Yi Zhang1, Dian-Zhong Zhang2. 1. a Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University , Changsha , Hunan Province , China. 2. b Center for Teaching and Research of Advanced Mathematics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University , Changsha , Hunan Province , China.
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to examine the relationship between nut consumption and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to November 2018 for observational studies on the relationship between nut consumption and MetS. The pooled relative risk (RR) of MetS for the highest versus lowest category of nut consumption, as well as their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 11 observational studies (6 cross-sectional and 5 prospective cohort studies), which involved a total of 89,224 participants, were identified for this meta-analysis. The overall multivariable adjusted RR showed that nut consumption was negatively associated with MetS (RR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92; p < 0.001). Of interest, subgroup analysis confirmed that such findings existed in tree nuts (RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00; p = 0.04), but not in peanuts (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06; p = 0.68). Conclusions: The existing evidence suggested that nut consumption was negatively associated with MetS. However, such an inverse relationship only existed in tree nuts, not in peanuts. More well-designed studies with detailed specifications of nut varieties are needed to further elaborate the issues examined in this study.
Objective: Our aim was to examine the relationship between nut consumption and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to November 2018 for observational studies on the relationship between nut consumption and MetS. The pooled relative risk (RR) of MetS for the highest versus lowest category of nut consumption, as well as their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 11 observational studies (6 cross-sectional and 5 prospective cohort studies), which involved a total of 89,224 participants, were identified for this meta-analysis. The overall multivariable adjusted RR showed that nut consumption was negatively associated with MetS (RR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92; p < 0.001). Of interest, subgroup analysis confirmed that such findings existed in tree nuts (RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00; p = 0.04), but not in peanuts (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06; p = 0.68). Conclusions: The existing evidence suggested that nut consumption was negatively associated with MetS. However, such an inverse relationship only existed in tree nuts, not in peanuts. More well-designed studies with detailed specifications of nut varieties are needed to further elaborate the issues examined in this study.
Authors: José Francisco López-Gil; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno; Francisco J Amaro-Gahete; María Medrano; Carlos Pascual-Morena; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Arthur Eumann Mesas Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.865
Authors: Lauren E Theodore; Nicole J Kellow; Emily A McNeil; Evangeline O Close; Eliza G Coad; Barbara R Cardoso Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Alison Mary Coates; Samantha Morgillo; Catherine Yandell; Andrew Scholey; Jonathan David Buckley; Kathryn Ann Dyer; Alison Marie Hill Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Gloria Cubas-Basterrechea; Iñaki Elío; Sandra Sumalla-Cano; Silvia Aparicio-Obregón; Carolina Teresa González-Antón; Pedro Muñoz-Cacho Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-23 Impact factor: 3.390