Literature DB >> 3071871

Reduction of surgery and mortality rate of bleeding peptic ulcer by endoscopic haemostasis with alcohol.

O Pascu1, A Draghici, I Acalovschi.   

Abstract

Eighty patients with peptic ulcers (45 duodenal ulcers, 30 gastric ulcers, and 5 stomal ulcers) presented at our emergency endoscopy unit with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (Forrest Ia, spurting bleeding; Forrest Ib, oozing bleeding) or stigmata of recent bleeding (Forrest II). They were divided into two groups, A and B, according to the day of the week on which emergency endoscopy was performed. Group A, consisting of 39 patients (24 duodenal ulcers, 13 gastric ulcers, and 2 stomal ulcers) was submitted to conventional treatment (blood transfusions, antacids, cimetidine, pirenzepine). Group B consisted of 41 patients (21 duodenal ulcers, 17 gastric ulcers and 3 stomal ulcers) on whom endoscopic haemostatic injection with absolute alcohol (Asaki's method) was performed. Patients of both groups underwent emergency surgery if the haemorrhage did not stop or if it recurred. In 10 cases (4 in group A and 6 in group B), elective surgery was performed, i.e. several days after the bleeding episode under conditions of haemodynamic safety. Endoscopic injection of absolute alcohol succeeded in arresting the haemorrhage in 17 of the 18 Forrest Ia and Ib cases and prevented recurrence in all Forrest II cases. Significant differences were recorded between the two groups as regards the number of patients undergoing surgery (18 to 7), emergency surgery (14 to 1) and the mortality (15% compared to 2.4%). The greatest difference was recorded between the postoperative mortality (27% in group A and 0% in group B).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3071871     DOI: 10.1007/bf00705329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  [Emergency endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage].

Authors:  B C Manegold
Journal:  Med Klin       Date:  1975-05-23

2.  Prompt endoscopic diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: its value for specific diagnosis and management.

Authors:  M C Iglesias; D Dourdourekas; J Adomavicius; F Villa; N Shobassy; F Steigmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  J A Forrest; N D Finlayson; D J Shearman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Conservative treatment of gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  S B Rofe; J M Duggan; E R Smith; C J Thursby
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Comparison of surgical and medical management of bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; M W Dronfield; M Atkinson; M J Langman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-02-20

6.  Prognosis of gastric ulcer: twenty-five year followup.

Authors:  M Kraus; G Mendeloff; R E Condon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Why have controlled trials failed to demonstrate a benefit of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding? A probability model analysis.

Authors:  R A Erickson; M E Glick
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Tissue solidification in coping with digestive tract bleeding: hemostatic effect of local injection of 99.5% ethanol.

Authors:  S Asaki
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Predictive clinical factors of visible vessel in bleeding peptic ulcer.

Authors:  F Fuster; J M Piqué; J Terés; J M Bordas; R M Perez; J Rodés
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Prognostic factors in upper G.I. bleeding.

Authors:  F T de Dombal; J R Clarke; S E Clamp; G Malizia; M R Kotwal; A G Morgan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.