Literature DB >> 30716528

Home use of a compact, 12‑lead ECG recording system for newborns.

Henry J Lin1, Yueh-Tze Lan2, Michael J Silka3, Nancy J Halnon4, Eva Villa-Lopez5, Nataly Arenas5, Fabian Escobedo5, Ryan Montoya5, Sarah Valdez5, Omid Rajabi Shishvan6, Sandra Sedano5, Emily H Marr5, Marie Lauzon7, A S Moosa8, Kimberly J Ko9, Elaine C Shoji10, Alexandra M Clark11, Lynne M Smith12, John Michael Criley13, Wayne W Grody14, Yii-Der Ida Chen15, Kent D Taylor16, Xiuqing Guo16, Tolga Soyata6, Jerome I Rotter17, Tingchou Chien18, Pai Chou18, Ruey-Kang Chang19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An easy-to-operate ECG recorder should be useful for newborn screening for heart conditions, by health care workers - or parents. We developed a one-piece electrode strip and a compact, 12‑lead ECG recorder for newborns.
METHOD: We enrolled 2582 newborns in a trial to assess abilities of parents to record a 12‑lead ECG on their infants (2-4 weeks-old). Newborns were randomized to recordings by parents (1290) or our staff (1292 controls). Educational backgrounds of parents varied, including 64% with no more than a high school diploma.
RESULTS: For newborns randomized to parent recorded ECGs, 94% of parents completed a 10-minute recording. However, 42.6% asked for verbal help, and 12.7% needed physical help. ECG quality was the same for recordings by parents versus staff.
CONCLUSIONS: By use of a one-piece electrode strip and a compact recorder, 87% of parents recorded diagnostic quality ECGs on their newborn infants, with minimal assistance.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECG electrodes; ECG recorder; Newborn screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30716528      PMCID: PMC6458066          DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.01.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  11 in total

1.  Centennial of the string galvanometer and the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  C Fisch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Development in clinical electrocardiography since Einthoven.

Authors:  G E BURCH
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  ELECTRODE JELLY IN ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY.

Authors:  D LEWES
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1965-01

4.  Self-retaining electrocardiographic electrode.

Authors:  W WELSH
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1951-11-10

Review 5.  Eyewitness to history: Landmarks in the development of computerized electrocardiography.

Authors:  Pentti M Rautaharju
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Novel dry electrodes for ECG monitoring.

Authors:  Anna Gruetzmann; Stefan Hansen; Jörg Müller
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  The history, science, and innovation of Holter technology.

Authors:  Harold L Kennedy
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Einthoven's string galvanometer: the first electrocardiograph.

Authors:  Moises Rivera-Ruiz; Christian Cajavilca; Joseph Varon
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

9.  ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH ELECTROLYTES.

Authors:  G H Bell; J A Knox; A J Small
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1939-07

10.  Portable ECG machine.

Authors:  Albert Chan
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.227

View more
  1 in total

1.  A multiancestry genome-wide association study of unexplained chronic ALT elevation as a proxy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with histological and radiological validation.

Authors:  Marijana Vujkovic; Shweta Ramdas; Daniel J Rader; Benjamin F Voight; Kyong-Mi Chang; Kim M Lorenz; Xiuqing Guo; Rebecca Darlay; Heather J Cordell; Jing He; Yevgeniy Gindin; Chuhan Chung; Robert P Myers; Carolin V Schneider; Joseph Park; Kyung Min Lee; Marina Serper; Rotonya M Carr; David E Kaplan; Mary E Haas; Matthew T MacLean; Walter R Witschey; Xiang Zhu; Catherine Tcheandjieu; Rachel L Kember; Henry R Kranzler; Anurag Verma; Ayush Giri; Derek M Klarin; Yan V Sun; Jie Huang; Jennifer E Huffman; Kate Townsend Creasy; Nicholas J Hand; Ching-Ti Liu; Michelle T Long; Jie Yao; Matthew Budoff; Jingyi Tan; Xiaohui Li; Henry J Lin; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Kent D Taylor; Ruey-Kang Chang; Ronald M Krauss; Silvia Vilarinho; Joseph Brancale; Jonas B Nielsen; Adam E Locke; Marcus B Jones; Niek Verweij; Aris Baras; K Rajender Reddy; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Arun J Sanyal; Naga Chalasani; Kathleen A Ryan; Braxton D Mitchell; Dipender Gill; Andrew D Wells; Elisabetta Manduchi; Yedidya Saiman; Nadim Mahmud; Donald R Miller; Peter D Reaven; Lawrence S Phillips; Sumitra Muralidhar; Scott L DuVall; Jennifer S Lee; Themistocles L Assimes; Saiju Pyarajan; Kelly Cho; Todd L Edwards; Scott M Damrauer; Peter W Wilson; J Michael Gaziano; Christopher J O'Donnell; Amit V Khera; Struan F A Grant; Christopher D Brown; Philip S Tsao; Danish Saleheen; Luca A Lotta; Lisa Bastarache; Quentin M Anstee; Ann K Daly; James B Meigs; Jerome I Rotter; Julie A Lynch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 41.307

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.