BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry (FCM) is a simple, sensitive, and specific technique that can potentially determine DNA ploidy in B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) and is complementary to cytogenetics. METHODS: A prospective FCM DNA ploidy analysis using FxCycle™ Violet (assay sensitivity 0.01%) was done in 125 consecutive new cases of BCP-ALL (90 cases <15 years of age) and compared with corresponding cytogenetic ploidy (karyotyping and/or FISH) data wherever available. This assay was also subsequently evaluated for detection of residual aneuploid clone in few BCP-ALL cases. RESULTS: Of the total 125 BCP-ALL cases evaluated, flow ploidy analysis revealed diploidy (DI 0.96-1.05) in 44.8% (n = 56), low-hyperdiploidy (DI 1.06 to 1.15) in 13.6% (n = 17), high-hyperdiploidy (DI 1.16-1.39) in 32.8% (n = 41) and near-tetraploidy (DI ≥ 1.80) in 2.4% (n = 3) cases. The high risk sub-group of low-hypodiploidy (DI 0.70 to 0.88)/near-triploidy (DI 1.40 to 1.79) constituted 5.6% (n = 7) cases while there was only one case with haploidy (DI 0.58). Overall, high concordance of 90.4% (n = 113) was noted between the combined cytogenetics ploidy and FCM ploidy. Of the total discordant cases (n = 12), the maximum discordance was seen in the low-hyperdiploid DI subgroup (n = 10), which included seven cases with low DNA index high hyperdiploidy (LDI-HHD). FCM DNA ploidy assay was able to detect the residual clone in all six MRD positive aneuploid cases evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: FxCycle™ based DNA ploidy ascertains strong correlation with cytogenetic profiles and yields complementary information that can be used by the cytogenetics laboratories or otherwise.
BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry (FCM) is a simple, sensitive, and specific technique that can potentially determine DNA ploidy in B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) and is complementary to cytogenetics. METHODS: A prospective FCM DNA ploidy analysis using FxCycle™ Violet (assay sensitivity 0.01%) was done in 125 consecutive new cases of BCP-ALL (90 cases <15 years of age) and compared with corresponding cytogenetic ploidy (karyotyping and/or FISH) data wherever available. This assay was also subsequently evaluated for detection of residual aneuploid clone in few BCP-ALL cases. RESULTS: Of the total 125 BCP-ALL cases evaluated, flow ploidy analysis revealed diploidy (DI 0.96-1.05) in 44.8% (n = 56), low-hyperdiploidy (DI 1.06 to 1.15) in 13.6% (n = 17), high-hyperdiploidy (DI 1.16-1.39) in 32.8% (n = 41) and near-tetraploidy (DI ≥ 1.80) in 2.4% (n = 3) cases. The high risk sub-group of low-hypodiploidy (DI 0.70 to 0.88)/near-triploidy (DI 1.40 to 1.79) constituted 5.6% (n = 7) cases while there was only one case with haploidy (DI 0.58). Overall, high concordance of 90.4% (n = 113) was noted between the combined cytogenetics ploidy and FCM ploidy. Of the total discordant cases (n = 12), the maximum discordance was seen in the low-hyperdiploid DI subgroup (n = 10), which included seven cases with low DNA index high hyperdiploidy (LDI-HHD). FCM DNA ploidy assay was able to detect the residual clone in all six MRD positive aneuploid cases evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: FxCycle™ based DNA ploidy ascertains strong correlation with cytogenetic profiles and yields complementary information that can be used by the cytogenetics laboratories or otherwise.