K Giannakopoulos1, I El-Battrawy1,2, T Gietzen1, U Ansari1, M Borggrefe1,2, I Akin1,2. 1. First Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. 2. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site, Heidelberg-Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS) is an acute reversible left ventricular dysfunction. Recently published studies have highlighted a similar mortality rate as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We compared the impact of gender differences on the outcome of TTS patients as compared to ACS patient. DESIGN AND METHODS: We included a collective of 138 patients TTS between 2003 and 2016 at our institution. Patients were divided according to their gender into two groups (Males n=21, 15% and females, n=117, 85%). They were compared with a cohort of 300 patients with a diagnosis of ACS. RESULTS: On the acute phase, in male patients with TTS, a treatment with inotropic was more often required (33.3 vs. 11.5%, P<0.01), were more susceptible to cardiogenic shock (28.6 vs. 12.5%, P<0.04). Concerning the long-term prognosis after the acute event, male patients had higher all-cause mortality over long-term follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the mortality of male patients with TTS was significantly higher compared to male patients with ACS (log-rank <0.01), while there was no significant difference between female patients with TTS and ACS (log-rank =0.60, P=0.45). In a multivariate cox regression analysis, male gender (HR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, P=0.02) GFR <60 ml/min (HR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.0, P=0.01) and history of cancer (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.3, P<0.01) were independent predictors of 5-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable evidence suggests that TTS compared to ACS implicates more significant clinical short-term events on male patients and it may be associated with poorer long-term prognosis.
BACKGROUND:Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS) is an acute reversible left ventricular dysfunction. Recently published studies have highlighted a similar mortality rate as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We compared the impact of gender differences on the outcome of TTS patients as compared to ACS patient. DESIGN AND METHODS: We included a collective of 138 patients TTS between 2003 and 2016 at our institution. Patients were divided according to their gender into two groups (Males n=21, 15% and females, n=117, 85%). They were compared with a cohort of 300 patients with a diagnosis of ACS. RESULTS: On the acute phase, in male patients with TTS, a treatment with inotropic was more often required (33.3 vs. 11.5%, P<0.01), were more susceptible to cardiogenic shock (28.6 vs. 12.5%, P<0.04). Concerning the long-term prognosis after the acute event, male patients had higher all-cause mortality over long-term follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the mortality of male patients with TTS was significantly higher compared to male patients with ACS (log-rank <0.01), while there was no significant difference between female patients with TTS and ACS (log-rank =0.60, P=0.45). In a multivariate cox regression analysis, male gender (HR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, P=0.02) GFR <60 ml/min (HR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.0, P=0.01) and history of cancer (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.3, P<0.01) were independent predictors of 5-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable evidence suggests that TTS compared to ACS implicates more significant clinical short-term events on male patients and it may be associated with poorer long-term prognosis.