Ji-Hyun Lee1, Haesun Jung1, Young-Eun Jang1, Eun-Hee Kim1, In-Kyung Song2, Hee-Soo Kim1, Jin-Tae Kim1. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation frequently occurs during facemask ventilation in children. In the present study, we compared the incidence of gastric insufflation between pressure-controlled facemask ventilation and manual facemask ventilation during general anesthesia induction in children. METHODS:Children in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (n = 76) received pressure-controlled facemask ventilation at an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. In the manual ventilation group (n = 75), facemask ventilation was manually performed by anesthesiologists, who tried to maintain an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. The adjustable pressure limiting valve was set at 13 cm H2 O. The incidence of gastric insufflation during 90 seconds after the initiation of ventilation was assessed using epigastric auscultation and gastric ultrasonography. RESULTS: The incidence of gastric insufflation was significantly higher in the manual facemask ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (48% vs 12%, respectively; odds ratio 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-17.9; P < 0.001). The mean peak airway pressure during ventilation was significantly higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (16.1 [3.0] cm H2 O vs 13.0 [0.1] cm H2 O; 95% CI of differences, 2.36-3.71 cm H2 O; P < 0.001). The manual ventilation group exhibited a wide peak airway pressure range (11-26 cm H2 O) and a wide variation of tidal volume (0-7.0 mL/kg) compared with those of the pressure-controlled ventilation group (13-14 cm H2 O and 0.6-16.0 mL/kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: At an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O, pressure-controlled ventilation may be more effective than manual ventilation in preventing gastric insufflation while providing stable ventilation in children.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Gastric insufflation frequently occurs during facemask ventilation in children. In the present study, we compared the incidence of gastric insufflation between pressure-controlled facemask ventilation and manual facemask ventilation during general anesthesia induction in children. METHODS:Children in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (n = 76) received pressure-controlled facemask ventilation at an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. In the manual ventilation group (n = 75), facemask ventilation was manually performed by anesthesiologists, who tried to maintain an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. The adjustable pressure limiting valve was set at 13 cm H2 O. The incidence of gastric insufflation during 90 seconds after the initiation of ventilation was assessed using epigastric auscultation and gastric ultrasonography. RESULTS: The incidence of gastric insufflation was significantly higher in the manual facemask ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (48% vs 12%, respectively; odds ratio 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-17.9; P < 0.001). The mean peak airway pressure during ventilation was significantly higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (16.1 [3.0] cm H2 O vs 13.0 [0.1] cm H2 O; 95% CI of differences, 2.36-3.71 cm H2 O; P < 0.001). The manual ventilation group exhibited a wide peak airway pressure range (11-26 cm H2 O) and a wide variation of tidal volume (0-7.0 mL/kg) compared with those of the pressure-controlled ventilation group (13-14 cm H2 O and 0.6-16.0 mL/kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: At an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O, pressure-controlled ventilation may be more effective than manual ventilation in preventing gastric insufflation while providing stable ventilation in children.
Authors: Jozef Klucka; Martina Kosinova; Kai Zacharowski; Stefan De Hert; Milan Kratochvil; Michaela Toukalkova; Roman Stoudek; Hana Zelinkova; Petr Stourac Journal: Eur J Anaesthesiol Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.183