Literature DB >> 30723121

Suboptimal osteoporosis evaluation and treatment in older men with and without additional high-risk factors for fractures.

Radhika Rao Narla1,2, Lianne A Hirano3,4, Serena H Y Lo3, Bradley D Anawalt5, Elizabeth A Phelan3,6, Alvin M Matsumoto3,4.   

Abstract

We compared osteoporosis case-finding, evaluation and treatment in groups of Older Men and Older Women with age alone as a significant risk for fracture and Older Men with Higher Risk (older men additionally having previous hip fracture, corticosteroid use or androgen deprivation therapy). We studied 13,704 older men and women (≥70 years old) receiving care at a Veterans Affairs medical center from January 2000 to August 2010 whose 10-year hip fracture risk was assessed by limited FRAX score. The main outcome measures were the proportion of patients who had bone mineral density (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH D) measurements performed, and calcium/vitamin D or bisphosphonates prescribed. The proportion of men with a 10-year hip fracture risk ≥3% with age alone as a risk was 48% and 88% in men aged 75-79 and ≥80 years, respectively. Compared with Older Women, fewer Older Men underwent DXA (12% vs 63%, respectively) and 25-OH D measurements (18% vs 39%), and fewer received calcium/vitamin D (20% vs 63%) and bisphosphonate (5% vs 44%) prescriptions. In Older Men with Higher Risk category, the proportion of men with 10-year hip fracture risk ≥3% ranged from 69% to 95%. Despite a higher risk and expectation that this group would have greater case detection and screening, few Older Men with Higher risk underwent DXA screening (27%-36%) and 25-OH D measurements (23%-28%), and received fewer calcium/vitamin D (40%-50%) and bisphosphonate (13%-24%) prescriptions. Considering the known morbidity and mortality, our findings underscore the need for improved evaluation and management of osteoporosis in older men at high risk for fracture. © American Federation for Medical Research 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRAX; bone densitometry; delivery of health care; fracture risk; osteoporosis; quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30723121     DOI: 10.1136/jim-2018-000907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of osteoporosis in older men.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Kaufman
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Cultivating across "pockets of excellence": challenges to sustaining efforts to improve osteoporosis care.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Melissa J A Steffen; Jennifer M Van Tiem; Shylo Wardyn; Xiomara Santana; Karla L Miller; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone health in ageing men.

Authors:  Karel David; Nick Narinx; Leen Antonio; Pieter Evenepoel; Frank Claessens; Brigitte Decallonne; Dirk Vanderschueren
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Factors associated with referral for osteoporosis care in men: a real-life study of a nationwide dataset.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Davide Gatti; Maurizio Rossini; Alessandro Giollo; Eugenia Bertoldo; Ombretta Viapiana; Pietro Olivi; Angelo Fassio
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Incidence, morbidity and mortality of hip fractures over a period of 20 years in a health area of Southern Spain.

Authors:  Marta M Rey-Rodriguez; M A Vazquez-Gamez; Mercè Giner; Fernando Garrachón-Vallo; Luis Fernández-López; Miguel Angel Colmenero; María-José Montoya-García
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.