Literature DB >> 30721434

Drivers of carbon emissions in Turkey: considering asymmetric impacts.

Alper Karasoy1.   

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of income, (renewable and non-renewable) energy consumption, trade, and financial development on carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey for the 1965-2015 period by employing the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag method. Results show that non-renewable and renewable energy consumption, and trade openness have asymmetric impacts on pollution in long-run, while only renewable energy consumption has asymmetric impact on emissions in short-run. Results further reveal that the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis is not valid in Turkey. Moreover, both financial development and trade positively affect emissions. Additionally, in long-run, positive shocks in renewable and non-renewable energy consumption increase emissions, but the impact of renewable energy consumption is infinitesimally small compared to the impact of non-renewable energy consumption. However, negative shocks in renewable energy consumption increase emissions, whereas negative developments in non-renewable energy consumption decrease emissions. Further, in short-run, positive developments in renewable energy consumption decrease emissions, and negative developments in non-renewable energy consumption have the same influence on emissions. In accordance with the findings, some policy suggestions are proposed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 emissions; Financial development; Non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL); Renewable energy; The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis; Trade; Turkey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30721434     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04354-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  6 in total

1.  Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasoulinezhad; Behnaz Saboori
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Turkey.

Authors:  Umit Bulut
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in CO2 emissions: a disaggregate analysis of Pakistan.

Authors:  Syed Anees Haider Zaidi; Fujun Hou; Faisal Mehmood Mirza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  A review on Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Determinants of CO2 emissions in the MERCOSUR: the role of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy.

Authors:  Emerson Santana de Souza; Fátima de Souza Freire; Josimar Pires
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries.

Authors:  Mehmet Mert; Gülden Bölük
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Do technological innovations and financial development improve environmental quality in Egypt?

Authors:  Dalia M Ibrahiem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.