Literature DB >> 30718884

Autonomous decision-making for antenatal screening in Pakistan: views held by women, men and health professionals in a low-middle income country.

Shenaz Ahmed1, Hussain Jafri2, Yasmin Rashid3, Huso Yi4, Dong Dong5, Jianfeng Zhu6, Mushtaq Ahmed7.   

Abstract

Prenatal genetic technologies now are being implemented in LMICs, and while there is much research on the ethical, legal and social implications of such technologies in Western countries, there is a paucity of such research in LMICs, which have diverse cultural, religious, political, financial and health service contexts. This study aimed to explore views about women's autonomous decision-making for antenatal screening held by women, men and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Pakistan. A Q-methodology study was conducted during June 2016 to January 2018 in Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 137 participants (60 women, 57 men, 20 HCPs) rank-ordered 41 statements. Following by-person factor analysis, four distinct viewpoints were identified. Three of these represent views held by women and men only: autonomous decision-making requires directive advice from doctors; autonomous decision-making requires the husband's involvement, where independent decision-making by the woman is considered culturally inappropriate; and opting for antenatal screening is a foregone decision. One contrasting viewpoint represents predominantly HCPs: autonomous decision-making is the couple's responsibility. These findings highlight that Western approaches to facilitating women's autonomy for antenatal screening are unlikely to be suitable for use in Pakistan. Instead, culturally appropriate practice guidelines are needed in LMICs to enable HCPs to adopt shared decision-making approaches in a way that enables them to facilitate active and joint decision-making by couples, while ensuring women exercise their autonomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30718884      PMCID: PMC6777451          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0353-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  6 in total

1.  Regional disparities in antenatal care utilization in Indonesia.

Authors:  Agung Dwi Laksono; Rukmini Rukmini; Ratna Dwi Wulandari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cascade screening for beta-thalassaemia in Pakistan: relatives' experiences of a decision support intervention in routine practice.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Hussain Jafri; Muhammed Faran; Wajeeha Naseer Ahmed; Yasmin Rashid; Yasmin Ehsan; Mushtaq Ahmed
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women's health outcomes from primary care interventions.

Authors:  Sara Rizvi Jafree; Qaisar Khalid Mahmood; Sohail Mujahid; Muhammad Asim; Jane Barlow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.

Authors:  Kate Churruca; Kristiana Ludlow; Wendy Wu; Kate Gibbons; Hoa Mi Nguyen; Louise A Ellis; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Urban-rural disparities of antenatal care in South East Asia: a case study in the Philippines and Indonesia.

Authors:  Ratna Dwi Wulandari; Agung Dwi Laksono; Nikmatur Rohmah
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy among Thai pregnant women and their spouses: a prospective survey.

Authors:  Kotchakorn Pairat; Chadakarn Phaloprakarn
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.