| Literature DB >> 30717474 |
Meng Li1, Jing Wu2, Haiping Su3, Yan Tu4, Yazhuo Shang5, Yifan He6, Honglai Liu7.
Abstract
In this work, three different aqueous solutions containingEntities:
Keywords: enzyme immobilization; gold particles; horseradish peroxidase (HRP); hydrogen peroxide sensor; ionic liquids (ILs); polypyrrole (PPy)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30717474 PMCID: PMC6387225 DOI: 10.3390/s19030640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1FTIR spectra of samples prepared in (a) water, (b) [C2mim]Br, (c) [C6mim]Br and (d) [C12mim]Br aqueous solutions. (The concentration of ILs are all 1 M)
Figure 2SEM images of species prepared by pyrrole polymerization in (A) water, (B) [C2mim]Br, (C) [C6mim]Br and (D) [C12mim]Br aqueous solutions.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammograms of the modified electrodes in 0.01 M PBS containing 5 mM Fe[(CN)6]3−/4− and 0.1 M KCl (pH 7.0) (a) bare GCE; (b) PPy/GCE; (c) C2-PPy/GCE; (d) C6-PPy/GCE and (e) C12-PPy/GCE.
Figure 4Comparison of DPV response of bare GCE and modified GCE (A) PPy/GCE; (B) C2-PPy/GCE; (C) C6-PPy/GCE and (D) C12-PPy/GCE in 0.01 M PBS containing 5 mM Fe[(CN)6]3−/4− and 0.1 M KCl (pH 7.0).
Scheme 1The effect of alkyl chain length of ILs on the properties of the IL-PPy films formed on GCE.
Figure 5(A) SEM image of C12-PPy-Au composites and (B) the corresponding magnified SEM image, (C) EDS of C12-PPy-Au composites.
Figure 6DPV current responses of stepwise modified GCE (a) bare GCE, (b) C12-PPy/GCE, (c) C12-PPy-Au/GCE and (d) C12-PPy-Au-HRP/GCE in 0.01 M PBS containing 5 mM Fe[(CN)6]3−/4− and 0.1 M KCl (pH 7.0).
Figure 7EIS responses of stepwise modified GCE (a) bare GCE, (b) C12-PPy/GCE, (c) C12-PPy-Au-HRP/GCE in 0.01 M PBS containing 5 mM Fe[(CN)6]3−/4− and 0.1 M KCl (pH 7.0).
Figure 8(A) Cyclic voltammograms of bare GCE (a), HRP/GCE (b), C12-PPy-Au-HRP/GCE in the presence of 100 μM H2O2 (c) and absence of H2O2 (d) in 0.01 M PBS (pH = 7.0). (B) Cyclic voltammograms of C12-PPy-Au-HRP/GCE in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0) containing different concentrations of H2O2, (a–f): 0–500 μM H2O2. Scan rate: 50 mV·s−1.
Figure 9Optimization for operating potential (A), pH (B) and amount of HRP immobilized on electrode (C).
Figure 10(A) Amperometric response curves of C12-PPy-Au/GCE for successive additions of different concentrations of H2O2 in stirring PBS (pH 7.0) at the operating potential of −0.3 V. The inset shows the amperometric response at time range from 0 s to 225 s. (B) Linear plot of the current versus the concentrations of H2O2.
Comparison of detecting performance of C12-PPy-Au-HRP/GCE biosensor with that of some other HRP-based H2O2 sensors.
| Different H2O2 Sensors | Linear Range (μM) | LOD (μM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRP–SiO2–modified Au electrode | 20–200 | 3 | [ |
| HRP in nano-Au/carbon ceramic electrode | 12.2–1100 | 6.1 | [ |
| HRP/CeO2/chitosan/GCE | 1–150 | 0.26 | [ |
| Chitosan–CNTs1–NB2–HRP | 1–240 | 0.1 | [ |
| HRP/MSHS3/Nafion/GCE | 0.39–140 | 0.12 | [ |
| C12-PPy-Au-HRP/GCE | 2–420 | 0.25 | This work |
1 Carbon nanotubes; 2 Nile blue; 3 Mesoporous silica hollow spheres
Figure 11(A) Amperometric responses of C12-PPy-Au/GCE biosensor upon successive additions of 0.1 mM H2O2, 1 mM ascorbic acid (AA), 1 mM glucose 1mM uric acid (UA) and 1 mM aspartic acid (Asp) in stirring PBS (pH 7.0) at the operating potential of −0.3 V. (B) Stability of C12-PPy-Au/GCE toward 0.1 mM H2O2 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) at −0.3 V in 10 days (n = 3).