Literature DB >> 30715666

Multi-step optimization of the filtration method for the isolation of Campylobacter species from stool samples.

Anne Tilmanne1,2, Helga Marisca Kandet Yattara3, Margaux Herpol3,4, Linda Vlaes3,4, Patricia Retore3,4, Caroline Quach5,6, Olivier Vandenberg4,7,8, Marie Hallin3, Delphine Martiny3,4,9.   

Abstract

The filtration method (FM) is the most effective isolation technique for Epsilobacteriaceae from stool samples. FM's different adaptations make it difficult to compare data between studies. This study was performed in three phases to optimize FM from a routine laboratory perspective. In July-September 2014 (part I), FM was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar containing 5% sheep blood and Columbia agar containing 5% sheep blood. In July 2016 (part II), FM was performed using 0.60-μm pore size polycarbonate filters (0.6-PC filter) and 0.45-μm pore size cellulose acetate filters (0.45-AC filter); in January 2018 (part III), the addition of hydrogen to incubators was studied. On 1146 stools analyzed in part I, the positive samples that showed no growth on the Butzler medium (n = 22/72, 30.6%) had improved growth of Epsilobacteriaceae when using the Columbia instead of the Mueller-Hinton medium (21/22 strains vs. 11/22, p < 0.05). In part II, on 718 stools, 91 strains grew with FM (12.7%), more with 0.6-PC filter (90/91) than with 0.45-AC filter (44/91) (p < 0.05). In part III, 578 stools were cultured, 98 Epsilobacteriaceae strains grew with FM, and 7% hydrogen finding significantly more Epsilobacteriaceae than without hydrogen (90/98, 91.8%, vs. 72/98, 73.5%; p < 0.05). The use of a Columbia medium containing 5% sheep blood with 0.6-PC filters incubated at 37 °C in a 7% hydrogen-enriched atmosphere led to an almost fourfold increase in the isolation rate of Epsilobacteriaceae among the studied combinations. Reference centers for Campylobacter should use standardized protocols to enable the comparison of prevalence in space and time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; Concisus; Filter; Filtration method; Gastroenteritis; Hydrogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30715666     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03479-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  23 in total

1.  Efficient isolation of campylobacteria from stools.

Authors:  A J Lastovica; E le Roux
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of basal broth media for the optimal laboratory recovery of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  J E Moore
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Accuracy of the API Campy system, the Vitek 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus card and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the identification of Campylobacter and related organisms.

Authors:  D Martiny; A Dediste; L Debruyne; L Vlaes; N B Haddou; P Vandamme; O Vandenberg
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Prevalence of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter, and Sutterella spp. in human fecal samples as estimated by a reevaluation of isolation methods for Campylobacters.

Authors:  J Engberg; S L On; C S Harrington; P Gerner-Smidt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A method for the growth and recovery of 17 species of Campylobacter and its subsequent application to inoculated beef.

Authors:  O A Lynch; C Cagney; D A McDowell; G Duffy
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Comparison of polycarbonate and cellulose acetate membrane filters for isolation of Campylobacter concisus from stool samples.

Authors:  Hans Linde Nielsen; Jørgen Engberg; Tove Ejlertsen; Henrik Nielsen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 7.  The clinical importance of emerging Campylobacter species.

Authors:  Si Ming Man
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Use of cellulose filters to isolate Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated retail broiler meat.

Authors:  Leslie Speegle; Michael E Miller; Steffen Backert; Omar A Oyarzabal
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 9.  Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity.

Authors:  J-P Butzler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  Arcobacter species in humans.

Authors:  Olivier Vandenberg; Anne Dediste; Kurt Houf; Sandra Ibekwem; Hichem Souayah; Sammy Cadranel; Nicole Douat; G Zissis; J-P Butzler; P Vandamme
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of a novel and specialized cultivation method for isolating Helicobacter pullorum from chicken meat.

Authors:  H Akhlaghi; S H Emadi Chashmi; A Jebelli Javan
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.376

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.