| Literature DB >> 30717705 |
Kebede Embaye Gezae1, Haftom Temesgen Abebe2, Letekirstos Gebreegziabher Gebretsadik2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lost to follow-up (LTFU) negatively affects the treatment success of Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART) and thus, increases Tuberculosis-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (TB/HIV) related morbidity, mortality and hospitalization. However, the incidence and predictors of loss to follow up (LTFU) among adults with TB/HIV co-infection have not yet well-investigated in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was aimed at investigating the incidence and predictors of LTFU in the study setting in particular.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Cox model; Hazard ratio; LTFU–TB/HIV
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30717705 PMCID: PMC6360725 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-3756-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Baseline socio-demographic characteristics and distribution by LTFU status of adults with TB/HIV co-infection in two governmental hospitals, Mekelle, Ethiopia, 2009–2016 (n = 305)
| Socio-demographic characteristics | LTFU ( | No-LTFU ( | Total ( | LTFU Rate [95%CI] Per 100 PYs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.3644 | ||||
| Male | 19 (42.2) | 129 (49.6) | 148 (48.5) | 3.9 [2.5, 6.1] | |
| Female | 26 (57.8) | 131 (50.4) | 157 (51.5) | 5.1 [3.5, 7.5] | |
| Age (Years) | 0.1078 | ||||
| > 35 | 14 (31.1) | 115 (44.2) | 129 (42.3) | 3.3 [1.9, 5.5] | |
| ≤ 35 | 31 (68.9) | 145 (55.8) | 176 (57.7) | 5.5 [3.9, 7.8] | |
| Marital Status | 0.3710 | ||||
| Single | 13 (28.9) | 56 (21.6) | 69 (22.6) | 6.2 [3.6, 10.7] | |
| Married | 20 (44.4) | 109 (41.9) | 129 (42.3) | 4.5 [2.9, 7.0] | |
| Othersa | 12 (26.7) | 95 (36.5) | 107 (35.1) | 3.5 [2.0, 6.1] | |
| Educational Level | 0.5581 | ||||
| No Education | 10 (22.2) | 55 (21.2) | 65 (21.3) | 4.4 [2.4, 8.1] | |
| Primary | 11 (24.4 | 79 (30.4) | 90 (29.5) | 3.8 [2.1, 6.8] | |
| Secondary | 21 (46.7) | 98 (37.7) | 119 (39.0) | 5.7 [3.7, 8.7] | |
| Tertiary | 3 (6.7) | 28 (10.8) | 31 (10.2) | 2.8 [0.9, 8.7] | |
| Religion | 0.0077 | ||||
| Orthodox | 40 (88.9) | 253 (97.3) | 293 (96.1) | 4.1 [3.0, 5.6] | |
| Muslim | 5 (11.1) | 7 (2.7) | 12(3.9) | 21.1 [8.8, 50.8] | |
| Health Institution | 0.6074 | ||||
| Ayder Hospital | 21 (46.7) | 112 (43.1) | 133(43.6) | 5.0 [3.3, 7.7] | |
| Mekelle Hospital | 24 (52.3) | 148 (56.9) | 172(56.4) | 4.2[2.8, 6.2] | |
Othersa: Divorced/Widowed/Separated
Baseline clinical characteristics and distribution by LTFU status of adults with TB/HIV co-infection in two governmental hospitals, Mekelle, Ethiopia, 2009–2016 (n = 305)
| Baseline characteristics | LTFU ( | No-LTFU ( | Total ( | LTFU Rate [95%CI] Per 100 PYs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 0.0138 | ||||
| > 17.4 | 17 (37.8) | 131 (50.4) | 148 (48.5) | 3.0 [1.8, 4.8] | |
| < =17.4 | 28 (62.2) | 129 (49.6) | 157 (51.5) | 6.6 [4.6, 9.6] | |
| Functional Status | 0.1476 | ||||
| Working | 17 (37.8) | 124 (47.7) | 141 (46.2) | 3.2 [2.0, 5.2] | |
| Ambulatory | 19 (42.2) | 91 (35.0) | 110 (36.1) | 5.4 [3.5, 8.5] | |
| Bedridden | 9 (20.0) | 45 (17.3) | 54 (17.7) | 7.8 [3.4, 14.2] | |
| Clinical Stage | 0.1093 | ||||
| I or II | 4 (8.9) | 28 (10.8) | 32 (10.5) | 3.2 [1.2, 8.6] | |
| III | 15 (33.3) | 116 (44.6) | 131 (42.9) | 3.3 [2.0, 5.4] | |
| IV | 26 (57.8) | 116 (44.6) | 142 (46.6) | 6.3 [4.3, 9.3] | |
| CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) | 0.6213 | ||||
| > 200 | 8 (17.8) | 47 (18.1) | 55 (18.0) | 3.8 [1.9, 7.6] | |
| < =200 | 37 (82.2) | 213 (81.9) | 250 (82.0) | 4.7 [3.4, 6.5] | |
| Hemoglobin level (g/dl) | 0.0002 | ||||
| Normal (> 11.0) | 19 (42.2) | 172 (66.2) | 191 (62.6) | 2.8 [1.8, 4.3] | |
| Anemic (<=11.0) | 26 (57.8) | 88 (33.8) | 114 (37.4) | 8.5 [5.8, 12.5] | |
Fig. 1LTFU estimates of adults with TB/HIV co-infection by baseline hemoglobin level in two governmental hospitals, Mekelle, Ethiopia, 2009–2016 (n = 305)
Diagnosis and treatment characteristics and distribution by LTFU status of adults with TB/HIV co-infection in two governmental hospitals, Mekelle, Ethiopia, 2009–2016 (n = 305)
| Diagnosis and Treatment characteristics | LTFU ( | No-LTFU ( | Total ( | LTFU Rate [95%CI] Per 100 PYs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse drug events | 0.0087 | ||||
| No | 39 (86.7) | 156 (60.0) | 192 (63.0) | 6.0 [4.4, 8.4] | |
| Yes | 6 (13.3) | 104 (40.0) | 113 (37.0) | 3.3 [1.2, 4.3] | |
| History OI/s | 0.0180 | ||||
| No | 3 (6.7) | 59 (22.7) | 62 (20.3) | 1.4 [0.5, 4.5] | |
| Yes | 42 (93.3) | 201 (77.3) | 243 (79.7) | 5.3 [3.9, 7.2] | |
| TB Category | 0.0530 | ||||
| PTB | 16 (35.6) | 116 (44.6) | 132 (43.3) | 3.1 [1.9, 5.1] | |
| EPTB/Mixed | 29 (64.4) | 144 (55.4) | 173 (56.7) | 6.0 [4.2, 8.7] | |
| TB treatment completion | < 0.001 | ||||
| No | 13 (28.9) | 39 (15.0) | 52 (17.0) | 35.7 [20.7, 61.5] | |
| Yes | 32 (71.1) | 221 (85.0) | 253 (83.0) | 3.3 [2.4, 4.7] | |
| IPT | 0.0025 | ||||
| on | 1 (2.2) | 47 (18.1) | 48 (15.7) | 5.6 [4.2, 7.6] | |
| off | 44 (97.8) | 213 (81.9) | 257 (84.3) | 0.5 [0.1, 3.3] | |
| CPT | 0.9189 | ||||
| Off | 7 (15.6) | 44 (16.9) | 51 (16.7) | 4.7 [2.2, 9.8] | |
| On | 38 (84.4) | 216 (83.1) | 254 (83.3) | 4.5 [3.3, 6.2] | |
OI/s opportunistic Infection/s, PTB Pulmonary Tuberculosis, EPTB Extra Pulmonary Tuberculosis, CPT Co-trimoxazole Prophylactic Therapy, IPT Isoniazid Preventive Therapy
Statistically significant predictors of LTFU among adults with TB/HIV co-infection in two governmental hospitals, Mekelle, Ethiopia, 2009–2016 (n = 305)
| Variables | CHR ([95% CI) | AHR [95% CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin | |||
| > 11(Normal) | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| ≤ 11(Anemic) | 2.928 [1.617, 5.304] | 2.660 [1.459, 4.848] | 0.001 |
| Adverse drug events | |||
| No | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| Yes | 0.390 [0.188, 0.811] | 0.451[0.216, 0.941] | 0.034 |
| History of OI | |||
| No | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| Yes | 3.720 [1.153, 12.008] | 3.795 [1.165, 12.364] | 0.027 |
| TB Treatment Completion | |||
| No | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| Yes | 0.121 [0.060, 0.244] | 0.121[0.057, 0.254] | < 0.001 |
| IPT | |||
| Off | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| On | 0.089 [0.012, 0.645] | 0.085 [0.012, 0.628] | 0.016 |
1.000: Reference Category: CHR Crude Hazard Ratio, AHR Adjusted Hazard Ratio, CI Confidence interval
*Significant at 5% level of significance,**significant at 0.1% level of significance (α)