| Literature DB >> 30719062 |
Qingjie Yuan1, Yang Li2, Xiaofei Deng3, Huawei Shi2, Zhenwu Zhao2, Chunye Wang4, Xuegong Feng1, Jianyou Guo3, Rongjuan Guo4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the effectiveness and mechanism of the Chinese herbal formula Xingpi Kaiyu Fang (XPKYF) which is composed of American ginseng (Xi-Yang-shen), Radix curcumae (Yu-Jin), Acori tatarinowii rhizoma (Shi-Chang-pu), and Hypericum perforatum (Guan-Ye-lian-qiao) in depressed rats.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30719062 PMCID: PMC6335795 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6054926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Total ion chromatography. (a) Total positive ions chromatography. (b) Total negative ions chromatography. (c) Results of ions identification.
Schedule of stressors used in 42 days of CUMS procedure.
| Stressor | Day | Stressor | Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rat screech (6h) & high frequency flash (16h) | 1 | Rat screech (6h) & high frequency flash (16h) | 22 |
| Water deprivation & mixed breeding (22h) | 2 | Light irradiation & water deprivation (16h) | 23 |
| Cold water swimming (5min) | 3 | Fasting & mixed breeding | 24 |
| Restraint(0.5h) & rat tail with forceps clip (5min) | 4 | Restraint (0.5h) & rat tail with forceps clip (5min) | 25 |
| High frequency flash & water deprivation (22h) | 5 | Shading (16h) | 26 |
| Wet pad | 6 | Fasting & mixed breeding | 27 |
| Restraint (0.5h) & rat tail with forceps clip (5min) | 7 | Water deprivation (16h) | 28 |
| Fasting & water deprivation (16h) | 8 | Elevated temperature in surroundings (16h) | 29 |
| Elevated temperature in surroundings (16h) | 9 | Light irradiation (12h) & cold water swimming (5min) | 30 |
| Rat screech (6h) & high frequency flash (16h) | 10 | Tilted rat cage at 30°angle& water deprivation (16h) | 31 |
| Light irradiation &water deprivation (16h) | 11 | Wet pad & fasting | 32 |
| Shading (16h) | 12 | Mixed breeding | 33 |
| High frequency flash (16h) | 13 | Shading (16h) | 34 |
| Mixed breeding | 14 | Restraint (0.5h) & rat tail with forceps clip (5min) | 35 |
| Elevated temperature in surroundings (16h) | 15 | Water deprivation (16h) | 36 |
| Shading (16h) & water deprivation (16h) | 16 | Cold water swimming (5min) | 37 |
| Rat screech (6h) & high frequency flash (16h) | 17 | Rat screech (6h) & Light irradiation (12h) | 38 |
| Light irradiation (16h) | 18 | High frequency flash (16h) | 39 |
| Restraint (0.5h) & rat tail with forceps clip (5min) | 19 | Shading (16h) & water deprivation (16h) | 40 |
| Tilted rat cage at 30°angle& water deprivation (16h) | 20 | Tilted rat cage at 30°angle | 41 |
| Wet pad& fasting | 21 | Cold water swimming (5min) | 42 |
Figure 2Schematic drawing of experimental schedule.
Figure 3Changes of sucrose preference ratio. The CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=18 rats per group at the 14th day; n=9 rats per group at the 42nd day. P<0.05 versus control group; △P<0.05 versus CUMS group; △△P<0.01 versus CUMS group.
Immobility time in forced swimming test.
| Groups | Immobility time (s) | |
|---|---|---|
| 14th day | 42nd day | |
| Control | 52.64 ± 9.30 | 43.25 ± 9.14 |
| CUMS | 43.33 ± 5.46 | 68.00 ± 4.97 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 3.6g/kg | 44.75 ± 5.90 | 57.00 ± 2.65 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 7.2g/kg | 55.83 ± 4.75 | 43.80 ± 5.11△△ |
| CUMS+XPKYF 14.4g/kg | 56.92 ± 5.55 | 45.33 ± 1.76△△ |
| CUMS+ sertraline 4.5mg/kg | 56.27 ± 7.63 | 51.40 ± 1.60△ |
Note: the CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=18 rats per group at the 14th day; n=9 rats per group at the 42nd day. P<0.01 versus control group; △P<0.05 versus CUMS group; △△P<0.01 versus CUMS group.
Figure 4Hippocampus ATP content. The CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=6 rats per group. P<0.05 versus control group.
Figure 5Gastrocnemius muscle ATP content. The CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=6 rats per group.
Figure 6Hippocampus Na/K-ATPase activity. The CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=6 rats per group. P<0.05 versus control group; △P<0.05 versus CUMS group; △△P<0.01 versus CUMS group.
Figure 7Gastrocnemius muscle Na/K-ATPase activity. The CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=6 rats per group. P<0.01 versus control group.
Changes of hippocampus complex I, II, III, and IV activities.
| Complex I | Complex II | Complex III | Complex IV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Control | 4.86 ± 0.35 | 1.92 ± 0.18 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.07 |
| CUMS | 3.45 ± 0.31 | 1.62 ± 0.11 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.52 ± 0.04 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 3.6g/kg | 4.22 ± 0.32 | 1.63 ± 0.11 | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 0.57 ± 0.03 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 7.2g/kg | 4.66 ± 0.23△ | 1.85 ± 0.13 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.06 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 14.4g/kg | 4.51 ± 0.27 | 1.76 ± 0.17 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.04 |
| CUMS+ sertraline 4.5mg/kg | 5.00 ± 0.35△△ | 1.79 ± 0.13 | 0.75 ± 0.07 | 0.56 ± 0.04 |
|
| ||||
| Control | 5.02 ± 0.39 | 1.81 ± 0.16 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 0.70 ± 0.09 |
| CUMS | 3.16 ± 0.26 | 1.68 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.07 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 3.6g/kg | 4.30 ± 0.38 | 1.78 ± 0.16 | 0.76 ± 0.07△ | 0.59 ± 0.10 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 7.2g/kg | 4.40 ± 0.50 | 1.70 ± 0.17 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.06 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 14.4g/kg | 4.27 ± 0.49 | 1.79 ± 0.15 | 0.78 ± 0.07△ | 0.64 ± 0.04 |
| CUMS+ sertraline 4.5mg/kg | 4.15 ± 0.19 | 1.73 ± 0.16 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.07 |
Note: the CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=6 rats per group. P<0.05 versus control group; △P<0.05 versus CUMS group; △△P<0.01 versus CUMS group.
Changes of gastrocnemius muscle complex I, II, III, and IV activities.
| Complex I | Complex II | Complex III | Complex IV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Control | 3.36 ± 0.30 | 1.69 ± 0.15 | 0.68 ± 0.08 | 0.51 ± 0.05 |
| CUMS | 2.65 ± 0.16 | 1.62 ± 0.18 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.41 ± 0.05 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 3.6g/kg | 3.02 ± 0.30 | 1.54 ± 0.15 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.04 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 7.2g/kg | 2.88 ± 0.30 | 1.34 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.05 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 14.4g/kg | 2.85 ± 0.29 | 1.45 ± 0.13 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.05 |
| CUMS+ sertraline 4.5mg/kg | 2.87 ± 0.23 | 1.42 ± 0.07 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.04 |
|
| ||||
| Control | 3.73 ± 0.41 | 1.99 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.08 |
| CUMS | 2.36 ± 0.20 | 1.41 ± 0.17 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.03 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 3.6g/kg | 3.00 ± 0.26 | 1.58 ± 0.15 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.43 ± 0.03 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 7.2g/kg | 2.75 ± 0.29 | 1.56 ± 0.21 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.05 |
| CUMS+XPKYF 14.4g/kg | 3.32 ± 0.28 | 1.67 ± 0.17 | 0.64 ± 0.06△ | 0.47 ± 0.05 |
| CUMS+ sertraline 4.5mg/kg | 3.02 ± 0.27 | 1.57 ± 0.21 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.07 |
Note: the CUMS procedures were performed 30 minutes after drug administration usually by gavage between 9am and 10am. Values were presented as mean ± SEM. n=6 rats per group. P<0.05 versus control group; P<0.01 versus control group; △P<0.05 versus CUMS group.
Figure 8Hippocampus and gastrocnemius muscle mitochondrial ultrastructure. CUMS paradigm damaged mitochondrial ultrastructure of hippocampus tissue and gastrocnemius muscle. Treatment with XPKYF or sertraline could prevent the damage of mitochondrial ultrastructure. n=3 rats per group.