Literature DB >> 30715750

Investigating measurements of fine particle (PM2.5 ) emissions from the cooking of meals and mitigating exposure using a cooker hood.

Catherine O'Leary1,2, Yvonne de Kluizenaar2, Piet Jacobs2, Wouter Borsboom2, Ian Hall3, Benjamin Jones1.   

Abstract

There is growing awareness that indoor exposure to particulate matter with diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5 ) is associated with an increased risk of adverse health effects. Cooking is a key indoor source of PM2.5 and an activity conducted daily in most homes. Population scale models can predict occupant exposures to PM2.5 , but these predictions are sensitive to the emission rates used. Reported emission rates are highly variable and are typically for the cooking of single ingredients and not full meals. Accordingly, there is a need to assess PM2.5 emissions from the cooking of complete meals. Mean PM2.5 emission rates and source strengths were measured for four complete meals. Temporal PM2.5 concentrations and particle size distributions were recorded using an optical particle counter (OPC), and gravimetric sampling was used to determine calibration factors. Mean emission rates and source strengths varied between 0.54-3.7 mg/min and 15-68 mg, respectively, with 95% confidence. Using a cooker hood (apparent capture efficiency > 90%) and frying in non-stick pans were found to significantly reduce emissions. OPC calibration factors varied between 1.5 and 5.0 showing that a single value cannot be used for all meals and that gravimetric sampling is necessary when measuring PM2.5 concentrations in kitchens.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  calibration factor; cooker hood; gas burner; size distribution; source strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30715750     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  3 in total

1.  Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Jiayuan Hao; Elena Austin; Jeff Shirai; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 7.093

2.  Modelling uncertainty in the relative risk of exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus by airborne aerosol transmission in well mixed indoor air.

Authors:  Benjamin Jones; Patrick Sharpe; Christopher Iddon; E Abigail Hathway; Catherine J Noakes; Shaun Fitzgerald
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.456

3.  Factors Impacting Range Hood Use in California Houses and Low-Income Apartments.

Authors:  Haoran Zhao; Wanyu R Chan; William W Delp; Hao Tang; Iain S Walker; Brett C Singer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.