| Literature DB >> 30723130 |
Christina Popp1, Bernardo Ramírez-Zavala1, Sonja Schwanfelder1, Ines Krüger1, Joachim Morschhäuser2.
Abstract
The clonal population structure of Candida albicans suggests that (para)sexual recombination does not play an important role in the lifestyle of this opportunistic fungal pathogen, an assumption that is strengthened by the fact that most C. albicans strains are heterozygous at the mating type locus (MTL) and therefore mating-incompetent. On the other hand, mating might occur within clonal populations and allow the combination of advantageous traits that were acquired by individual cells to adapt to adverse conditions. We have investigated if parasexual recombination may be involved in the evolution of highly drug-resistant strains exhibiting multiple resistance mechanisms against fluconazole, an antifungal drug that is commonly used to treat infections by C. albicans Growth of strains that were heterozygous for MTL and different fluconazole resistance mutations in the presence of the drug resulted in the emergence of derivatives that had become homozygous for the mutated allele and the mating type locus and exhibited increased drug resistance. When MTL a/a and MTLα/α cells of these strains were mixed in all possible combinations, we could isolate mating products containing the genetic material from both parents. The initial mating products did not exhibit higher drug resistance than their parental strains, but further propagation under selective pressure resulted in the loss of the wild-type alleles and increased fluconazole resistance. Therefore, fluconazole treatment not only selects for resistance mutations but also promotes genomic alterations that confer mating competence, which allows cells in an originally clonal population to exchange individually acquired resistance mechanisms and generate highly drug-resistant progeny.IMPORTANCE Sexual reproduction is an important mechanism in the evolution of species, since it allows the combination of advantageous traits of individual members in a population. The pathogenic yeast Candida albicans is a diploid organism that normally propagates in a clonal fashion, because heterozygosity at the mating type locus (MTL) inhibits mating between cells. Here we show that C. albicans cells that have acquired drug resistance mutations during treatment with the commonly used antifungal agent fluconazole rapidly develop further increased resistance by genome rearrangements that result in simultaneous loss of heterozygosity for the mutated allele and the mating type locus. This enables the drug-resistant cells of a population to switch to the mating-competent opaque morphology and mate with each other to combine different individually acquired resistance mechanisms. The tetraploid mating products reassort their merged genomes and, under selective pressure by the drug, generate highly resistant progeny that have retained the advantageous mutated alleles. Parasexual propagation, promoted by stress-induced genome rearrangements that result in the acquisition of mating competence in cells with adaptive mutations, may therefore be an important mechanism in the evolution of C. albicans populations.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicanszzm321990; drug resistance evolution; mating; parasexual recombination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30723130 PMCID: PMC6428756 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02740-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1Schematic showing the location of mutated TAC1, ERG11, MRR1, and UPC2 alleles on the respective chromosomes in the genetically engineered C. albicans strains used in this study. Genes (arrows) and chromosomes (gray lines) are not drawn to scale; only the relative positions of the genes, MTLa and MTLα loci (blue and green rectangles, respectively), and centromeres (black ovals) are indicated. Alleles carrying fluconazole resistance mutations (marked by stars) are represented by red arrows, and the corresponding wild-type alleles on the homologous chromosomes by white arrows. The polymorphic GLN3 and CAP1 alleles on the right arm of Chr5 and on the left arm of Chr3, respectively, which were used to analyze LOH events, are also shown and distinguished by color. Note that the parental strain SC5314 is almost completely homozygous for the right arm of Chr3; the putative location of the mutated MRR1 allele on Chr3A in strain SCMRR1R32B was deduced from its linkage to the CAP1-2 allele after an LOH event in homozygous derivatives; for strain SCMRR1R32A no such derivative was obtained, and the location of the mutated MRR1 on Chr3A or Chr3B in this strain has not been established.
Genetically engineered C. albicans strains used in this study
| Strain | Parent | Relevant genotype | Fluconazole | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC5314 | Wild-type reference strain | 0.5 | ||
| SCERG11R32A | SC5314 | 2 | ||
| SCERG11R32B | SC5314 | 2l | ||
| SCERG11R34A | SCERG11R32A | 4 | ||
| SCERG11R34B | SCERG11R32B | 4 | ||
| SCMRR1R32A | SC5314 | 4 | ||
| SCMRR1R32B | SC5314 | 4 | ||
| SCMRR1R34A | SCMRR1R32A | 16 | ||
| SCMRR1R34B | SCMRR1R32B | 16 | ||
| SCTAC1R32A | SC5314 | 2 | ||
| SCTAC1R32B | SC5314 | 2 | ||
| SCTAC1R34A | SCTAC1R32A | 8 | ||
| SCTAC1R34B | SCTAC1R32B | 8 | ||
| SCUPC2R12A | SC5314 | 2 | ||
| SCUPC2R12B | SC5314 | 2 | ||
| SCUPC2R14A | SCUPC2R12A | 4 | ||
| SCUPC2R14B | SCUPC2R12B | 4 | ||
| SCETR34A | SCERG11R34A | 16 | ||
| SCETR34B | SCERG11R34B | 16 | ||
| SCEUR14A | SCERG11R34A | 16 | ||
| SCEUR14A | SCERG11R34B | 16 | ||
| SCMER34A | SCMRR1R34A | 64 | ||
| SCMER34B | SCMRR1R34B | 64 | ||
| SCMTR34A | SCMRR1R34A | 32 | ||
| SCMTR34B | SCMRR1R34B | 32 | ||
| SCMUR14A | SCMRR1R34A | 64 | ||
| SCMUR14B | SCMRR1R34B | 64 | ||
| SCUTR34A | SCUPC2R14A | 64 | ||
| SCUTR34B | SCUPC2R14B | 64 | ||
| SCEThet1A | SCERG11R32A | 4 | This study | |
| SCEThet1B | SCERG11R32B | 4 | This study | |
| SCMEhet1A | SCMRR1R32A | 8 | This study | |
| SCMEhet1B | SCMRR1R32B | 8 | This study | |
| SCMThet1A | SCMRR1R32A | 8 | This study | |
| SCMThet1B | SCMRR1R32B | 8 | This study | |
| SCMUhet1A | SCMRR1R32A | 8 | This study | |
| SCMUhet1B | SCMRR1R32B | 8 | This study | |
| SCUEhet1A | SCUPC2R12A | 4 | This study | |
| SCUEhet1B | SCUPC2R12B | 4 | This study | |
| SCUThet1A | SCUPC2R12A | 8 | This study | |
| SCUThet1B | SCUPC2R12B | 8 | This study | |
| SCMTLαM2A | SC5314 | 0.5 | ||
| SCMTL | SC5314 | 0.5 |
The two alleles of ERG11, TAC1, and UPC2 in strain SC5314 were distinguished by HindIII, SpeI, and EcoRI restriction site polymorphisms, respectively. The ERG11 allele with the HindIII site at position +347 (on Chr5B) was arbitrarily designated ERG11-2 (42), the TAC1 allele with the downstream SpeI site at position +4411 (on Chr5B) was designated TAC1-2 (60), and the UPC2 allele with the EcoRI site at position +1593 (on Chr1A) was designated UPC2-2 (31).
Fluconazole-induced MTL-homozygous strains used in mating experiments
| Strain | Parent | Relevant genotype | Fluconazole |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCERG11R32hom1A | SCERG11R32A | 8 | |
| SCERG11R32hom1B | SCERG11R32B | 8 | |
| SCMRR1R32hom1A | SCMRR1R32A | 16 | |
| SCMRR1R32hom2A | SCMRR1R32A | 16 | |
| SCTAC1R32hom2A | SCTAC1R32A | 8 | |
| SCTAC1R32hom2B | SCTAC1R32B | 8 | |
| SCUPC2R12hom1A | SCUPC2R12A | 2 | |
| SCUPC2R12hom1B | SCUPC2R12B | 2 |
The two GLN3 alleles on the right arm of Chr5 in strain SC5314 were distinguished by a ClaI restriction site polymorphism; the GLN3 allele with the upstream ClaI site at position −1712 (on Chr5B) was designated GLN3-1 (67). The two CAP1 alleles on the left arm of Chr3 in strain SC5314 were distinguished by an EcoRI restriction site polymorphism; the CAP1 allele with the EcoRI site at position +1212 (on Chr3A) was designated CAP1-2 (62).
FIG 2Genetic analysis of fluconazole-induced MTL-homozygous strains. Shown are the genetically engineered strains that are heterozygous for mutated TAC1* (SCTAC1R32A and -B), ERG11* (SCERG11R32A and -B), MRR1* (SCMRR1R32A), and UPC2* (SCUPC2R12A and -B) alleles and derivatives that became homozygous for MTLa or MTLα after growth in the presence of fluconazole. The parental wild-type reference strain SC5314 is included for comparison. A schematic showing the restriction site polymorphisms used to distinguish wild-type and mutated ERG11, MRR1, TAC1, and UPC2 alleles, the polymorphic wild-type GLN3 and CAP1 alleles, and the MTLa and MTLα loci, as well as the expected fragment sizes after hybridization with specific probes is presented in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material. Some blots are from independent genomic DNA preparations of the same strains, and differences in signal intensities are caused by unequal loading. The MIC (μg/ml) of fluconazole for each strain is given below the corresponding lane.
FIG 3Genetic analysis of mating products by Southern hybridization with relevant probes. All mating products and their parental strains are listed in Table 3. The MTL configuration (a/a or α/α) and fluconazole resistance alleles (*) of the parental strains are indicated. See Fig. S2 for a schematic of the loci. The names of the mating products indicate the resistance alleles (E for ERG11*, M for MRR1*, T for TAC1*, U for UPC2*) and which of them came from the a/a parent (first letter) and which from the α/α parent (second letter). Some blots are from independent genomic DNA preparations of the same strains, and differences in signal intensities are caused by unequal loading. The MIC (μg/ml) of fluconazole for each strain is given below the corresponding lane.
Mating products used for passaging experiments
| Mating | Fluconazole | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EM1 | SCERG11R32hom1B | SCMRR1R32hom1A | 8 |
| ME1 | SCMRR1R32hom2A | SCERG11R32hom1A | 4 |
| ET1 | SCERG11R32hom1B | SCTAC1R32hom2A | 8 |
| TE1 | SCTAC1R32hom2B | SCERG11R32hom1A | 4 |
| EU1 | SCERG11R32hom1B | SCUPC2R12hom1B | 4 |
| UE1 | SCUPC2R12hom1A | SCERG11R32hom1A | 2 |
| MT1 | SCMRR1R32hom2A | SCTAC1R32hom2A | 8 |
| TM1 | SCTAC1R32hom2B | SCMRR1R32hom1A | 4 |
| MU1 | SCMRR1R32hom2A | SCUPC2R12hom1B | 4 |
| UM1 | SCUPC2R12hom1A | SCMRR1R32hom1A | 4 |
| TU1 | SCTAC1R32hom2B | SCUPC2R12hom1B | 4 |
| UT1 | SCUPC2R12hom1A | SCTAC1R32hom2A | 8 |
FIG 4Ploidy analysis of mating products and their parental strains. The plots show the results of flow cytometric measurements of the DNA content of the fluconazole-induced MTL-homozygous strains (A) and the mating products obtained in the various crossings (B). The profile of the diploid reference strain SC5314 is shown in blue, and the profiles of all other strains are shown in red.
FIG 5Genetic analysis of mating product progeny by Southern hybridization with relevant probes. Shown are original mating products (first lanes) and derivatives exhibiting increased fluconazole resistance after passage in the presence of the drug. Progeny of mating products of the reverse crossings are presented in Fig. S5. Some blots are from independent genomic DNA preparations of the same strains, and differences in signal intensities are caused by unequal loading. The MIC (μg/ml) of fluconazole for each strain is given below the corresponding lane. The observed genetic changes are summarized in Table 4.
Genomic changes in mating products after passage in fluconazole
| Mating | Fluconazole | Genomic change(s) in |
|---|---|---|
| EM1 | 8 | |
| EM1P3A-1 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| EM1P8A-1 | 128 | Loss of wild-type |
| EM1P8A-3 | 128 | Loss of wild-type |
| ME1 | 4 | |
| ME1P4A-2 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| ME1P4A-3 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| ME1P5A-2 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| ET1 | 8 | |
| ET1P2A-2 | 16 | |
| ET1P7A-3 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| TE1 | 4 | |
| TE1P6A-1 | 16 | Decrease in wild-type |
| TE1P6A-2 | 16 | Loss of wild-type |
| TE1P12A-1 | 128 | Loss of wild-type |
| EU1 | 4 | |
| EU1P6A-3 | 32 | Decrease in wild-type |
| EU1P8A-3 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| UE1 | 2 | |
| UE1P2A-1 | 4 | Increase in |
| UE1P4A-3 | 16 | Increase in |
| MT1 | 8 | |
| MT1P3A-3 | 16 | Decrease in wild-type |
| MT1P5A-2 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| MT1P5A-3 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| TM1 | 4 | |
| TM1P6A-2 | 16 | Loss of wild-type |
| TM1P6A-3 | 16 | Loss of wild-type |
| TM1P10A-1 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| MU1 | 4 | |
| MU1P5A-1 | 32 | Decrease in wild-type |
| MU1P7A-1 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| UM1 | 4 | |
| UM1P3A-3 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| UM1P3A-1 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| TU1 | 4 | |
| TU1P6A-3 | 16 | |
| TU1P11A-1 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| TU1P11A-3 | 64 | Loss of wild-type |
| UT1 | 8 | |
| UT1P2A-2 | 16 | Decrease in wild-type |
| UT1P2A-3 | 16 | Decrease in wild-type |
| UT1P5A-1 | 32 | Loss of wild-type |
| UT1P5A-2 | 32 | Decrease in wild-type |
Decreases and increases in copy number are relative to the other allele.
FIG 6Ploidy analysis of mating product progeny. The plots show the results of flow cytometric measurements of the DNA content of the original mating products and derivatives with increased fluconazole resistance after passage in the presence of the drug. The profile of the diploid reference strain SC5314 is shown in blue in each experiment.