| Literature DB >> 30718746 |
Rai Muhammad Amir1, Muhammad Atif Randhawa2, Muhammad Nadeem3, Anwaar Ahmed1, Asif Ahmad1, Moazzam Rafiq Khan2, Muhammad Asif Khan4, Rukhsana Kausar5.
Abstract
Non-selective use of pesticide to increase productivity leaves residues on crops. These pesticides after consumption have a detrimental effect on human health and their intake can lead to various diseases such as kidney damage, neurological disorders, cardiovascular diseases, circulatory and reproductive problems. The recent study was designed to assess the effects of household processing treatments such as acidic solutions (acidic acid and citric acid), alkaline solutions (sodium chloride and sodium carbonate) and biological solutions (radish, ginger, garlic, and lemon extracts) were evaluated for their efficiency for removal of pesticides in spinach by gas chromatography with electron capture detector (GC-ECD). The results showed that pesticide residues were sharply reduced when spinach was exposed to washing treatments. The results showed that the greatest reduction of deltamethrin, cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos and endosulfan with 10% acetic acid was (79.68 ± 0.81%), (89.99 ± 0.12%), (94.21 ± 0.02%) and (70.32 ± 0.25%), respectively of tested washing solutions. The acidic solutions were more effective than alkaline and biological extracts in the removal of pesticide residues. The average reduction in various washing solutions ranged from 10.21 to 79.68%, 22.60 to 89.48%, 22.95 to 94-21% and 11.24-70.32% for the removal of deltamethrin, cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, and endosulfan, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30718746 PMCID: PMC6362137 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37936-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Treatment plan for mitigation of pesticide residues in spinach.
| Treatments | Concentrations (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 Unwashed Samples | — | — | — | — | — |
| T1 Tap water washing | — | — | — | — | — |
| T2 Acetic acid | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T3 Citric acid | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T4 Sodium chloride | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T5 Sodium carbonate | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T6 Ginger extract | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T7 Garlic extract | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T8 Radish extract | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| T9 Lemon extract | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Analysis of variance for pesticide residues reduction in spinach.
| Source of variations | Degrees of freedom | Mean squares | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deltamethrin | Cypermethrin | Chlorpyrifos | Endosulfan | ||
| Combinations | 40 | 1533.9** | 1214.6** | 1551.79** | 1059.7** |
| C vs others | 1 | 3901.9** | 2321.4** | 4029.86** | 2509.1** |
| Treatment (T) | 7 | 194.0** | 655.4** | 159.76** | 254.3** |
| Conc. (C) | 4 | 13913.9** | 10182.5** | 14189.88** | 9371.9** |
| Linear | 1 | 54314.1** | 39848.7** | 5440.37** | 36309.2** |
| Quadratic | 1 | 1106.7** | 669.1** | 1170.53** | 900.4** |
| Cubic | 1 | 143.6** | 150.8** | 128.84** | 194.9** |
| Quartic | 1 | 91.4** | 61.3** | 75.80** | 83.4** |
| T x C | 28 | 15.7** | 33.8** | 8.55** | 21.8** |
| Error | 82 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 1.2 |
| Total | 122 | ||||
NS = Non-significant (P > 0.05); *Significant (P < 0.05); **Highly significant (P < 0.01).
Interactive effects of treatments on reduction of deltamethrin residues in spinach.
| Treatment | Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 4% | 6% | 8% | 10% | |
| Acetic Acid | 12.12 ± 0.22t | 32.21 ± 0.24p | 54.55 ± 0.30k | 68.46 ± 0.42de | 79.68 ± 0.81a |
| Citric Acid | 11.67 ± 0.28t | 29.63 ± 0.63pq | 50.96 ± 0.50 l | 65.55 ± 0.23f | 74.52 ± 0.32b |
| Sodium Chloride | 11.79 ± 0.54t | 28.62 ± 0.53qr | 50.51 ± 0.29 l | 62.18 ± 0.22gh | 70.93 ± 0.53cd |
| Sodium carbonate | 12.12 ± 0.22t | 29.85 ± 0.74pq | 51.18 ± 0.59 l | 64.87 ± 0.34fg | 73.51 ± 0.35bc |
| Ginger extract | 11.34 ± 0.32t | 29.07 ± 0.37qr | 49.72 ± 0.55lm | 61.62 ± 0.43hi | 67.56 ± 0.53ef |
| Garlic extract | 11.00 ± 0.40t | 26.49 ± 0.85rs | 45.91 ± 0.39n | 58.03 ± 0.54j | 65.10 ± 0.34f |
| Reddish extract | 10.21 ± 0.58t | 23.79 ± 0.42s | 42.87 ± 0.62o | 51.40 ± 0.46l | 59.37 ± 0.35ij |
| Lemon extract | 11.22 ± 0.45t | 27.83 ± 0.82qr | 47.70 ± 0.58mn | 60.83 ± 0.41hi | 69.81 ± 0.56de |
Means sharing the similar letter in a row or in a column are statistically non-significant (P > 0.05). Small letters represent comparison among interaction means.
Interactive effects of treatments on reduction of cypermethrin residues in spinach.
| Treatment | Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 4% | 6% | 8% | 10% | |
| Acetic Acid | 31.88 ± 0.82s | 47.04 ± 0.33lm | 67.79 ± 0.11ef | 80.48 ± 0.59b | 89.99 ± 0.12a |
| Citric Acid | 27.80 ± 0.62t | 42.23 ± 0.23no | 64.37 ± 0.09fgh | 77.13 ± 0.34b | 86.63 ± 0.18a |
| Sodium Chloride | 23.88 ± 0.60u | 39.71 ± 0.62op | 58.78 ± 0.63i | 71.76 ± 0.30cd | 78.24 ± 0.86b |
| Sodium carbonate | 24.67 ± 0.64tu | 40.61 ± 0.32op | 61.07 ± 0.30hi | 73.21 ± 0.40c | 80.48 ± 1.31b |
| Ginger extract | 26.12 ± 0.62tu | 38.03 ± 1.07pq | 54.70 ± 0.33j | 65.21 ± 0.64efg | 73.04 ± 0.12c |
| Garlic extract | 22.60 ± 0.51u | 35.29 ± 0.20qrs | 50.73 ± 0.56kl | 60.79 ± 0.59hi | 65.89 ± 0.44efg |
| Reddish extract | 22.60 ± 0.51u | 33.89 ± 0.24rs | 45.75 ± 1.62mn | 54.42 ± 0.90jk | 60.68 ± 1.37hi |
| Lemon extract | 24.44 ± 0.52tu | 37.47 ± 0.52pqr | 53.41 ± 1.28jk | 62.81 ± 0.34gh | 68.68 ± 0.36de |
Means sharing the similar letter in a row or in a column are statistically non-significant (P > 0.05). Small letters represent comparison among interaction means.
Interactive effects of treatments on reduction of chlorpyrifos residues in spinach.
| Treatment | Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 4% | 6% | 8% | 10% | |
| Acetic Acid | 31.68 ± 0.01w | 48.39 ± 0.03p | 71.99 ± 0.01g | 85.95 ± 0.02c | 94.21 ± 0.02a |
| Citric Acid | 29.84 ± 0.06x | 44.62 ± 0.05q | 69.23 ± 0.01h | 82.64 ± 0.02d | 90.54 ± 0.04b |
| Sodium Chloride | 26.17 ± 0.01z | 40.22 ± 0.03l | 58.95 ± 0.02l | 69.05 ± 0.03h | 79.33 ± 0.03e |
| Sodium carbonate | 27.82 ± 0.02y | 41.87 ± 0.02r | 66.48 ± 0.01i | 79.70 ± 0.01e | 86.40 ± 0.04c |
| Ginger extract | 24.60 ± 0.03a | 37.46 ± 0.03t | 56.47 ± 0.01m | 65.38 ± 0.03i | 75.20 ± 0.01f |
| Garlic extract | 23.32 ± 0.05ab | 34.43 ± 0.03uv | 50.96 ± 0.01o | 60.78 ± 0.03k | 68.50 ± 0.04h |
| Reddish extract | 22.95 ± 0.02b | 33.42 ± 0.01v | 47.93 ± 0.05p | 58.03 ± 0.03l | 65.38 ± 0.04i |
| Lemon extract | 23.69 ± 0.02ab | 35.53 ± 0.03u | 53.71 ± 0.01n | 62.62 ± 0.03j | 71.25 ± 0.04g |
Means sharing the similar letter in a row or in a column are statistically non-significant (P > 0.05). Small letters represent comparison among interaction means.
Interactive effects of treatments on reduction of endosulfan residues in spinach.
| Treatment | Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 4% | 6% | 8% | 10% | |
| Acetic Acid | 13.37 ± 0.50q | 30.47 ± 0.14m | 51.10 ± 0.29fgh | 65.26 ± 0.18b | 70.32 ± 0.25a |
| Citric Acid | 12.59 ± 0.78q | 28.05 ± 2.05mn | 46.99 ± 0.30ij | 58.06 ± 0.21c | 67.12 ± 0.26ab |
| Sodium Chloride | 11.35 ± 0.75q | 24.45 ± 0.87nop | 40.08 ± 0.22l | 51.21 ± 0.56fgh | 57.51 ± 0.36c |
| Sodium carbonate | 12.53 ± 1.17q | 26.64 ± 0.59no | 46.37 ± 0.86jk | 57.05 ± 0.80cd | 65.60 ± 0.25b |
| Ginger extract | 11.97 ± 0.69q | 24.05 ± 0.49op | 42.72 ± 0.63kl | 51.60 ± 0.51efg | 56.66 ± 0.38cd |
| Garlic extract | 11.58 ± 0.32q | 23.50 ± 0.22op | 40.25 ± 0.31l | 49.18 ± 0.86g-j | 53.52 ± 0.42def |
| Reddish extract | 11.24 ± 0.95q | 22.76 ± 0.69p | 39.57 ± 0.63l | 47.78 ± 0.12hij | 50.14 ± 0.41f-i |
| Lemon extract | 12.03 ± 0.75q | 23.89 ± 0.54op | 40.47 ± 0.70l | 49.30 ± 0.06g-j | 54.97 ± 0.38cde |
Means sharing the similar letter in a row or in a column are statistically non-significant (P > 0.05). Small letters represent comparison among interaction means.