Literature DB >> 30715444

Virtual Reality Angiogram vs 3-Dimensional Printed Angiogram as an Educational tool-A Comparative Study.

David Bairamian1, Shinuo Liu1,2, Behzad Eftekhar1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the neurovascular structures has helped preoperative surgical planning. 3D printed models and virtual reality (VR) devices are 2 options to improve 3D stereovision and stereoscopic depth perception of cerebrovascular anatomy for aneurysm surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the practicality and potential of 3D printed and VR models in a neurosurgical education context.
METHODS: The VR angiogram was introduced through the development and testing of a VR smartphone app. Ten neurosurgical trainees from Australia and New Zealand participated in a 2-part interactive exercise using 3 3D printed and VR angiogram models followed by a questionnaire about their experience. In a separate exercise to investigate the learning curve effect on VR angiogram application, a qualified neurosurgeon was subjected to 15 exercises involving manipulating VR angiograms models.
RESULTS: VR angiogram outperformed 3D printed model in terms of resolution. It had statistically significant advantage in ability to zoom, resolution, ease of manipulation, model durability, and educational potential. VR angiogram had a higher questionnaire total score than 3D models. The 3D printed models had a statistically significant advantage in depth perception and ease of manipulation. The results were independent of trainee year level, sequence of the tests, or anatomy.
CONCLUSION: In selected cases with challenging cerebrovascular anatomy where stereoscopic depth perception is helpful, VR angiogram should be considered as a viable alternative to the 3D printed models for neurosurgical training and preoperative planning. An immersive virtual environment offers excellent resolution and ability to zoom, potentiating it as an untapped educational tool.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Angiogram; Cerebral aneurysm; Neurosurgical education; Smartphone app; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30715444     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Virtual Reality Assisted Cardiac Catheterization.

Authors:  Patric Bettati; James D Dormer; Jeff Young; Maysam Shahedi; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 2.  Digital tools in neurosurgical pathways: considerations for the future.

Authors:  Alexander J Deighton; Karanjot Chhatwal; Debashish Das
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2022-03

3.  Removal of a foreign body by rigid bronchoscope after virtual reality-aided presurgical planning: A case report.

Authors:  Atsushi Torii; Hideo Saka; Tod Clapp; Chad Eitel; Chisato Honjo; Masaki Anzai; Masahide Oki
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  3D-Printed Disease Models for Neurosurgical Planning, Simulation, and Training.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 5.  Simulation for skills training in neurosurgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of progressive scholarly acceptance.

Authors:  Joseph Davids; Susruta Manivannan; Ara Darzi; Stamatia Giannarou; Hutan Ashrafian; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Does stereoscopic imaging improve the memorization of medical imaging by neurosurgeons? Experience of a single institution.

Authors:  Nicolas Schlinkmann; Rutvik Khakhar; Thomas Picht; Sophie K Piper; Lucius S Fekonja; Peter Vajkoczy; Gueliz Acker
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.042

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.