J M A Wijnands1, F Zhu1, E Kingwell1, Y Zhao1, C Evans2, J D Fisk3, R A Marrie4, H Tremlett1. 1. Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia and The Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, BC. 2. College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK. 3. Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. 4. Departments of Internal Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The multiple sclerosis prodrome remains poorly understood. We aimed to examine the prodrome in people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis at onset (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study using clinical and linked health administrative data in two Canadian provinces. We identified people with RMS, PPMS and age- sex- and geographically-matched population controls, and compared the number of physician encounters (total number, per International Classification of Diseases chapter, and per physician speciality) in the five years before symptom onset. Negative binomial regression models were sex, age, socioeconomic status and calendar year adjusted. RESULTS: We identified 1887 RMS, 171 PPMS cases, and 9837 matched population controls. No difference existed in the total number of encounters in the five years before index between RMS and PPMS, or between the phenotypes and their respective controls. Compared to RMS cases, PPMS cases had more nervous system-related encounters (adjusted rate ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.49) and fewer encounters with dermatologists (adjusted rate ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.96). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that people with RMS and PPMS may both experience a prodrome, although aspects may differ.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The multiple sclerosis prodrome remains poorly understood. We aimed to examine the prodrome in people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis at onset (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study using clinical and linked health administrative data in two Canadian provinces. We identified people with RMS, PPMS and age- sex- and geographically-matched population controls, and compared the number of physician encounters (total number, per International Classification of Diseases chapter, and per physician speciality) in the five years before symptom onset. Negative binomial regression models were sex, age, socioeconomic status and calendar year adjusted. RESULTS: We identified 1887 RMS, 171 PPMS cases, and 9837 matched population controls. No difference existed in the total number of encounters in the five years before index between RMS and PPMS, or between the phenotypes and their respective controls. Compared to RMS cases, PPMS cases had more nervous system-related encounters (adjusted rate ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.49) and fewer encounters with dermatologists (adjusted rate ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.96). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that people with RMS and PPMS may both experience a prodrome, although aspects may differ.
Authors: Kjetil Bjornevik; Kassandra L Munger; Marianna Cortese; Christian Barro; Brian C Healy; David W Niebuhr; Ann I Scher; Jens Kuhle; Alberto Ascherio Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Nina Steinemann; Gábor Horváth; Stephanie Rodgers; Marco Kaufmann; Yanhua Xu; Christian P Kamm; Jürg Kesselring; Zina-Mary Manjaly; Chiara Zecca; Pasquale Calabrese; Milo A Puhan; Viktor von Wyl Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 4.003