Literature DB >> 30718501

Longitudinal investigation of DNA methylation changes preceding adolescent psychotic experiences.

Susanna Roberts1, Matthew Suderman2, Stanley Zammit3,4, Sarah H Watkins3, Eilis Hannon5, Jonathan Mill5, Caroline Relton2, Louise Arseneault1, Chloe C Y Wong1, Helen L Fisher6.   

Abstract

Childhood psychotic experiences (PEs), such as seeing or hearing things that others do not, or extreme paranoia, are relatively common with around 1 in 20 children reporting them at age 12. Childhood PEs are often distressing and can be predictive of schizophrenia, other psychiatric disorders, and suicide attempts in adulthood, particularly if they persist during adolescence. Previous research has demonstrated that methylomic signatures in blood could be potential biomarkers of psychotic phenomena. This study explores the association between DNA methylation (DNAm) and the emergence, persistence, and remission of PEs in childhood and adolescence. DNAm profiles were obtained from the ALSPAC cohort at birth, age 7, and age 15/17 (n = 901). PEs were assessed through interviews with participants at ages 12 and 18. We identified PE-associated probes (p < 5 × 10-5) and regions (corrected p < 0.05) at ages 12 and 18. Several of the differentially methylated probes were also associated with the continuity of PEs across adolescence. One probe (cg16459265), detected consistently at multiple timepoints in the study sample, was replicated in an independent sample of twins (n = 1658). Six regions, including those spanning the HLA-DBP2 and GDF7 genes, were consistently differentially methylated at ages 7 and 15-17. Findings from this large, population-based study suggest that DNAm at multiple stages of development may be associated with PEs in late childhood and adolescence, though further replication is required. Research uncovering biomarkers associated with pre-clinical PEs is important as it has the potential to facilitate early identification of individuals at increased risk who could benefit from preventive interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30718501      PMCID: PMC6361958          DOI: 10.1038/s41398-019-0407-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Psychiatry        ISSN: 2158-3188            Impact factor:   6.222


Introduction

Psychotic experiences (PEs), such as hearing voices, seeing visions, or being extremely paranoid, are experienced by around 1 in 20 children[1], usually without a diagnosable illness. In most children these experiences remit, but nonetheless they are associated with later psychiatric problems such as psychotic disorders[2], including schizophrenia[3,4], and post-traumatic stress disorder[3], as well as suicidality and self-harm in adolescence[1,5], and suicide attempts in adulthood[3]. The likelihood of developing a psychotic disorder[6] or post-traumatic stress disorder[7] is especially increased if PEs persist during adolescence. Therefore, it is important to identify as early as possible which children are at risk of developing these experiences. Uncovering biomarkers associated with the onset and persistence of pre-clinical PEs in childhood can increase our understanding of the aetiological factors accompanying the development and progression of PEs, and may in the future facilitate early identification of individuals at increased psychiatric risk, and improve targeting of preventive interventions. Biomarkers for the emergence and persistence of PEs might be evident at the level of epigenetics, that is by any of the many cellular mechanisms capable of regulating gene expression without changes in the underlying genetic sequence. DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns have, for example, been associated with a broad range of psychiatric phenotypes[8-14], including schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Research in monozygotic twin pairs discordant for a clinical diagnosis of psychosis[15] and in case–control samples[16-22] has identified DNAm differences associated with psychosis. Importantly, these findings were identified not only in post-mortem brain tissue from diagnosed individuals[19,21,22], but also in peripheral samples from living patients[15-18,20], and studies have replicated findings from peripheral samples in post-mortem tissue[15]. To date, the majority of studies have relied on cross-sectional analyses of DNAm and psychotic disorder status. Cross-sectional studies with affected individuals are likely to be highly confounded by factors associated with the disorder, such as medication. Crucially, few epigenetic studies have utilised prospective designs to focus on pre-clinical psychotic phenomena in the general population, which are important to optimise early detection efforts. To this end, research from our group recently demonstrated specific DNAm differences at age 10 between monozygotic twin pairs discordant for psychotic symptoms at age 12 (n = 48;[23]). Of note, hypomethylation of the top-ranked CpG site was replicated in post-mortem brain tissue in an independent sample of schizophrenia patients compared to controls, and several of the findings of interest were located in, or near, genes previously implicated in neurodevelopment and psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, a recent study found that conversion to psychosis in young help-seeking individuals (an ultra-high risk group, n = 39) was associated with differential changes in DNAm, with top results occurring in pathways relevant for psychosis such as oxidative stress regulation, axon guidance and inflammatory pathways[24]. These studies indicate that the PEs in pre-diagnosis populations may be associated with differential DNAm, and that the pattern of PEs may correspond with changes in DNAm in relevant pathways. However, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions based on such small samples that may not be representative of the broader population. The aim of this study was to explore associations between genome-wide DNAm patterns and the emergence and persistence of PEs in childhood and adolescence utilising a longitudinal design covering key points in development in a large, population-based sample. First, we investigated the association between DNAm at specific timepoints during childhood and adolescence (birth, age 7, and age 15–17) and reports of PEs at ages 12 and 18. Second, we examined the role of DNAm in the continuity of PEs by comparing individuals whose experiences persisted between 12 and 18 years with those whose experiences remitted, emerged for the first time during adolescence, and those with no history of such experiences. Third, we explored the association between longitudinal trajectories of DNAm and PEs across early development. Fourth, we investigated differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with PEs. Finally, we tested the robustness of these findings in an independent sample.

Methods

Sample

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a large, prospective cohort study that recruited 14,541 pregnant women resident in Avon, UK with expected dates of delivery between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992[25,26]. Further details of the study and available data are provided on the study website through a fully searchable data dictionary (http://www.bris.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/data-access/data-dictionary/). The current study focusses on the Accessible Resource for Integrated Epigenomic Studies (ARIES) sub-study, which consists of 1018 mother–offspring pairs who provided DNA samples at multiple timepoints[27]. All data are available by request from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Executive Committee (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Written informed consent was provided by parents and assent by children during the childhood phases of the study, and then by the children themselves at age 18. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Ethical approvals are in place for all sources of biological samples and data in ARIES in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Measures

Psychotic experiences

PEs at ages 12 and 18 were assessed via semi-structured interviews (Psychosis-like symptoms semi-structured interview—PLIKSi) that have been described previously[2,28]. At 12 years participants were asked about PEs over the previous 6 months; at 18 years participants were asked about experiences since the age of 12. Further details regarding determination of PEs in this sample are provided in the Supplementary Information. For longitudinal analyses, individuals were included if they had PE data available at both timepoints, and the nature of PEs from ages 12 to 18 was determined as persistent (present at both timepoints), remitted (present at 12 but not 18), emergent (present at 18 but not 12), and none (no experiences at either timepoint).

DNA methylation

DNA samples were extracted from cord blood on delivery, and from peripheral blood samples in childhood (age 7) and in adolescence (age 15–17) according to established procedures[27]. DNA was bisulfite-converted using the Zymo EZ DNA MethylationTM kit (Zymo, Irvine, CA) and then DNA methylation of over 485,000 CpG sites was quantified using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip assay (HM450; Illumina Inc., CA). Arrays were scanned using the Illumina iScan, and GenomeStudio (version 2011.1; Illumina Inc.) was used to extract signal intensities and assess initial quality review.

Pre-processing and QC procedures

HM450 detects the proportion of molecules methylated at each CpG site on the array. For each sample, the estimated methylation level at each CpG site is expressed as a beta value (β), which is the ratio of the methylated probe intensity to the overall intensity and ranges from 0 (no cytosine methylation) to 1 (complete cytosine methylation). Background correction and functional normalisation were performed using meffil[29]. Samples with >10% of sites with a detection p value >0.01 or a bead count <3 in >10% of probes were removed from further analysis. Non-specific probes and probes on sex chromosomes were removed[30,31]. Following QC procedures, data were available for 381,871 probes. Probes were annotated using information provided by Illumina (genome build: hg19).

Batch effects

Samples from all timepoints in ARIES were distributed across slides using a semi-random approach, with all samples from each individual presented on the same array to minimise confounding by batch. Further batch variables were recorded using a purpose-built laboratory information management system, which also recorded QC metrics from the standard control probes on the HM450 array. Samples failing QC (>20% probes with p ≥ 0.01) were repeated and, if unsuccessful, excluded from further analysis.

Cell heterogeneity

To account for potential differences in methylation arising from cell composition in whole-blood samples, cell counts were estimated using the Houseman algorithm[32] and included as covariates. However, for longitudinal analyses including data from cord blood and whole-blood samples, analyses instead included the first 20 independent surrogate variable components to account for both heterogeneity between cord blood and peripheral blood samples as well as batch effects. Previous research has indicated that surrogate variables derived in this way account for cell count heterogeneity as well as estimated cell counts[33,34].

Potential confounders

Pregnancy and birth-related variables were considered as potential confounders, including parity (number of pregnancies resulting in live birth), maternal age at child’s birth (derived from date of birth), maternal smoking during pregnancy (never, stopped first trimester, continued throughout pregnancy), infections during pregnancy (at any time), and delivery method (caesarean; yes/no). Factors relating to the child included gender, smoking, and use of psychiatric medications. Data concerning child smoking behaviour during adolescence were not available for all samples; therefore, a proxy smoking variable was derived using DNAm signals from probes previously associated with smoking[35,36]. This method has been shown to distinguish between smokers and non-smokers (e.g. see [20]). One child reported use of psychiatric medications across the study period and was removed from the analysis sample.

Statistical analyses

We investigated the association between DNAm and PEs in four stages. All analyses were conducted using R (version 3.3.1) unless otherwise stated.

Epigenome-wide Association Study

The Epigenome-wide Association Study (EWAS) function in meffil[29] was used to conduct six epigenome-wide association studies of PEs at ages 12 and 18 with cord blood, age-7 peripheral blood, and age-15/17 peripheral blood DNAm. Parity, maternal age, maternal smoking during pregnancy, infections during pregnancy, delivery methods, and child’s gender were included as covariates, as well as estimated cell counts. Analyses using DNAm data from age 7 or age 15–17 also included child age as a covariate. Probes with values at the extremes of the distribution (5%) were winsorised. Statistical significance was determined using a Bonferroni correction, giving a threshold of p < 1.3 × 10−7. Tests with p < 5 × 10−5 were defined as reaching suggestive significance.

Continuity of PEs across adolescence

The CpG sites most strongly associated with PEs at either timepoint (12 or 18, p < 5 × 10−5) were assessed for association with the continuity of PEs between 12 and 18 (persistent, remitted, emergent, none) using ANOVA. Post hoc tests were used to determine the relationships between groups. Significant results (p < 0.00045; p = 0.05/110 CpG sites) were re-run with linear models to include all previously described covariates.

Longitudinal DNAm trajectories and continuity of PEs

Multilevel models were constructed to test the association between the methylomic trajectories of the top CpG sites and the continuity of PEs across adolescence, where DNAm was the dependent variable. A linear spline term with a knot at 7 was included to allow for different linear changes from 0 to 7 and from 7 to 15–17. Models were also adjusted for all previously described pregnancy and birth-related covariates, and the first 20 independent surrogate variable components to account for heterogeneity between cord blood and peripheral blood samples (e.g. cell composition and batch effects). Models were repeated including derived smoking scores as previously described.

Differentially methylated regions

The comb-p module in Python was used to identify DMRs by combining spatially correlated p values from each EWAS. We used a seed p value of <0.001, a maximum distance of 500 bp, and a minimum of three probes. Statistical significance was determined using a Šidák correction for multiple testing, where p < 0.05 is significant.

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis

Enrichment analyses were conducted to assess the over-representation of GO[37] biological processes and functions in CpG sites of each EWAS where p < 0.001. A lenient significance threshold was used to maximise our probes of interest. We used a methodology that controls for the number of probes that are annotated to each gene, as well as taking into account the hierarchical structure of ontological categories by grouping terms where the significant enrichment was explained by the overlap with a more significant term (as described in ref. [20]).

Replication

CpG sites of interest (detailed below) were tested for association with PEs in the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a nationally representative cohort of 2232 British-born twins, which has been previously described in detail[38]. In this sample, DNAm from whole-blood samples obtained at age 18 was also quantified using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip assay (HM450; Illumina Inc., CA)[39], and PEs between 12 and 18 years were obtained from an interview that is similar to the PLIKSi[40]. Following stringent quality control procedures using the wateRmelon package[41], data were available for 1658 individuals at age 18. The associations between DNAm at our CpG sites of interest and concurrent PEs at age 18 were tested using linear regression, controlling for gender, zygosity, batch, and cell counts (determined using the Houseman algorithm as previously described). Clustered standard errors were used to calculate p values to account for the effect of family, and were implemented using the plm package[42]. For the closest consistency between timepoints in the two studies, CpG sites associated with PEs at age 18 (p < 5 × 10−5) in the age 15–17 DNAm data from ALSPAC were tested in the E-Risk sample. Consistently detected CpG sites, that is, those detected in the top 100 most significant results of more than one EWAS in ALSPAC, were also tested in the E-Risk sample.

Results

Sample characteristics

DNAm data were available on 901 samples from cord blood, 966 at age 7, and 966 at age 15–17 (n = 845 with all three). In those with at least one DNA sample (n = 999), 978 had PE data available for at least one timepoint (age 12: n = 929; age 18: n = 816). At age 12, 12.5% (n = 116) reported PEs. At age 18, 8.8% (n = 72) reported PEs. In total, 767 individuals had DNAm and PE data available for all timepoints. Of those, 81.4% had no PEs at either timepoint; 10.2% had PEs that remitted between 12 and 18; 6.2% had PEs that emerged between 12 and 18; and 2.2% had PEs that were persistent between 12 and 18. Sample characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1

Sample descriptives

DNA methylation from cord bloodDNA methylation at age 7DNA methylation at age 17
PEs at age 12 (n)833900899
PEs at age 18 (n)739791787
Characteristic n % (missing n )
PEs at age 1211612.569
PEs at age 18728.8182
Parity 35
 045146.8
 135837.2
 211712.1
 3373.8
Maternal ageMean = 29.5sd = 4.46
Maternal smoking 18
 Never84786.4
 Stopped during pregnancy363.7
 Continued throughout pregnancy979.9
Infections during pregnancy44544.6
Caesarean section delivery929.640
Sex (male)48548.6

PEs psychotic experiences

Sample descriptives PEs psychotic experiences

DNAm and PEs—overview

Differences in DNAm at birth, age 7, and ages 15–17 between those with and without PEs at ages 12 and 18 did not survive correction for multiple testing (p < 1.3 × 10−7; reflecting 381,871 sites in each analysis). However, a number of methylation probes were nominally significant in each analysis (p < 5 × 10−5, detailed in the Supplementary Information). The top 20 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) for each analysis are detailed in Table 2a–f, with a more extensive list provided in Supplementary Tables (top 100 DMPs: Tables S1–S6). Comparison of the top 100 DMPs across analyses showed three CpG sites (cg16459265, cg24940155, cg25184754) detected in more than one analysis and with the same direction of effect, and nine genes that were detected in more than one analysis but with different CpG sites (Supplementary Table S7).
Table 2a

Cord blood methylation and age-12 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes

Probep valuet statisticChromosomeAnnotated gene
cg20862283 8.66E-06 4.48 chr2
cg10490202 1.21E-05 −4.4 chr17 RPTOR
cg21040096 2.15E-05 4.27 chr17 RPH3AL
cg18752363 2.21E-05 −4.27 chr4 C4orf10;NOP14
cg11271415 3.15E-05 4.19 chr8 FBXO32
cg20083186 4.06E-05 4.13 chr3
cg00712792 4.28E-05 −4.11 chr16 SPIRE2
cg119365565.14E-054.07chr5
cg148922225.15E-054.07chr15GOLGA8A
cg266726525.25E-054.07chr8PXDNL
cg137511885.26E-05−4.07chr11TECTA
cg148298145.39E-054.06chr12
cg263020096.39E-054.02chr6PHACTR1
cg018401156.94E-05−4chr13
cg068933797.29E-053.99chr5
cg044090487.41E-053.98chr6
cg081053787.57E-05−3.98chr19HOMER3
cg074385867.92E-05−3.97chr6GNL1
cg041142698.76E-05−3.94chr3C3orf26;FILIP1L;MIR548G

Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

Table 2f

Age 15–17 methylation and age-18 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes

Probep valuet statisticChromosomeAnnotated gene
cg25975712 1.13E-05 4.42 chr22 FAM19A5
cg24177611 1.15E-05 −4.42 chr10 KNDC1
cg25324164 1.57E-05 −4.35 chr11 FADS2
cg15986671 4.00E-05 −4.13 chr7
cg16073378 4.74E-05 4.09 chr2
cg04942547 4.82E-05 −4.09 chr20 ZFP64
cg113335765.26E-05−4.07chr19SHC2
cg164592655.51E-05−4.06chr7C7orf40;SNORA9
cg092223677.68E-05−3.98chr15IQGAP1
cg234157561.02E-043.91chr17NTN1
cg186568291.14E-043.88chr13
cg060464311.15E-043.88chr11BDNF
cg167914441.17E-04−3.87chr17
cg116047281.17E-04−3.87chr7POU6F2;POU6F2
cg220127591.19E-04−3.87chr1
cg190523551.25E-043.86chr2GBX2
cg055806551.30E-043.85chr3SCHIP1
cg167401571.43E-04−3.82chr6
cg265304970.000156178−3.8chr13SOHLH2
cg197693010.0001567173.8chr1

Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

Cord blood methylation and age-12 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5 Cord blood methylation and age-18 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5 Age-7 methylation and age-12 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5 Age-7 methylation and age-18 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5 Age 15–17 methylation and age-12 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5 Age 15–17 methylation and age-18 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

Cord blood DNAm and PEs

Analysis of cord blood DNAm identified seven nominally significant CpG sites associated with age-12 PEs (Table 2a), and five with age-18 PEs (Table 2b). The top CpG site at age 12 was cg20862283 (p = 8.66 × 10-6), which was not mapped to a RefSeq gene. GO enrichment analysis of the CpG sites where p < 0.001 from analysis of PEs at age 12 identified 104 groups of related GO categories (p < 0.05, Table S8). At age 18, the top CpG site was cg00407329 (p = 1.84 × 10−5), which was annotated with the gene SIM1. Fifty-one groups of GO enrichment terms were identified (Table S9). Ranked highly among the grouped terms were “Wnt-activated receptor activity” and “central nervous system neuron development”. The top-ranked terms did not show any similarities between timepoints.
Table 2b

Cord blood methylation and age-18 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes

Probep valuet statisticChromosomeAnnotated gene
cg00407329 1.84E-05 4.31 chr6 SIM1
cg17972930 2.76E-05 4.22 chr15 USP50
cg07571954 3.22E-05 −4.18 chr10 C10orf131
cg05138918 4.56E-05 −4.1 chr3
cg17843418 4.64E-05 −4.1 chr17 TBC1D16
cg211679058.29E-053.96chr1C1orf9
cg098250808.67E-05−3.95chr16
cg024241039.58E-053.92chr3
cg164267640.0001−3.9chr10LHPP
cg006802770.000123.87chr2TTC15
cg234636080.00012−3.86chr19GNG7
cg259301860.00012−3.86chr20MOCS3;DPM1
cg013952810.00013−3.86chr1ZNF593
cg252757500.000153.82chr13TBC1D4
cg163276470.00016−3.8chr1CENPF
cg014961360.00017−3.78chr16
cg095686470.00017−3.77chr5
cg226948180.000183.77chr1LHX8
cg064752230.00018−3.76chr18LAMA3
cg128591120.000193.76chr6TMEM14B

Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

Age-7 DNAm and PEs

Analysis of age-7 DNAm identified 63 nominally significant CpG sites associated with age-12 PEs (Table 2c), and 19 with age-18 PEs (Table 2d). At age 12, the top CpG site was cg22499215 (p = 2.97 × 10−7), which was not annotated with a RefSeq gene. In the top CpG sites, 92 groups of GO terms were identified (Table S10), including a number of terms related to brain development and “Wnt signalling pathway”. At age 18, the top CpG site was cg00995854 (p = 2.74 × 10−6, CD5L). In GO enrichment analysis, 137 groups of terms were identified (Table S11). The top-ranked term was “proteoglycan binding”, including a number of terms related to immune processes, as well as “neurogenesis” and terms representing neuron development and projection. The top-ranked terms did not show any similarities between timepoints.
Table 2c

Age-7 methylation and age-12 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes

Probep valuet statisticChromosomeAnnotated gene
cg22499215 2.97E-07 −5.16 chr22
cg14263553 1.12E-06 −4.9 chr8
cg07366553 2.35E-06 −4.75 chr22 SELO
cg09553452 2.75E-06 −4.72 chr16 CDH5
cg02284814 4.82E-06 −4.6 chr1 PPP1R12B
cg17160666 4.95E-06 −4.6 chr10
cg17139666 5.04E-06 4.59 chr4
cg08032135 5.08E-06 4.59 chr8 NRG1
cg04584761 1.00E-05 −4.56 chr2 SUPT7L
cg10756647 1.00E-05 4.55 chr7 PSPH
cg16451872 1.00E-05 4.54 chr15 UBE3A
cg10725301 1.00E-05 −4.52 chr6 ZKSCAN3
cg18477816 1.00E-05 −4.52 chr11 IRF7
cg10143301 1.00E-05 4.51 chr5 TXNDC15
cg02572956 1.00E-05 −4.48 chr7 CHPF2;MIR671
cg01040786 1.00E-05 −4.41 chr5
cg02975060 1.00E-05 −4.4 chr14 MIR1185-2
cg23658045 1.00E-05 4.4 chr12 DCTN2
cg10151454 1.00E-05 −4.36 chr10 EBF3
cg10303842 2.00E-05 4.35 chr5 CDH12

Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

Table 2d

Age-7 methylation and age-18 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes

Probep valuet statisticChromosomeAnnotated gene
cg00995854 2.74E-06 −4.72 chr1 CD5L
cg13845105 3.08E-06 −4.7 chr12 RPL6
cg27190398 8.76E-06 −4.48 chr16 STUB1;JMJD8
cg07143863 9.18E-06 −4.47 chr12
cg10468951 1.33E-05 −4.38 chr3 C3orf45
cg05927274 1.79E-05 −4.32 chr1
cg09936919 1.90E-05 −4.3 chr2
cg15129144 1.95E-05 −4.3 chr2 EPAS1
cg03332469 2.00E-05 4.28 chr7
cg02743632 2.00E-05 −4.28 chr1 HLX
cg20477259 2.00E-05 −4.25 chr6 TNF
cg24110396 3.00E-05 −4.22 chr10 CCNY
cg27185423 3.00E-05 −4.21 chr15
cg08522143 3.00E-05 −4.19 chr19 ZNF14
cg04936274 3.00E-05 −4.18 chr10
cg14468692 3.00E-05 −4.18 chr11 RNH1
cg15031103 4.00E-05 −4.15 chr10 LRRC27
cg05072413 4.00E-05 −4.11 chr22 FAM19A5
cg16459265 4.00E-05 −4.11 chr7 C7orf40;SNORA9
cg021081355.00E-05−4.06chr17

Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

Age-15–17 DNAm and PEs

Analysis of age-15–17 DNAm identified ten nominally significant CpG sites associated with age-12 PEs (Table 2e), and six with age-18 PEs (Table 2f). At age 12, the top CpG site was cg14284469 (p = 1.87 × 10−6, STMN2), and 114 grouped GO terms were identified (Table S12). At age 18, the top CpG site was cg25975712 (p = 1.13 × 10−5, FAM19A5), and 123 grouped GO terms were identified (Table S13). The top-ranked term was “rostrocaudal neural tube patterning”, which largely included terms related to neuronal and physical development and morphogenesis. Also within the top grouped terms were “behavioural fear response” and “behavioural defense response”. The top-ranked terms did not show any similarities between timepoints.
Table 2e

Age 15–17 methylation and age-12 psychotic experiences: top 20 probes

Probep valuet statisticChromosomeAnnotated gene
cg14284469 1.87E-06 4.8 chr8 STMN2
cg00956759 2.94E-06 −4.71 chr17
cg12009697 4.13E-06 −4.63 chr2
cg21602768 8.15E-06 −4.49 chr20 ABHD12
cg17027353 1.25E-05 4.39 chr6
cg14386808 1.34E-05 −4.38 chr8
cg22035229 1.77E-05 −4.32 chr1 MSH4
cg16817992 2.11E-05 4.28 chr7 KCNH2
cg25344401 3.26E-05 4.18 chr7 FOXK1
cg05942128 4.71E-05 4.09 chr2 HOXD11
cg263707295.19E-054.07chr5F2RL1
cg250247345.84E-054.04chr10
cg039453016.32E-05−4.02chr6EHMT2
cg171034677.84E-05−3.97chr1WDR8
cg246959777.92E-053.97chr1
cg045542408.12E-05−3.96chr3ESYT3
cg086217731.02E-04−3.9chr2
cg272803321.04E-04−3.9chr12
cg258277100.00011−3.88chr13LCP1
cg153181760.00012−3.86chr7PTPRN2

Italic rows indicate p < 5 × 10−5

DNAm from cord blood, at age 7, and at ages 15–17 and continuity of PEs between ages 12 and 18

Next, we tested the association between timepoint-specific DNAm and continuity of PEs across adolescence for each of the top CpG sites in each EWAS (p < 5 × 10−5). Results for these analyses are provided in the Supplementary Information, Table S14. Different patterns of DNAm at each timepoint were observed in relation to PE continuity. At some CpG sites, statistical differences between the groups were limited to one group (e.g. cg18752363, Fig. 1a). At other CpG sites, individuals whose PEs had remitted by age 18 had DNAm profiles more similar to those who never had any PEs, whereas those with persistent PEs tended to show the greatest differences in DNAm profiles, while those whose PEs emerged between 12 and 18 often had intermediary differences between the none/remitted groups and the persistent group (e.g. cg16459265, Fig. 1d; full statistical results reported in Table S14, Fig. 1a–f).
Fig. 1

a–f DNA methylation and the continuity of psychotic experiences (PEs) between ages 12 and 18. Boxplots represent the most strongly associated CpG site (tested using ANOVA) at each timepoint. a DNA methylation from cord blood, CpG site detected at age 12; b DNA methylation from cord blood, CpG site detected at age 18; c DNA methylation at age 7, CpG site detected at age 12; d DNA methylation at age 7, CpG site detected at age 18; e DNA methylation at age 15–17, CpG site detected at age 12; f DNA methylation at age 15–17, CpG site detected at age 18. For each boxplot, 0 = never had PEs, 1 = PEs remitted between 12 and 18, 2 = PEs emerged between 12 and 18, and 3 = PEs persisted between 12 and 18 years. Circles represent group means. PLIKSi Psychosis-like symptoms semi-structured interview

a–f DNA methylation and the continuity of psychotic experiences (PEs) between ages 12 and 18. Boxplots represent the most strongly associated CpG site (tested using ANOVA) at each timepoint. a DNA methylation from cord blood, CpG site detected at age 12; b DNA methylation from cord blood, CpG site detected at age 18; c DNA methylation at age 7, CpG site detected at age 12; d DNA methylation at age 7, CpG site detected at age 18; e DNA methylation at age 15–17, CpG site detected at age 12; f DNA methylation at age 15–17, CpG site detected at age 18. For each boxplot, 0 = never had PEs, 1 = PEs remitted between 12 and 18, 2 = PEs emerged between 12 and 18, and 3 = PEs persisted between 12 and 18 years. Circles represent group means. PLIKSi Psychosis-like symptoms semi-structured interview

Longitudinal DNAm changes and continuity of PEs

We tested the association between longitudinal DNAm and continuity of PEs between 12 and 18 for the previously identified top CpG sites. Results are provided in Supplementary Table 15 for the full longitudinal model. Longitudinal models were unaffected by the inclusion of a DNAm-derived smoking score. For several CpG sites, the methylation trajectory was nominally different between groups (remitted, emergent, or persistent PEs—examples are given in Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

a, b DNA methylation trajectories by PLIKSi psychotic experiences (PEs) group: 0 = no PEs at either timepoint; 1 = PEs at age 12 that remitted by age 18; 2 = no PEs at age 12 but emerged by age 18; 3 = PEs that persisted from age 12 to age 18. a cg16459265 methylation and PEs. b cg25975712 methylation and PEs. Lines represent mean DNA methylation per sample timepoint; bars represent standard errors. PLIKSi Psychosis-like symptoms semi-structured interview

a, b DNA methylation trajectories by PLIKSi psychotic experiences (PEs) group: 0 = no PEs at either timepoint; 1 = PEs at age 12 that remitted by age 18; 2 = no PEs at age 12 but emerged by age 18; 3 = PEs that persisted from age 12 to age 18. a cg16459265 methylation and PEs. b cg25975712 methylation and PEs. Lines represent mean DNA methylation per sample timepoint; bars represent standard errors. PLIKSi Psychosis-like symptoms semi-structured interview

Differentially methylated regions

We tested for DMRs using the comb-p algorithm. Significant DMRs (Šidák corrected p < 0.05) were detected at all timepoints, and are detailed in the Supplementary Information (Table S16). Nine DMRs were identified in cord blood associated with age-12 PEs; four with age-18 PEs. Thirty-five DMRs were identified in age-7 samples associated with age-12 PEs, 11 with age-18 PEs. Fourteen DMRs were identified in age 15–17 samples associated with age-12 PEs, 11 with age-18 PEs. Of note, six regions were differentially methylation in association with either age-12 or age-18 PEs in both age-7 and age 15–17 samples, spanning regions including HLA-DPB2 and HIVEP3 (associated with age-12 PEs), and GDF7 (age-18 PEs). A full list of significant DMRs at each timepoint is available in the Supplementary Information, Table S16.

Replication

No associations between DNAm at age 15–17 and PEs at age 18 in the ALSPAC sample were replicated in the E-Risk sample (all p’s > 0.05). However, DNAm at the CpG site cg16459265 (consistently detected among the top 100 CpG sites in the ALSPAC sample across the different ages) was found to be associated with age-18 PEs in the E-Risk sample. At this probe, individuals with any PEs at age 18 had marginally lower DNAm than those without PEs (difference = −0.76%, p = 0.0029) in keeping with the hypomethylation found in the ALSPAC sample.

Discussion

Summary

This study utilised longitudinal data in a large, population-based sample to investigate the association between epigenome-wide DNAm patterns and the emergence and persistence of PEs in childhood and adolescence. While no CpG sites reached Bonferroni-corrected significance in this study, a number of CpG sites and genes in biological pathways relevant to psychosis appeared highly ranked in these analyses. Genes detected in the top 100 CpG sites of more than one analysis (though not with the same CpG site) included BAIAP2, FGFR3 and MAD1L1, and genetic mutations in these genes have previously been implicated in susceptibility to psychotic disorders[43-45]. Also consistently detected were LFNG and LRP5, part of the Notch and Wnt signalling pathways (respectively), which have been reported in previous studies of psychiatric phenotypes including schizophrenia[46,47]. None of the individual CpG sites associated with PEs at age 18 in the ALSPAC sample were replicated in the independent E-Risk sample. Nonetheless, attempts to replicate these results should be undertaken in other large population-based longitudinal samples. Using a DMR approach, six regions associated with PEs were detected consistently in both age-7 and age 15–17 samples. The top DMR associated with age-12 PEs at age 7 (and also significant at age 15–17) spanned 18 probes in the HLA-DPB2, part of the major histocompatibility complex on chromosome 6, which has been widely implicated in schizophrenia[48]. The top DMR associated with age-18 PEs in age-7 samples overlapped substantially with the top DMR in age 15–17 samples, spanning 7–9 probes on chromosome 2 at exon 2 of the GDF7 gene. DNAm at this gene has previously been associated with early age of onset in anorexia nervosa[49] and is thought to play a role in nervous system development. The top CpG sites identified showed interesting patterns of change in DNAm across development according to the continuity of PEs across adolescence. Some CpG sites distinguished individuals whose PEs remitted or never had PEs from those whose experiences persisted across or emerged during adolescence. An example is CpG site cg16459265 (annotated to the RefSeq genes C7orf40;SNORA9), a top CpG site associated with age-18 PEs in DNA samples from both childhood (age 7) and adolescence (ages 15–17). Lower DNAm at this CpG site was also associated with PEs at age 18 in the E-Risk sample. Similarly, at the CpG site cg25975712 (FAM19A5), DNAm patterns diverged during childhood according to PE status, but by adolescence, those whose PEs remitted had DNAm profiles more similar to those with no PEs (though it should be noted that DNAm is generally low at this CpG site).

Comparison to the literature

Two studies have previously investigated the association between DNAm and subclinical psychotic phenomena. However, there are some differences in the study design between the current study and this previous research. We utilised DNAm from birth to adolescence in a large, population-based, unrelated sample, whereas earlier studies were conducted in smaller samples of monozygotic twin pairs discordant for childhood psychotic symptoms[23] or examined conversion to psychosis in ultra-high risk, help-seeking individuals[24]. Study participants also differed in age at sample collection (ages 5 and 10 in ref. [23]; age 16–30 in ref. [24]) and sample type (buccal swabs in ref. [23]). The differences in time periods are an important consideration when comparing these studies, as there is little concurrence. The current study considers a broad span of ages, compared to shorter intervals or more specific timepoints reported in the previous reports. While the ages included in this study cover important timepoints developmentally, it is not possible to accurately infer what is happening in the intervening years, or identify changes in DNAm accompanying the specific period that the PEs were measured. As such, it is perhaps unsurprising that none of the CpG site associations detected here are seen in either previous study. Furthermore, we do not have information regarding psychotic phenomena in the years following those included in this study. Nevertheless, associations linked to a small number of genes are observed across the studies. One example is the gene PTPRN2, which is thought to be necessary for normal neurotransmitter activity in the brain. Of note, the DMR located on chromosome 6 (and annotated to the gene HLA-DPB2) which was associated with age-12 PEs in our study substantially overlaps with a similar DMR detected in prefrontal cortex samples associated with polygenic risk for schizophrenia[50]. Taken together, these studies provide tentative early evidence for potential methylomic changes accompanying the development of early psychosis-related phenomena, albeit with some inconsistency regarding the location of these changes.

Methodological considerations

This study has a number of strengths. Analyses were conducted in the relatively large ARIES sample drawn from a population-based cohort study, with DNAm profiled at multiple timepoints across early development and PEs assessed in childhood and adolescence. Prospective collection of high-quality phenotypic data in this cohort allowed for investigation of the temporal relationship between DNAm and PEs and repeated assessments enabled investigation of trajectories of methylation and continuity of PEs. Extensive data regarding potential confounding factors were also available and included in the analyses. Furthermore, this is the largest study to date to examine the association between DNAm and pre-clinical PEs. Research investigating DNAm in psychotic disorders is typically performed in adult samples, where the confounding effects of medication use are difficult to avoid. As ARIES is a young, population-based sample, only one participant was using psychiatric medication (and was excluded from these analyses). Additionally, the longitudinal investigation of early pre-clinical psychotic experiences is particularly important to better understand biological factors associated with the aetiology of psychotic and other psychiatric disorders and facilitate early identification of those at risk. However, there are methodological factors that should be taken into consideration when interpreting these results. Firstly, DNAm data were generated from peripheral samples (cord blood and whole blood). This approach is necessary when conducting research in large longitudinal samples (i.e. with live participants), where the most relevant tissue (brain) is not available. Previous research has demonstrated tissue specificity in DNAm patterns[51], limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from studies performed in blood. However, comparison of DNAm from blood and brain samples is possible in reference datasets. For example, for the CpG site cg16459265, although DNAm in blood samples is lower and shows more variation than in brain tissue, DNAm in blood is strongly correlated with DNAm in matched samples of prefrontal cortex, entorhinal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, and cerebellum[52]. Nevertheless, for an epigenetic factor to have utility as a biomarker or to facilitate early intervention, it must be detectable in peripheral samples. Secondly, despite the size and high longitudinal retention of the ARIES subsample (n~1000), numbers in the current analyses were reduced by the availability of both biological and phenotypic data. Previous research in ALSPAC has demonstrated non-random attrition, whereby participants with higher polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia were less likely to complete questionnaires and attend data collection sessions[53], which may have reduced the power to detect factors associated with psychosis-related phenotypes in this study. Thirdly, it is difficult to identify the biological plausibility of these results, especially given the small differences detected which may represent technical artefacts rather than variation attributable to differences in PEs. However, given the focus here on pre-clinical symptoms of a complex psychiatric phenotype, it is to be expected that relatively small differences in DNAm would be observed, likely reflecting many genes of small effect. In addition, the scale of genome-wide epigenetic profiling techniques means that stringent multiple testing correction is required when interpreting the results. In this study, no CpG site in the EWAS analyses reached Bonferroni-corrected levels of significance. However, we were able to replicate one association (cg16459265) in an independent sample and observed effects in related gene sets such as PTPRN2 and HLA-DPB2 in other studies. DNAm profiles across the array are not independent, and therefore adherence to strict multiple-testing thresholds, particularly in complex phenotypes, may lead to disregarding potentially interesting findings. Finally, only one of the CpG sites associated with PEs in the ALSPAC sample was replicated in the independent E-Risk sample. However, this may be due to methodological differences in the samples, such as the differences in timings between DNA sample collection and the data collection for PEs (DNA sample collection preceded the measurement of PEs in ALSPAC; in E-Risk they were collected concurrently).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that DNAm across childhood and adolescence may be associated with the emergence and continuity of PEs between the ages of 12 and 18. Previous research has identified epigenetic patterns related to clinical diagnoses of psychotic disorders[15-22], although to date very few have focussed on pre-clinical symptoms[23,24] and thus the current findings substantially extend this literature. Research uncovering early biomarkers associated with PEs is important as it may, in the future, have the potential to facilitate early identification of individuals at increased risk of a range of mental health problems, and facilitate targeting of preventive interventions. Considered together with previous research, our findings provide tentative evidence for potential methylomic changes across timepoints spanning the development of early psychotic phenomena. Supplementary Methods & Results Supplementary Tables
  51 in total

Review 1.  IRSp53/BAIAP2 in dendritic spine development, NMDA receptor regulation, and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Jaeseung Kang; Haram Park; Eunjoon Kim
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Etiological and clinical features of childhood psychotic symptoms: results from a birth cohort.

Authors:  Guilherme Polanczyk; Terrie E Moffitt; Louise Arseneault; Mary Cannon; Antony Ambler; Richard S E Keefe; Renate Houts; Candice L Odgers; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04

Review 3.  A re-review of the association between the NOTCH4 locus and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christina Shayevitz; Ori S Cohen; Stephen V Faraone; Stephen J Glatt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.568

4.  Teen-aged mothers in contemporary Britain.

Authors:  Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.982

5.  An emerging role for Wnt and GSK3 signaling pathways in schizophrenia.

Authors:  K K Singh
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Data Resource Profile: Accessible Resource for Integrated Epigenomic Studies (ARIES).

Authors:  Caroline L Relton; Tom Gaunt; Wendy McArdle; Karen Ho; Aparna Duggirala; Hashem Shihab; Geoff Woodward; Oliver Lyttleton; David M Evans; Wolf Reik; Yu-Lee Paul; Gabriella Ficz; Susan E Ozanne; Anil Wipat; Keith Flanagan; Allyson Lister; Bastiaan T Heijmans; Susan M Ring; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Comparison of different cell type correction methods for genome-scale epigenetics studies.

Authors:  Akhilesh Kaushal; Hongmei Zhang; Wilfried J J Karmaus; Meredith Ray; Mylin A Torres; Alicia K Smith; Shu-Li Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A genome-wide association study identifies two novel susceptibility loci and trans population polygenicity associated with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  M Ikeda; A Takahashi; Y Kamatani; Y Okahisa; H Kunugi; N Mori; T Sasaki; T Ohmori; Y Okamoto; H Kawasaki; S Shimodera; T Kato; H Yoneda; R Yoshimura; M Iyo; K Matsuda; M Akiyama; K Ashikawa; K Kashiwase; K Tokunaga; K Kondo; T Saito; A Shimasaki; K Kawase; T Kitajima; K Matsuo; M Itokawa; T Someya; T Inada; R Hashimoto; T Inoue; K Akiyama; H Tanii; H Arai; S Kanba; N Ozaki; I Kusumi; T Yoshikawa; M Kubo; N Iwata
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Specificity of childhood psychotic symptoms for predicting schizophrenia by 38 years of age: a birth cohort study.

Authors:  H L Fisher; A Caspi; R Poulton; M H Meier; R Houts; H Harrington; L Arseneault; T E Moffitt
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Interindividual methylomic variation across blood, cortex, and cerebellum: implications for epigenetic studies of neurological and neuropsychiatric phenotypes.

Authors:  Eilis Hannon; Katie Lunnon; Leonard Schalkwyk; Jonathan Mill
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

View more
  3 in total

1.  Methylome-wide change associated with response to electroconvulsive therapy in depressed patients.

Authors:  Lea Sirignano; Josef Frank; Laura Kranaster; Stephanie H Witt; Fabian Streit; Lea Zillich; Alexander Sartorius; Marcella Rietschel; Jerome C Foo
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Large epigenome-wide association study of childhood ADHD identifies peripheral DNA methylation associated with disease and polygenic risk burden.

Authors:  Michael A Mooney; Peter Ryabinin; Beth Wilmot; Priya Bhatt; Jonathan Mill; Joel T Nigg
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Early Detection and Prevention of Schizophrenic Psychosis-A Review.

Authors:  Martin Lennart Schulze Westhoff; Johannes Ladwig; Johannes Heck; Rasmus Schülke; Adrian Groh; Maximilian Deest; Stefan Bleich; Helge Frieling; Kirsten Jahn
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.