| Literature DB >> 30713706 |
Sujuan Wang1, Zhang-Wen Wei1, Jianyong Zhang1, Long Jiang1, Dingxin Liu1, Ji-Jun Jiang1, Rui Si2, Cheng-Yong Su1.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks with highly ordered porosity have been studied extensively. In this paper, the effect of framework (pore) disorder on the gas sorption ofEntities:
Keywords: MOFs; T-shaped ligands; channel structures; disorder; gas separation; metal–organic frameworks; solid properties
Year: 2019 PMID: 30713706 PMCID: PMC6327186 DOI: 10.1107/S2052252518015749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IUCrJ ISSN: 2052-2525 Impact factor: 4.769
Figure 1T-shaped bridging ligands containing one azole five-membered-ring heterocycle (imidazole, 1,2,4-triazole and tetrazole) and two carboxylate groups, along with the X-ray crystal structure comparisons of the azole-based rtl-MOFs (Timi-Cu, Ttriaz-Cu and Ttetraz-Cu) showing variation of N sites along the Cu8 L 4 squares on the inner pore surface.
Figure 2X-ray crystal structures of Timi-Cu: (a) Cu2 paddle-wheel SBU, (b) Cu8 L 4 square in sql layer formed via the isophthalate moiety in a 1,2-alternate fashion (up–up down–down), (c) side view of the 1D channel formed via pillared Cu8 L 4 square-grid sql layers, (d) solvent-accessible voids in the tubular channels perpendicular to the bc plane. Framework disorder, solvated molecules and hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Figure 3Comparison of the ideally ordered framework and one possible local disordered framework of Timi-Cu in the a (upper) and b (lower) directions: (a) ordered overlapping of the Cu8 L 4 square-grid sql layers, (b) one possible disordered offsetting model of the Cu8 L 4 square-grid sql layers, (c) top view of 1D straight channel in the ordered framework formed via overlapping of Cu8 L 4 square grids and (d) top view of the 1D distorted channel in the disordered framework formed via offsetting of the Cu8 L 4 square grid.
Figure 4Disordered framework versus ordered framework for Timi-Cu.
Figure 5(a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for Timi-Cu measured at 77 K and (b) Horvath–Kawazoe micropore size distribution.
Figure 6CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for Timi-Cu measured at (a) 195 K (insert shows an enlargement of the low-pressure section); (b) 263, 273, 283 and 298 K; and (c) CO2, N2, H2 and CH4 adsorption–desorption isotherms for Timi-Cu measured at 273 K, and CO2, N2 and CH4 adsorption–desorption isotherms for (d) Timi-Cu, (e) Ttriaz-Cu and (f) Ttetraz-Cu measured under various pressures at 298 K.