Literature DB >> 30716514

Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region.

Emily J Rugel1, Richard M Carpiano2, Sarah B Henderson3, Michael Brauer4.   

Abstract

In a rapidly urbanizing world, identifying evidence-based strategies to support healthy design is essential. Although urban living offers increased access to critical resources and can help to mitigate climate change, densely populated neighborhood environments are often higher in many of the physical and psychological stressors that are detrimental to health, and lower in the social capital that is beneficial to health. One component of urban form that can reduce these stressors and improve social capital is nature: greenspace, such as parks and street trees, and bluespace, such as rivers and oceans. In this project, we applied measures from a Natural Space Index previously developed for the Vancouver, Canada census metropolitan area to explore the relationship between distinct measures of natural space and prevalence of (1) major depressive disorder, (2) negative mental health, and (3) psychological distress. In addition, we examined direct associations between natural space exposure and neighborhood social capital, as measured via self-reported sense of community belonging (SoC), as well as the potential mental health benefits of natural space mediated via SoC. Using data from the population-based, cross-sectional 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health (weighted n = 1,930,048), we found no direct associations between any measure of natural space and mental health in models adjusted for 11 demographic, socioeconomic, household arrangement, health, and urban design variables. However, publicly accessible neighborhood nature was associated with increased odds of higher SoC. A 1% increase in the percentage of natural space (combined greenspace and bluespace) within 500 m had an odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 1.05 [1.00, 1.10] for very strong vs. very weak SoC and 1.04 [1.01, 1.08] for somewhat strong vs. very weak SoC. In addition, higher levels of SoC were associated with improvements in all three mental health outcomes. Mediation tests indicated significant indirect effects of both publicly accessible neighborhood nature variables on reductions in psychological distress and reduced odds of negative mental health via increased sense of SoC. This suggests that natural space has the potential to address the pressing issue of social isolation and, in turn, poor mental health faced by residents of dense urban environments.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Natural space; Population mental health; Population survey; Social cohesion; Urban planning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30716514     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  16 in total

1.  Relationship between sense of community belonging and self-rated health across life stages.

Authors:  Camilla A Michalski; Lori M Diemert; John F Helliwell; Vivek Goel; Laura C Rosella
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2020-10-12

2.  Understanding the Differential Impact of Vegetation Measures on Modeling the Association between Vegetation and Psychotic and Non-Psychotic Disorders in Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Abu Yousuf Md Abdullah; Jane Law; Zahid A Butt; Christopher M Perlman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A Systematic Review of Studies Describing the Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Potential Harms of Place-Based Interventions to Address Loneliness and Mental Health Problems.

Authors:  Yung-Chia Hsueh; Rachel Batchelor; Margaux Liebmann; Ashley Dhanani; Laura Vaughan; Anne-Kathrin Fett; Farhana Mann; Alexandra Pitman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Spatiotemporal Contextual Uncertainties in Green Space Exposure Measures: Exploring a Time Series of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Indices.

Authors:  Marco Helbich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Greening Blocks: A Conceptual Typology of Practical Design Interventions to Integrate Health and Climate Resilience Co-Benefits.

Authors:  Sara Barron; Sophie Nitoslawski; Kathleen L Wolf; Angie Woo; Erin Desautels; Stephen R J Sheppard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Positive Influences of Social Support on Sense of Community, Life Satisfaction and the Health of Immigrants in Spain.

Authors:  Isabel Hombrados-Mendieta; Mario Millán-Franco; Luis Gómez-Jacinto; Felipe Gonzalez-Castro; María José Martos-Méndez; Alba García-Cid
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-15

7.  Associations between Community Cohesion and Subjective Wellbeing of the Elderly in Guangzhou, China-A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Structural Equation Model.

Authors:  Shulin Lai; Yuquan Zhou; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Multiple dimensions of stress vs. genetic effects on depression.

Authors:  Mark D Kvarta; Heather A Bruce; Joshua Chiappelli; Stephanie M Hare; Eric L Goldwaser; Jessica Sewell; Hemalatha Sampath; Samantha Lightner; Wyatt Marshall; Kathryn Hatch; Elizabeth Humphries; Seth Ament; Alan R Shuldiner; Braxton D Mitchell; Francis J McMahon; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Urban green space and happiness in developed countries.

Authors:  Oh-Hyun Kwon; Inho Hong; Jeasurk Yang; Donghee Y Wohn; Woo-Sung Jung; Meeyoung Cha
Journal:  EPJ Data Sci       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.184

10.  Mechanisms of Impact of Blue Spaces on Human Health: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michail Georgiou; Gordon Morison; Niamh Smith; Zoë Tieges; Sebastien Chastin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.