Andrés M Bur1, Matthew Shew1, Jacob New2. 1. 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA. 2. 2 School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a state of the art review of artificial intelligence (AI), including its subfields of machine learning and natural language processing, as it applies to otolaryngology and to discuss current applications, future impact, and limitations of these technologies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Medline search engines. REVIEW METHODS: A structured search of the current literature was performed (up to and including September 2018). Search terms related to topics of AI in otolaryngology were identified and queried to identify relevant articles. CONCLUSIONS: AI is at the forefront of conversation in academic research and popular culture. In recent years, it has been touted for its potential to revolutionize health care delivery. Yet, to date, it has made few contributions to actual medical practice or patient care. Future adoption of AI technologies in otolaryngology practice may be hindered by misconceptions of what AI is and a fear that machine errors may compromise patient care. However, with potential clinical and economic benefits, it is vital for otolaryngologists to understand the principles and scope of AI. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In the coming years, AI is likely to have a major impact on biomedical research and the practice of medicine. Otolaryngologists are key stakeholders in the development and clinical integration of meaningful AI technologies that will improve patient care. High-quality data collection is essential for the development of AI technologies, and otolaryngologists should seek opportunities to collaborate with data scientists to guide them toward the most impactful clinical questions.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a state of the art review of artificial intelligence (AI), including its subfields of machine learning and natural language processing, as it applies to otolaryngology and to discuss current applications, future impact, and limitations of these technologies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Medline search engines. REVIEW METHODS: A structured search of the current literature was performed (up to and including September 2018). Search terms related to topics of AI in otolaryngology were identified and queried to identify relevant articles. CONCLUSIONS: AI is at the forefront of conversation in academic research and popular culture. In recent years, it has been touted for its potential to revolutionize health care delivery. Yet, to date, it has made few contributions to actual medical practice or patient care. Future adoption of AI technologies in otolaryngology practice may be hindered by misconceptions of what AI is and a fear that machine errors may compromise patient care. However, with potential clinical and economic benefits, it is vital for otolaryngologists to understand the principles and scope of AI. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In the coming years, AI is likely to have a major impact on biomedical research and the practice of medicine. Otolaryngologists are key stakeholders in the development and clinical integration of meaningful AI technologies that will improve patient care. High-quality data collection is essential for the development of AI technologies, and otolaryngologists should seek opportunities to collaborate with data scientists to guide them toward the most impactful clinical questions.
Entities:
Keywords:
artificial intelligence; machine learning; natural language processing; otolaryngology practice
Authors: Christopher W Noel; Rinku Sutradhar; Lesley Gotlib Conn; David Forner; Wing C Chan; Rui Fu; Julie Hallet; Natalie G Coburn; Antoine Eskander Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 8.961
Authors: Blake S Wilson; Debara L Tucci; David A Moses; Edward F Chang; Nancy M Young; Fan-Gang Zeng; Nicholas A Lesica; Andrés M Bur; Hannah Kavookjian; Caroline Mussatto; Joseph Penn; Sara Goodwin; Shannon Kraft; Guanghui Wang; Jonathan M Cohen; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Geraldine Dawson; Howard W Francis Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2022-04-20