.84) |
| RMSSD | 21.88 (18.61–30.81) | 21.75 (14.83–34.33) |
| SDNN | 27.28 (21.5–38.76) | 35.03 (21.58–41.38) |
| SDANN | 28.43 (±11.25) | 29.76 (±12.86) |
| Triangular index | 8.6 (7.55–12.3) | 10.05 (6.288–11.99) |
| Minimal QTc | 358.2 (±23.79) | 366.8 (±366.8) |
| Mean QTc | 397.7 (±26.53) | 393.3 (±31.01) |
| Maximal QTc | 442.2 (±34.23) | 433.2 (±33.66) |
The values were listed as mean ± a standard deviation or median with an interquartile range. pNN50, the proportion obtained by dividing NN50 by the total number of NN intervals; RMSSD, the square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals; SDNN, the standard deviation of all NN intervals; SDANN, the standard deviation of the average NN intervals; QTc, corrected QT interval; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
Repeated measure analysis with linear mixed model were performed to determine the effects of the LVH status and time over 20 h to the heart rate, HRV parameters and the QTc-intervals.
| Minimal HR | 0.4 | < 0.0001 | 0.36 |
| Mean HR | 0.27 | < 0.0001 | 0.32 |
| Maximal HR | 0.88 | < 0.0001 | 0.0046 |
| pNN50 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.27 |
| RMSSD | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.41 |
| SDNN | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.27 |
| SDANN | 0.81 | 0.10 | 0.46 |
| Triangular index | 0.68 | < 0.0001 | 0.54 |
| Min QTc | 0.44 | 0.084 | 0.074 |
| Mean QTc | 0.75 | 0.019 | 0.71 |
| Max QTc | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.72 |
pNN50, the proportion obtained by dividing NN50 by the total number of NN intervals; RMSSD, the square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals; SDNN, the standard deviation of all NN intervals; SDANN, the standard deviation of the average NN intervals; QTc, corrected QT interval; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
P < 0.05.