| Literature DB >> 30723193 |
Jinqiang Zhang1, Bing Sun1, Yufei Zhao1,2, Anastasia Tkacheva1, Zhenjie Liu3, Kang Yan1, Xin Guo1, Andrew M McDonagh1, Devaraj Shanmukaraj4, Chengyin Wang5, Teofilo Rojo4, Michel Armand6, Zhangquan Peng7, Guoxiu Wang8.
Abstract
Due to the high theoretical specific energy, the lithium-Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30723193 PMCID: PMC6363722 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08422-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Illustration of IL-TEMPO facilitating the performance of Li–O2 batteries. a Schematic illustration of the IL-TEMPO facilitating the performance of Li–O2 batteries. b Cyclic voltammetry curve of battery with IL-TEMPO electrolyte in argon atmosphere. The scan rate is 0.5 mV s−1. The inset image is the illustration of n-/p-doping of IL-TEMPO. The lithium anode is pre-treated with IL-TEMPO-containing propylene carbonate (PC) electrolyte for 5 days before use. c The discharge–charge profiles of a Li–O2 battery with the 1% IL-TEMPO electrolyte and DEGDME electrolyte. d The enlarged discharge–charge curves of a Li–O2 battery with DEGDME electrolyte. The current densities were 0.1 mA cm−2
Fig. 2The promotion of Li2O2 formation with the aid of IL-TEMPO. a–e The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the carbon paper electrodes a before and b–e after the discharge process with b, c DEGDME electrolyte and d, e IL-TEMPO electrolyte. (c and e are the enlarged SEM images of b and d.) Scale bars are 2 µm in a, b, d, and 200 nm in c, e. f. The mechanism of the discharge facilitation using IL-TEMPO. Both routes involve the formation of intermediates with the oxygen species
Fig. 3Electrochemical performances with fixed capacities. a, b The discharge–charge profiles of a Li–O2 battery with a carbon paper electrodes and b carbon nanotube (CNT) electrodes. The current densities were 0.1 mA cm−2, and the cutoff voltage was 2.3 V/4.6 V. c–f In situ differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) analysis of the gas consumption and evolution during Li–O2 cell operation: c, e discharge to 0.25 mAh cm−2 at current density of 0.25 mA cm−2, and d, f charge to 0.25 mAh cm−2 at current density of 0.125 mA cm−2. The error of the DEMS data obtained during discharge is 5%, and during charge is 3%
Fig. 4Investigation of the stability of lithium metal anode in Li|Li symmetric cells. a The cycling performances and voltage profiles of lithium plating/stripping in the Li|Li symmetric cells. The current density was 1 mA cm−2. The insets are the illustration images of the lithium anodes. b–d scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the lithium metal after 50 cycles in b TEMPO electrolyte, c DEGDME electrolyte, and d IL-TEMPO electrolyte. Scale bars are 10 µm in b–d. e The schematic illustration of the SEI formation on lithium metal anode within the IL-TEMPO electrolyte
Fig. 5The electrochemical characterizations of IL-TEMPO (50%) when employed as electrolyte solvent. a The discharge–charge profiles and b the cycling performances of a Li–O2 battery with the 50% electrolyte. c The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the discharged electrode wn the mixed electrolyte was used. Scale bar is 400 nm. The inset figures are the SEM image at high magnification and schematic illustration of the discharge carbon nanotube (CNT) configuration comparing to the original CNT. Scale bars are 200 nm. d The discharge–charge profiles of a Li–air battery with the 50% electrolyte. The electrolyte was prepared by mixing IL-TEMPO and DEGDME with a 1:1 volumetric ratio, and the concentration of LiTFSI was kept at 0.5 M. The current density was 0.1 mA cm−2