Literature DB >> 30713461

Emissions from prescribed burning of timber slash piles in Oregon.

Johanna Aurell1, Brian K Gullett2, Dennis Tabor2, Nick Yonker3.   

Abstract

Emissions from burning piles of post-harvest timber slash (Douglas fir) in Grande Ronde, Oregon were sampled using an instrument platform lofted into the plume using a tether- controlled aerostat or balloon. Emissions of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon, ultraviolet absorbing PM, elemental/organic carbon, filter-based metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were sampled to determine emission factors, the amount of pollutant formed per amount of biomass burned. The effect on emissions from covering the piles with polyethylene (PE) sheets to prevent fuel wetting versus uncovered piles was also determined. Results showed that the uncovered ("wet") piles burned with lower combustion efficiency and higher emission factors for VOCs, PM2.5, PCDD/PCDF, and PAHs. Removal of the PE prior to ignition, variation of PE size, and changing PE thickness resulted in no statistical distinction between emissions. Results suggest that dry piles, whether covered with PE or not, exhibited statistically significant lower emissions than wet piles due to better combustion efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emission factors; moisture; pile cover; polyethylene; timber slash

Year:  2016        PMID: 30713461      PMCID: PMC6355151          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  6 in total

1.  Emission reductions from woody biomass waste for energy as an alternative to open burning.

Authors:  Bruce Springsteen; Tom Christofk; Steve Eubanks; Tad Mason; Chris Clavin; Brett Storey
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Aerostat-lofted instrument and sampling method for determination of emissions from open area sources.

Authors:  Johanna Aurell; Brian K Gullett; Christopher Pressley; Dennis G Tabor; Robert D Gribble
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Characterization of emissions and residues from simulations of the Deepwater Horizon surface oil burns.

Authors:  Brian K Gullett; Johanna Aurell; Amara Holder; William Mitchell; Dale Greenwell; Michael Hays; Robyn Conmy; Dennis Tabor; William Preston; Ingrid George; Joseph P Abrahamson; Randy Vander Wal; Edith Holder
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 4.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Effect of low-density polyethylene on smoke emissions from burning of simulated debris piles.

Authors:  Seyedehsan Hosseini; Manish Shrivastava; Li Qi; David R Weise; David R Cocker; John W Miller; Heejung S Jung
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Emission factors from aerial and ground measurements of field and laboratory forest burns in the southeastern US: PM2.5, black and brown carbon, VOC, and PCDD/PCDF.

Authors:  Johanna Aurell; Brian K Gullett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Wildland Fire Emission Sampling at Fishlake National Forest, Utah Using an Unmanned Aircraft System.

Authors:  J Aurell; B Gullett; A Holder; F Kiros; W Mitchell; A Watts; R Ottmar
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.798

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.