| Literature DB >> 30717396 |
Yeojun Yun1, Yoosoo Chang2,3,4, Han-Na Kim5,6, Seungho Ryu7,8,9, Min-Jung Kwon10,11, Yong Kyun Cho12, Hyung-Lae Kim13, Hae Suk Cheong14, Eun-Jeong Joo15.
Abstract
The changes in the gut microbiota of healthy hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers, including asymptomatic and non-cirrhotic subjects, have been rarely scrutinized. From 1463 faecal samples in health examinees, in total 112 subjects, including 36 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and 76 control subjects, were included. Twenty-eight of 36 HBsAg-positive individuals (78%) showed normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (normal ALT group), whereas eight subjects exhibited elevated ALT levels (22%, high ALT group). By using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the distance between normal and high ALT groups among HBsAg-positive subjects showed a significant separation after the pairwise comparison of weighted UniFrac distance (permutational analysis of variance q-value = 0.039), when compared with the distances to the control group. In comparison with the control group, the normal ALT group had Anaerostipes as a significant taxon that showed a positive association (Coefficient (Coef.) = 0.028, q = 0.039). Desulfovibrio (Coef. = 0.54, q = 0.014) and Megasphaera (Coef. = 1.41, q = 0.030) showed positive correlations, and Acidaminococcus (Coef. = -1.31, q = 4.15 × 10-75) exhibited a negative correlation with high ALT level. Gut microbial composition was different according to HBV-induced serum ALT levels, indicative of a potential link between gut and liver metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Megasphaera; gut microbiome; hepatitis B virus
Year: 2019 PMID: 30717396 PMCID: PMC6407135 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Flow chart of the study subjects. ALT: alanine aminotransferase; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen.
Characteristics of the studied groups.
| Demographic Characteristics | HBsAg-Negative Control ( | HBsAg-Positive Normal ALT ( | HBsAg-Positive High ALT ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (number) | 53 (70%) | 17 (37%) | 8 (100%) | 0.103 |
| Age (years) | 45.07 ± 6.74 | 45.82 ± 7.03 | 49.00 ±4.28 | 0.460 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.44 ± 3.01 | 23.99 ± 2.72 | 26.89 ± 2.68 | 0.007 |
| Fat percent (%) | 24.41 ± 5.93 | 26.86 ± 6.43 | 26.24 ± 5.65 | 0.174 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 110.39 ± 13.41 | 109.21 ± 13.46 | 117.50 ± 15.51 | 0.308 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 72.03 ± 10.61 | 71.36 ± 10.76 | 73.88 ± 10.52 | 0.839 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 94.99 ± 8.73 | 91.57 ± 7.14 | 94.13 ± 8.17 | 0.184 |
| Total-C (mg/dL) | 204.28 ± 36.69 | 191.54 ± 38.05 | 202.13 ± 40.83 | 0.306 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 55.41 ± 15.00 | 55.18 ± 11.89 | 64.63 ± 12.86 | 0.207 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 128.25 ± 32.70 | 114.79 ± 33.01 | 121.63 ± 35.21 | 0.181 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 128.76 ± 75.03 | 115.46 ± 70.44 | 86.25 ± 28.97 | 0.241 |
| Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.83 ± 0.43 | 0.83 ± 0.36 | 0.86 ± 0.21 | 0.982 |
| AST (IU/L) | 23.39 ± 15.42 | 21.86 ± 7.19 | 39.25 ± 8.84 | 0.005 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 25.61 ± 26.21 | 20.36 ± 7.94 | 51.88 ± 17.07 | 0.003 |
| WBC (×103/mm3) | 5.93 ± 1.54 | 5.52 ± 1.19 | 5.11 ± 0.96 | 0.181 |
| Platelet (×103/mm3) | 250.09 ± 47.86 | 222.86 ± 45.37 | 182.38 ± 44.76 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.35 ± 0.80 | 1.28 ± 0.54 | 1.96 ± 0.67 | 0.066 |
| Fatty liver b (%) | 39 (30/76) | 18 (5/28) | 25 (2/8) | 0.102 |
The values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or frequency. BMI: body mass index, BP: blood pressure, HDL: high density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, WBC: white blood cell, HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. a p-value for difference between groups from Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and X2 test for categorical variables. b Fatty liver was diagnosed with ultrasonography.
Figure 2Comparison of Pielou’s Evenness across sample groups. Control versus normal ALT (p = 0.238, q = 0.238), control versus high ALT (p = 0.152, q = 0.228), normal ALT versus high ALT (p = 0.036, q = 0.109). The values of q were calculated with Benjamini–Hochberg correction (FDR).
Figure 3Comparison of beta-diversity between sample groups. (A) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots according to weighted UniFrac. Control: blue, normal ALT: green, high ALT: red. (B) Comparison of weighted UniFrac distant matrices between each group. Normal ALT distance to high ALT was significant (q = 0.039). The values of q were calculated by Benjamini–Hochberg correction (FDR).
Figure 4Significant associations between three groups and microbial taxa, Anaerostipes (A), Acidaminococcus (B), Desulfovibrio (C), and Megasphaera (D). The coefficient (Coef.) and q value were shown in each plot. The values of q were determined with MaAsLin analysis.