| Literature DB >> 30715054 |
Sun-Woo Yuk1, In-Ho Hwang2, Hyeon-Rae Cho3, Sang-Geon Park4.
Abstract
The form of the collection of bio-signals is becoming increasingly integrated and smart to meet the demands of the age of smart healthcare and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In addition, the movement patterns of human muscles are also becoming more complex due to diversification of the human living environment. An analysis of the movement patterns of normal people's muscles contracting with age and that of patients who are being treated in a hospital, including the disabled, will help improve life patterns, medical treatment patterns, and quality of life. In this study, the researchers developed a smart electromyogram (EMG) sensor which can improve human life patterns through EMG range and pattern recognition, which is beyond the conventional simple EMG measurement level. The developed sensor has a high gain of 10,000 times or more, noise of 500 uVrms or less, and common mode rejection ratio (CMRR) of 100 dB or more for EMG level and pattern recognition. The pattern recognition time of the sensor is 30 s. All the circuits developed in this study have a phase margin of 75 degrees or more for stability. Standard 0.25 μm complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology was used for the integrated circuit design. The system error rate was confirmed to be 1% or less through a clinical trial conducted on five males in their 40s and three females in their 30s for the past two years. The muscle activities of all subjects of the clinical trial were improved by about 21% by changing their life patterns based on EMG pattern recognition.Entities:
Keywords: CMOS technology; CMRR; bio-signal; electromyogram; phase margin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30715054 PMCID: PMC6266180 DOI: 10.3390/mi9110555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure A1Block diagram of the smart electromyogram (EMG) sensor.
Figure A2Schematic of core-amplifier.
Performance characteristics of core-amplifier.
| Parameter | Existing Product (Ottobock) | Value (Manufactured EMG Sensor) |
|---|---|---|
|
| By feedback resistance | 10 mV/fC |
|
| 477 uVrms | 500 uVrms |
|
| 5 V | 2.8 V |
|
| 10 kHz | 200 MHz |
|
| 10 fC | 4 fC |
|
| 0.3% S.d | 0.3% S.d |
|
| About 2 mW | 2 mW |
|
| N/A | 0.25 μm |
Dimensions of the Core-Amplifier.
| Device | Z/L | Device | Z/L | Device | Z/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 60/20 |
| 50/10 |
| 120/75 |
|
| 350/20 |
| 120/10 |
| 120/75 |
|
| 300/20 |
| 120/10 |
| 60/20 |
|
| 50/10 |
| 10/10 | - | - |
Figure A3Noise gain response of core-Amplifier.
Figure A4Output voltage gain and frequency band of the instrumentation amplifier (INA) stage of the core-amplifier.
Figure A5Measured raw EMG signal and fast Fourier transform (FFT) signal.
Figure A6Notch filter stage of the EMG sensor and the measured frequency of the final output stage.
Figure A7Total noise versus amplification time.
Figure A8System error rate for temperature rise.
System error rate for phase margin and phase signal.
| Phase Margin | Phase of Signal | Noise | % Error Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45° | 0.134 ms | 145 uVrms | 0.23% |
| 50° | 0.145 ms | 195 uVrms | 0.43% |
| 55° | 0.168 ms | 286 uVrms | 0.75% |
| 60° | 0.198 ms | 369 uVrms | 0.98% |
| 65° | 0.226 ms | 469 uVrms | 1.08% |
Reliability verification through robust statistics.
| Parameter | Gain | Noise | System Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Avg | 9.8 mV/fC | 487 uVrms | 1.11% |
| Median | 9.9 mV/fC | 502 uVrms | 1.03% |
| Z-score | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
Clinical Trial Procedures.
| 1. The EMG signal is measured for the upper limb cutter. |
| 2. Research participants should change to the same lab uniform. To measure the EMG of the upper extremity muscles, use the EMG sensor where the upper extremity moves most strongly. In addition, the other hand is grounded to obtain accurate experimental measurement data. Do not collect signals whose signal levels are shaken or whose thresholds are not exceeded [ |
| 3. All experimental data use only data values that meet 95% confidence with robust statistical processing techniques. |
| 4. Experimental method |
Figure A9Improvement of muscle movement activity with EMG sensor.
Figure A10Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photo of semiconductor wafer and some patterns.