Literature DB >> 30723021

Understanding the underutilization of cervical brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Ting Martin Ma1, Matthew M Harkenrider2, Catheryn M Yashar3, Akila N Viswanathan1, Jyoti S Mayadev4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand the reasons behind current low utilization of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 17-item survey was e-mailed to the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) listserv of active members in 2018. Responses of attending physicians in the United States were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: Among a total of 135 respondents, 81 completed the survey. Eighty-four percent agree/strongly agree that cervical brachytherapy is underutilized, and 46.9% disagree/strongly disagree that residents are receiving adequate training for brachytherapy; 75.3% agree/strongly agree that inadequate maintenance of brachytherapy skills is a major obstacle to brachytherapy use; and 71.6% agree/strongly agree that increased time requirement constitutes a major obstacle. Over 97% will recommend brachytherapy for most patients with cervical cancer if given access/time; 72.8% always perform their own brachytherapy, whereas 29.6% reported some type of barrier exists in performing brachytherapy themselves, with time required to perform brachytherapy (9.9%) being a leading factor. A quarter (24.7%) routinely refer to other radiation oncologists for brachytherapy. Even among ABS members, 37.0% reported that they would perform an intensity-modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic body radiation therapy boost in specific scenarios in potentially curable patients. The most common scenario is inability to place a uterine tandem (56.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: The underutilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer is widely recognized by ABS members with inadequate training during residency and inadequate maintenance of skills being possible major contributing factors. Even among ABS members, there are identifiable barriers. Continued advocacy and future initiatives in enhancing access to brachytherapy training and efficiency are needed. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American brachytherapy society (ABS); Brachytherapy; Cervical cancer; Survey; Underutilization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30723021     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  5 in total

1.  Socioeconomic and Racial Determinants of Brachytherapy Utilization for Cervical Cancer: Concerns for Widening Disparities.

Authors:  David Boyce-Fappiano; Kevin A Nguyen; Olsi Gjyshi; Gohar Manzar; Chike O Abana; Ann H Klopp; Mitchell Kamrava; Peter F Orio; Nikhil G Thaker; Firas Mourtada; Puja Venkat; Albert J Chang
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 2.  Practical brachytherapy solutions to an age-old quandary.

Authors:  N Thiruthaneeswaran; H Tharmalingam; P J Hoskin
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Brachytherapy utilization for cervical cancer in Western United States border counties: seeking to understand referral patterns for outcome improvement.

Authors:  Christine H Feng; Corinne McDaniels-Davidson; Maria Elena Martinez; Jesse Nodora; Arno J Mundt; Jyoti S Mayadev
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-12-30

Review 4.  Global challenges of radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jyoti S Mayadev; Guihao Ke; Umesh Mahantshetty; Marcos David Pereira; Rafal Tarnawski; Takafumi Toita
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Survival, treatment pattern, and treatment outcome in patients with cervical cancer metastatic to distant lymph nodes.

Authors:  Haoliang Lin; Dongyan Wang; Hui Li; Chuling Wu; Fengqian Zhang; Zhongqiu Lin; Tingting Yao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.