Literature DB >> 30720368

Pheromone-Induced Accuracy of Nestmate Recognition in Carpenter Ants: Simultaneous Decrease in Type I and Type II Errors.

Natacha Rossi, David Baracchi, Martin Giurfa, Patrizia d'Ettorre.   

Abstract

The ecological and evolutionary success of social insects relies on their ability to efficiently discriminate between group members and aliens. Nestmate recognition occurs by phenotype matching, the comparison of the referent (colony) phenotype to the one of an encountered individual. Based on the level of dissimilarity between the two, the discriminator accepts or rejects the target. The tolerated degree of mismatch is predicted by the acceptance threshold model, which assumes adaptive threshold shifts depending on the costs of discrimination errors. Inherent in the model is that rejection (type I) and acceptance (type II) errors are reciprocally related: if one type decreases, the other increases. We studied whether alarm pheromones modulate the acceptance threshold. We exposed Camponotus aethiops ants to formic acid and subsequently measured aggression toward nestmates and nonnestmates. Formic acid induced both more nonnestmate rejection and more nestmate acceptance than a control treatment, thus uncovering an unexpected effect of an alarm pheromone on responses to nestmates. Nestmate discrimination accuracy was improved via a decrease in both types of errors, a result that cannot be explained by a shift in the acceptance threshold. We propose that formic acid increases the amount of information available to the ants, thus decreasing the perceived phenotypic overlap between nestmate and nonnestmate recognition cues. This mechanism for improved discrimination reveals a novel function of alarm pheromones in recognition processes and may have far-reaching implications in our understanding of the modus operandi of recognition systems in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acceptance threshold model; aggressive behaviors; chemical communication; formic acid; social insects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30720368     DOI: 10.1086/701123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  3 in total

1.  Signal detection: applying analysis methods from psychology to animal behaviour.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Seirian Sumner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolutionarily stable investments in recognition systems explain patterns of discrimination failure and success.

Authors:  Michael J Sheehan; H Kern Reeve
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Olfactory Strategies in the Defensive Behaviour of Insects.

Authors:  Kavitha Kannan; C Giovanni Galizia; Morgane Nouvian
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.